ADS NOT DISPLAYED TO REGISTERED USERS.
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 41

Jumo 222: what went wrong?

Aviation Discuss Jumo 222: what went wrong? in the World War II - Aviation forums; How good/bad was the engine? What were the milestones? Was it an example of 'the bean-counters messed it', or 'engineers ...

  1. #1
    Creator of Interesting Threads tomo pauk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    4,503
    Country
    Croatia

    Jumo 222: what went wrong?

    How good/bad was the engine? What were the milestones? Was it an example of 'the bean-counters messed it', or 'engineers messed it'? Post your data


  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Hobart Tasmania
    Posts
    2,320
    Country
    Australia
    I think the basic answer was that it was unreliable.

    It was also basically a radial with an even number (6) of banks, which is odd for a radial. Not sure if that relates to the issues they had with the engine.

  3. #3
    Senior Member davebender's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Michigan, USA
    Posts
    5,240
    Country
    United States

    RLM went wrong.

    Milch killed the Jumo 222 for political reasons. The same reason he killed the Me-210C light bomber and almost strangled the DB603 engine.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Schiedam, Holland
    Posts
    177
    Country
    Netherlands
    Quote Originally Posted by davebender View Post
    Milch killed the Jumo 222 for political reasons. The same reason he killed the Me-210C light bomber and almost strangled the DB603 engine.
    And that reason was????

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    5,329
    Country
    United States
    Mr Bender keeps posting this.

    It may even be true, I don't know.

    What we do know is that with about 270-280 engines made fewer than about 1/2 dozen airfames ever flew with them, they reported frequent engine changes, and none were ever used in an operational aircraft.

    Many other engines went to operational aircraft well before the 250th engine made it off the production line.

    Changing requirements meant that even with just 270-280 engines made there were 3 if not 4 different bore and stroke ratios for different displacements (and other displacements proposed) which did little more than dilute the development program. Weight gains of the aircraft involved as the prototypes evolved meant that the original power levels would no longer give the desired performance and Junkers was being asked to increase the power levels. Staying with the same grade of fuel left either higher rpm of larger displacement as the only avenues. Both solutions can lead to major problems as vibration patterns change, sometimes considerably. Vibration problems were a major bugaboo with large aircraft engines.

  6. #6
    Senior Member davebender's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Michigan, USA
    Posts
    5,240
    Country
    United States

    And that reason was?

    Not sure anyone could answer that question except Milch.

    During the mid to late 1930s Junkers was the fair haired boy of RLM. Jumo 211 engine production and Ju-88 aircraft production were established on a massive scale. Jumo 222 engine development was funded too. Meanwhile DB603 engine funding was cancelled and DB601 engine funding was cut by more then half.

    Milch prevented development of the He-177B heavy bomber during 1938 while pressing forward with development of the He-177A. Goering and Udet both made statements to that effect.

    During 1940 RLM apparently had a change of heart. DB601 engine funding got the increase it should have received during 1936. They funded 120 additional DB603 engine prototypes after the speed record publicity stunt.

    During 1941 RLM killed the Jumo 222 and ordered the DB603 engine into full production. However it was done in a way that prevented the DB603 engine from quickly entering production.

    During 1942 RLM killed the Me-210 even though it was in mass production and aircraft technical problems were solved by July 1942.

    RLM would not allow the Ju-252 transport to enter mass production during 1942 due to a shortage of Jumo 211 engines. Never mind that Germany had a surplus of Jumo 211 engines by 1942, forcing a cut in Jumo 211 engine production.

    Modern day American politics are bad enough. WWII German politics are beyond my comprehension.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Schiedam, Holland
    Posts
    177
    Country
    Netherlands
    Quote Originally Posted by davebender View Post
    Not sure anyone could answer that question except Milch.

    During the mid to late 1930s Junkers was the fair haired boy of RLM. Jumo 211 engine production and Ju-88 aircraft production were established on a massive scale. Jumo 222 engine development was funded too. Meanwhile DB603 engine funding was cancelled and DB601 engine funding was cut by more then half.

    Milch prevented development of the He-177B heavy bomber during 1938 while pressing forward with development of the He-177A. Goering and Udet both made statements to that effect.

    During 1940 RLM apparently had a change of heart. DB601 engine funding got the increase it should have received during 1936. They funded 120 additional DB603 engine prototypes after the speed record publicity stunt.

    During 1941 RLM killed the Jumo 222 and ordered the DB603 engine into full production. However it was done in a way that prevented the DB603 engine from quickly entering production.

    During 1942 RLM killed the Me-210 even though it was in mass production and aircraft technical problems were solved by July 1942.

    RLM would not allow the Ju-252 transport to enter mass production during 1942 due to a shortage of Jumo 211 engines. Never mind that Germany had a surplus of Jumo 211 engines by 1942, forcing a cut in Jumo 211 engine production.

    Modern day American politics are bad enough. WWII German politics are beyond my comprehension.
    I'm quiet sure that even Milch had to provide some motivation for canceling. For instance the He177B was not by a RLM specification, the me 210 had some serious handling problems and did not show much improvement over the latest versions of the me 110. So I suspect the jumo 222 must have had some obvious flaws.

  8. #8
    Senior Member davebender's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Michigan, USA
    Posts
    5,240
    Country
    United States

    me 210 had some serious handling problems

    Solved by July 1942. That's why Hungary proceeded with license production. The resulting Me-210C was well liked by both German and Hungarian pilots.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    pound va
    Posts
    1,699
    Country
    United States
    I think after the first 200 Me210A1 and 2s were delivered and found to be so unsuitable, they didn't trust that the problems had really been solved, after all Messerschmitt had just sold them 200 Me210s that were basically junk. The line was shut down in April 42.
    The RLM probably wasn't about to start up the line just a few months later just on Willy Messerschmitt's word that now the problems were solved. They'd trusted him before, and he screwed them.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    5,329
    Country
    United States
    Pilots were a suspicious lot back then ( and may be now), the Dornier 11/13 acquired such a bad reputation that it was renumbered as the Do 23 even though the modifications were not great in an effort get around the bad reputation.

    the Me 210/410 situation was similar. Hungary was already tooled up to make the 210 and I don't believe was flying the short 210 in any numbers. the Me boys just shoved DB 603s into the long 210, called it the 410 and tried again for official OK.

    The Germans were not the only ones who played games with designation numbers. The US in the late 1940s changed designation numbers on several aircraft in order to fool congress into funding them. This in addition to the P-51/A-36 funding trick.

  11. #11
    Banned Siegfried's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    794
    Country
    Australia
    Quote Originally Posted by tyrodtom View Post
    I think after the first 200 Me210A1 and 2s were delivered and found to be so unsuitable, they didn't trust that the problems had really been solved, after all Messerschmitt had just sold them 200 Me210s that were basically junk. The line was shut down in April 42.
    The RLM probably wasn't about to start up the line just a few months later just on Willy Messerschmitt's word that now the problems were solved. They'd trusted him before, and he screwed them.
    Milch disliked Messerschmitt intensely. Milchs best friend had died in a crash of one of Willy's designs and Milch had seen Willy as insensitive about it and regarded Messerschmitts designs as sailing too close to the wind. Milch, who was in charge of aircraft production, having headed Lufthansa, basically froze Messerschmitt out of contracts. In order to survive Messerschmitt sold some aircraft to Hungary, which Milch used as a pretext to publically accuse Messerschmitt of treason, presumably because he was exporting technology or aircraft production capacity.

    Messerschmitt had personally intervened in the Me 210 design(which was by Professor Woldameer Vogt) to shorten the tail and remove the slats, no doubt to reduced weight and drag and so increase performance. Milch forced Messerschmitt to go back to the original design of Vogt. He eplicitly used the term "original design of dr Vogt" and this solved the problem.

    The Me 210 was already out of production, the Me 410 that saw service were mostly Me 210 airframes modified to Me 410 standards and extreme expense at Messerscmitts own cost.
    Messerschmitt went broke, lost control and ownership of his company and possibly narrowly avoided a concentration camp. The problem was that due to 'fast tracking' the jigs were made and would need to be scrapped at great expense. Rather than do this Messerschmitt pressed on hoping for other solutions. The RLM also let him get away with it since they had allowed the fast tracking process and so were also embarrased.

    The Me 410 was clearly an excellent fighter bomber, fast, tough, accurate (it could dive bomb and had a computing bombsight). It was probably the ideal anti-shipping aircraft being able to both dive bomb and carry a torpedo. It was fitted switching hohtenweil radar and with and in theory could carry a lobe carry out blind torpedo attacks.

    Another handling issue of the 410 was the lack of counter rotating engines which worsened handling. The Me 410 was also more than just a lengthened tail 210 with bigger engines: the fueselage was deepened by 50% to fit extra equipment.

  12. #12
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    26
    Quote Originally Posted by Siegfried View Post
    Another handling issue of the 410 was the lack of counter rotating engines which worsened handling.
    Could you please educate me, what WWII aircraft had counter rotating engines besides P-38 and Hs 129? I thought that feature was still quite unique back then.

  13. #13
    Creator of Interesting Threads tomo pauk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    4,503
    Country
    Croatia
    C'mon, people, the equiring minds would like to know more about the 222

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    5,329
    Country
    United States
    Sorry Tomo, it is one those great German Mystery engines. Built in a variety of sizes, different bores and strokes, and built in considerable numbers for a prototype or development engine, it actual flew very little. It was flown a few test bed aircraft and powered a few prototypes but other prototypes of the same basic airframe switched to other lower powered engines to do their part in the test program.
    We have said before that 270-280 engines were built yet never saw an operational aircraft.

    Granted the De Havilland Gypsy 12 was a much lower powered and lower risk engine ( being a 12 cylinder version of an existing 4 and 6 cylinder series) but under 100 engines powered the the Albatross aircraft plus about 30 Don trainer/liaison aircraft.

    Given the Jumo 222s lack of use despite the numbers built there doesn't seem to be much information on how it actually worked or didn't work. The few prototypes that did use seem to have had frequent engine changes but so did some other aircraft using new, experimental engines.

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    pound va
    Posts
    1,699
    Country
    United States
    Milch's dislike of Willy Messerschmitt only seems to get mentioned in connection with the Me210 debacle, but Milch's feelings toward toward Willy doesn't seem to factor into the purchase by the RLM of the Me108, Me109, Me163, Me262, etc. He may have opposed all or some in some way, but maybe the designs themselves overcome his personal feelings.
    I think in the Me210 case, it's faults, and the fact that he initially tried to get them to accept a faulty aircraft as is, destroyed the RLM's trust in his ability to lead Messerschmitt, and just stenghtened Milch's belief that he'd been right.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 120
    Last Post: 02-10-2012, 09:44 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86