 | How good was Japanese aviation?| Aviation Discuss How good was Japanese aviation? in the World War II - Aviation forums; Hey, sometimes, or maybe often I heard Japanese were (are) simply copy cats; their technology were simply derived largely from ... |
|
02-20-2005, 02:21 AM
|
#1 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 104
| How good was Japanese aviation? Hey, sometimes, or maybe often I heard Japanese were (are) simply copy cats; their technology were simply derived largely from others (German) and with little mdification. Of course, this is simply a mix of superfical and of racial discrimination toward Asians. We all know that Chinese were the most technological civilization on Earth for almost 2000 years (CIA World Fact Book), and westerners copied lots of most fundamenal stuffs from all of neighbors.....
Anyway, did Japan develop any outstanding aircraft (other than the famous Zero) that rival European most sophisticated fighter/bomber??? |
| |
02-20-2005, 04:54 AM
|
#2 | | Konfused with a 'K'
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Turin, Italy
Posts: 20,412
Country: | The Ki-84 Frank and N1K2-J Shiden were fantastic fighters and rivaled some of the very best American planes...Ill have a look for some info on them for you...
__________________ with my one last gaping breath id apologise for bleeding on your shirt... |
| |
02-20-2005, 04:56 AM
|
#3 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Saffron Walden/Sheffield
Posts: 3,001
Country: | The Japanese had the same sort of doctrine as the Italians, range and manouverability were the attributes needed, the armament in the early part of the pacific war was terrible (2x12.7mm) and they had no self-sealing fuel tanks or any armour
__________________ 
When you realise that the light at the end of the tunnel is actually an oncoming train, you know it's time to run for your life |
| |
02-20-2005, 05:08 AM
|
#4 | | Konfused with a 'K'
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Turin, Italy
Posts: 20,412
Country: | Quote:
Nakajima Ki-84 Hayate "Frank"
Type:
Single-seat interceptor and fighter-bomber
Origin: Nakajima
Allied Code Name: Frank
First Flight: N/A
Service Delivery: Summer 1944
Final Delivery: N/A
Number Produced: 3,514
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Engine:
Ki-84 Ia:
Model: Nakajima Ha-45
Type: Radial piston engine
Number: One Horsepower: 1,900 hp
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dimensions:
Wing span: 36 ft. 10½ in.(11.24m)
Length: 32 ft. 6½ in. (9.92m)
Height: 11 ft. 1½ in. (3.39m)
Wing Surface Area: 226.05 sq. ft. (21m²)
Weights:
Empty: 5,864 lbs. (2660 kg)
Max. Take-Off: 8,576 lbs. (3890 kg)
Performance:
Maximum Speed: 392 mph (631 km/h) at 20,080 ft.
Initial climb: N/A
Service Ceiling: 34,350 ft. (10,500m)
Range: 1,347 Miles (2168 km)
Endurance: N/A
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Armament:
Ki-84-Ia:
Two 12.7mm machine guns.
Two 20mm Cannon.
Ki-84-Ib:
Four 20mm Cannon.
Ki-84-Ic:
Two 30mm Cannon.
Two 20mm Cannon.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bomb Load:
Ki-84-Ia:
Wing racks for two 551 lb (250 kg) bombs | Quote:
Kawanishi N1K1-J/N1K2-J Shiden "Violet Lightning"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Type: Single-seat land-based intersecptor
Origin: Kawanishi
Allied Code Name: George
First Flight: December 27, 1942
Service Delivery: Early 1944
Final Delivery: N/A
Number Produced: N/A
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Powerplant
N1K1-J Prototype:
Model: Nakajima Homare 11
Type: Radial piston
Number: one Horsepower: 1,820 hp
Production N1K1-J & N1K2-J:
Model: Nakajima NK9H Homare 21
Type: Radial piston
Number: one Horsepower: 1,990 hp
Production N1K4-K:
Model: Nakajima Homare 23
Type: Radial piston
Number: one Horsepower: 2,000 hp
Production N1K5-J:
Model: Mitsubishi MK9A
Type: N/A
Number: one Horsepower: 2,200 hp
Fuel:
Capacity: N/A
Type: N/A
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dimensions:
Wing span: 39 ft. 4½ in. (12m)
Length: 30 ft. 8 in. (9.353m)
Height: 13 ft. 0 in. (3.96m)
Wing Surface Area: 252.96 sq. ft. (23.50m²)
Weights:
Empty: 5,858 lbs. (2657 kg)
Max. Take-Off: 10,714 lbs. (4860 kg) Performance:
Maximum Speed: 370 mph (595 km/h) at 18,370 ft.
Initial climb: N/A
Service Ceiling: 35,300 ft. (10,760m)
Range: 1,451 Miles (2335 km)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Armament:
N1K1-J:
Two 7.7mm machine guns
Four 20mm Cannon in wings.
N1K1-Ja:
Four 20mm Cannon in wings.
N1K1-Jb, N1K2-J:
Four 20mm Cannon in wings.
Wing racks for two 551 lb bombs or 6 air-to-ground rockets.
N1K1-Jc:
Four 20mm Cannon in wings.
Wing racks for four 551 lb bombs.
N1K2-K:
Four 20mm Cannon in wings.
N1K3-J, N1K4-J:
Four 20mm Cannon in wings.
Two 13.2mm Machine Guns in fuselage.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Variants:
N1K1-J: Prototypes and initial production version.
N1K1-Ja: Same as N1K1-J except machine guns deleted.
N1K1-Jb: Wings modified to internalize cannon and addition of bomb racks.
N1K1-Jc: Fighter-bomber variant.
N1K2-J: Production version.
N1K2-K: Two-seat trainer.
N1K3-J: Modified engine mounts and addition guns.
N1K3-A: Proposed carrier-based aircraft. Not built.
N1K4-J: Two prototypes with new powerplant.
N1K4-A: Single prototype of carrier-based variant.
N1K5-J: Single prototype with more powerful powerplant, destroyed in air raid by USAAF before completion. | www.warbirdsresourcegroup.org
__________________ with my one last gaping breath id apologise for bleeding on your shirt... |
| |
02-20-2005, 06:05 AM
|
#5 | | Master of Ewes
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 19,959
Country: | their bomber's weren't up to much though............
__________________ 
"Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy." |
| |
02-20-2005, 06:07 AM
|
#6 | | Konfused with a 'K'
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Turin, Italy
Posts: 20,412
Country: | Nah...they had some good early war dive bombers like the Val though. The G4M Betty was probably their best bomber, but it was hugely underarmed.
__________________ with my one last gaping breath id apologise for bleeding on your shirt... |
| |
02-20-2005, 06:07 AM
|
#7 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Saffron Walden/Sheffield
Posts: 3,001
Country: | Again, long range was everything so they had no armour and hardly any defensive armament. Bomb load wasn't too good either
__________________ 
When you realise that the light at the end of the tunnel is actually an oncoming train, you know it's time to run for your life |
| |
02-20-2005, 06:15 AM
|
#8 | | Master of Ewes
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 19,959
Country: | mind you they didn't exactly need a big heavy bomber, well not until the end of the war anyway.........
__________________ 
"Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy." |
| |
02-20-2005, 08:31 AM
|
#9 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Gdansk, PL
Posts: 316
Country: | Did anyone noticed, that G4M Betty had a fuselage much wider than other double-engined bombers? And I think bomb load wasn't such bad.
But I must agree that most of early war Jap planes were very easy to make a torch of them.
__________________ Pozdrawiam |
| |
02-20-2005, 08:37 AM
|
#10 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Saffron Walden/Sheffield
Posts: 3,001
Country: | couple of .50s in the fuel tanks and there we go
__________________ 
When you realise that the light at the end of the tunnel is actually an oncoming train, you know it's time to run for your life |
| |
02-20-2005, 11:37 AM
|
#11 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Nicholson, PA
Posts: 673
Country: | Quote: |
The G4M Betty was probably their best bomber
| Actually the Mitsubishi Ki67 Hiryu was considered best from what I've seen... Quote: |
This heavy bomber design was in response to a 1941 Army specification requesting a high speed heavy bomber. The Ki-67 not only met the speed requirement but did so while achieving the manueverability of a fighter. In addition, the Hiryu "Flying dragon" also sported armour and self sealing fuel tanks and was perhaps one of the best all around bomber produced by Japanese. The aircraft could be looped and it's turning radius often exceed some fighter designs. This performance inspired the development of the type into a heavy fighter, which in addition to more powerful turbocharged engines, would have a hand loaded 75mm cannon and 15 rounds of ammunition. Unfortunately (or fortunately if you are a B-29 crewman) the more powerful engines were not available and the Ki-109 was equipped with standard engines which would not allow the aircraft to reach sufficient altitude to attack the Superfortresses
| 
__________________ |
| |
02-20-2005, 11:37 AM
|
#12 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,785
| The Japaness had great Fighters  , but they were designed souly to dogfight, and not to be able to come home full of holes !
The Japanees never build a decent bomber ! The bombers they did build, had poor payload and were notoriously weak ! The six 50.cal's on a Hellcat would litterally "Rip" a betty bomber apart 
__________________ We have built a total of about 1250 of this aircraft (Me-262), but only fifty were allowed to be used as fighters - as interceptors. And out of this fifty, there were never more than 25 operational. So we had only a very, very few.
- Adolf Galland |
| |
02-20-2005, 11:41 AM
|
#13 | | Konfused with a 'K'
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Turin, Italy
Posts: 20,412
Country: | Ah thanks for that JCS, as you can see im not up on me Jap bombers 
__________________ with my one last gaping breath id apologise for bleeding on your shirt... |
| |
02-20-2005, 01:12 PM
|
#14 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 104
| By the way, I heard that during the last stage of war, Japan was acutally developing their own nuclear bomb. Americans actually destoryed a ship that carried enriched nuclear materials. |
| |
02-20-2005, 02:56 PM
|
#15 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 224
| This bad boy was supposed to be under development at the end of the war!
Its the Nakajima G10N1 Fugaku (Mount Fuji). It never got off the drawing board though.
The Japanese did have at least one 4 engined heavy bomber during the whole war! It was the Nakajima G5N1 Shinzan (Mountain Recess). There were 6 built in the 40 or 41. They were configured to be heavy bombers but served the entire time as transports!!
They also ended up building the Nakajima G8N Renzan (Mountain Range) ... Yep they liked to name stuff after mountains!!! There were four built and the first flight was in 1944.
__________________ Fighter pilots make movies....
Bomber pilots make history! |
| | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:45 AM. |  | |