 | Italian Airforce Vs Japan| Aviation Discuss Italian Airforce Vs Japan in the World War II - Aviation forums; Of the main participants in WW2 the Italians and Japanese tended to have planes that were different to the VVS, ... |
|
07-18-2005, 07:27 AM
|
#1 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: London
Posts: 2,794
| Italian Airforce Vs Japan Of the main participants in WW2 the Italians and Japanese tended to have planes that were different to the VVS, USA, German and UK forces.
Both the Japanese and Italian planes tended to be: -
a) Slower
b) More agile
c) Less well armed
Than the other airforces (PS I know that the Zero is the exception in (C))
I was wondering what peoples views were if they had come up against each other. |
| |
07-18-2005, 10:26 AM
|
#2 | | Konfused with a 'K'
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Turin, Italy
Posts: 20,412
Country: | Italians would trash the Japs. The G.55 was faster than anything the Japs had, more manoeverable and had great armament. And that was 1943. The Italians I believe were further ahead in jet technology too. As for the early years, I still think the Italians would have it.
__________________ with my one last gaping breath id apologise for bleeding on your shirt... |
| |
07-18-2005, 10:40 AM
|
#3 | | IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 12,675
Country: | I think the Italians fought better tactically although both enjoyed WW1 type dogfights. I know the Italians received extensive combat aerobatic training and would like to exploit that if they could get someone to fight on their level. With that said, the Japanese lacked teamwork and sometimes threw themselves into tactically suicidal situations!
__________________ "IF ITS RED OR DUSTY, DON'T TOUCH IT" |
| |
07-18-2005, 01:13 PM
|
#4 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 240
| The largest produced Italian inline fighter, the Macchi MC.202 could outfly just about anything in the ETO. Italian pilots often complained because their German allies fought in the horizontal in the 109 whilst the MC.202 fought in the vertical and won. Its slightly let down by the 2x12.7 MG, but this was augmented to include 2x7.7 or 2x20 as well. No Japanese plane could stand up to 3x20mm and 2x12.7mm for long.
CC, do you have any info on the G.55S? It was a torpedo carrying version that i'm having a few problems tracking down. |
| |
07-18-2005, 01:16 PM
|
#5 | | IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 12,675
Country: | Quote: |
Originally Posted by red admiral Italian pilots often complained because their German allies fought in the horizontal in the 109 whilst the MC.202 fought in the vertical and won. | Excellent point! Fighting in the vertical manages energy better and provides more options.
__________________ "IF ITS RED OR DUSTY, DON'T TOUCH IT" |
| |
07-18-2005, 01:42 PM
|
#7 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Nicholson, PA
Posts: 673
Country: | Later in the war the Italians, like CC said would trash the Japanese. But earlier in the war I think it would be more of a toss up, like something say a G.50 or MC.200 vs. a Ki27....
__________________ |
| |
07-18-2005, 01:49 PM
|
#8 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 240
| Thanks JCS, already found that one unfortunately. Earlier in the war? The Italian planes have some armour and protected fuel tanks. |
| |
07-18-2005, 01:52 PM
|
#9 | | Konfused with a 'K'
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Turin, Italy
Posts: 20,412
Country: | Yeah, the G.50, MC.200, Re-2000 were slower than stuff like the Zero (Just, well more so the G.50) but Im adamant that the Re-2000 would actually outmanouver a Zero. They were tougher too.
__________________ with my one last gaping breath id apologise for bleeding on your shirt... |
| |
07-18-2005, 01:58 PM
|
#10 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Nicholson, PA
Posts: 673
Country: | Quote: |
Originally Posted by red admiral Earlier in the war? The Italian planes have some armour and protected fuel tanks. | Yea, but I still think it'd be pretty close, the early itailian fighters had better armament and were faster but the early japanaese planes like the Ki27 and the A5M were some of the most maneuverable planes of the war and could've probably flown circles around the Cr.42s and G.50s.
I read something online a while ago about a competition bewteen an early Zero (A6M2 Model 21 I belive) and an A5M, and turns out under 300mph the Claude had the Zero every time. I'm trying to find it now but I'm not having much luck....
__________________ |
| |
07-18-2005, 02:02 PM
|
#11 | | Konfused with a 'K'
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Turin, Italy
Posts: 20,412
Country: | The Re-2000 could ace a Cr.42. Im postive it would ace the Jap planes too seen as its faster, tougher, better armed and just as/more manoeverable. Based on the P-35... http://home.att.net/~historyzone/Reggiane.html
__________________ with my one last gaping breath id apologise for bleeding on your shirt... |
| |
07-18-2005, 03:51 PM
|
#12 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 12,051
Country: | The A5M had a tighter turn than the A6M - I'd like you to provide evidence that the Re-2000 could out-turn an A6M - and then an A5M! I doubt it - but feel free to prove me wrong.
__________________ "When you go home tomorrow, don't expect anyone to know what you have been through. Even if they did know, most people probably wouldn't care anyway. Some of you may get the medals you deserve, many more of you will not. But remember this, all of you are now members of the front-line club, and that is the most exclusive club in the world." - Lt. Col. Matthew Maer CO 1st Battalion, the Princess of Wale's Royal Regiment. Camp Abu Naji, Oct. 2004  To those in that club. |
| |
07-19-2005, 12:05 AM
|
#13 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: London
Posts: 2,794
| Fiat G55
Max Speed 375mph at 6000m, 387 at 7,000m, 391 at 8000m
climb 7.2min to 6000m, 8.57min to 7000m, 10.18min to 8000m
Range (Internal) 746miles at 304mph, (2x22gal DT) 1,025miles at 354mph
Armament 1 x 20 with 380 rpg, 2 x 20 with 200 rpg, 2 x 12.7 with 300 rpg
Only one example M.M.91194 was fitted with a dummy torpedo and was fitted with a longer tailleg for ground clearence.
The thing that impressed me was the Ammo load. Most planes carried around 150rpg for the 20. The G55 could fire all day. |
| |
07-20-2005, 10:41 AM
|
#14 | | Konfused with a 'K'
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Turin, Italy
Posts: 20,412
Country: | Oh the G.55 was a great plane - The Germans were phenomenally impressed with the examples they captured and considered producing them theirselve after the Italians signed the armistice. 41,000ft ceiling was great too.
D, id love to provide evidence on that. Sadly, I dont think many tests were carried out between them, and its pretty hard to find good data on Italian planes. That site I posted above is the best Ive found on the Re-2000  Im sure the Re-2000 could out manouver an A6M, but probably not an A5M. It wouldnt matter anyway, it would still win in a dogfight.
__________________ with my one last gaping breath id apologise for bleeding on your shirt... |
| |
07-20-2005, 10:55 AM
|
#15 | | IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 12,675
Country: | I think the Japs would of sh*t if they saw A G.55 with a torpedo coming at their aircraft carriers! 
__________________ "IF ITS RED OR DUSTY, DON'T TOUCH IT" |
| | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:18 PM. |  | |