Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums
 



Go Back   Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums > World War II - Aviation > Aviation

Aviation Discussion on the aircraft of WWII.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-06-2007, 12:28 PM   #1
Member
 
16KJV11's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Timbuktu
Posts: 78
Luftwaffe Wonder Weapons

Would Hitler's Wonder Weapons if utilized earlier & properly, have turned the tide in the over all direction of the war?
I think it would only would have prolonged the war b/c the allies were working on their own jet fighters and the Red hoardes were overwhelming coming from the east.
__________________
r2
If you think practicing what you preach is rough, just try preaching what you practice.
16KJV11 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2007, 02:10 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,765
Hi 16KJV11,

>Would Hitler's Wonder Weapons if utilized earlier & properly, have turned the tide in the over all direction of the war?

Well, what's "properly"? And what do you count as "Wonder Weapon"?

If it would have been possible to build the Me 262 in numbers from mid-1943 on, that would have made a major impact on the conduct of the air war in the West, perhaps even making a 1944 invasion impossible.

(The Me 262 and the Jumo 004A was technologically ready, but the engine could not be mass-produced due to a lack of rare metals. Re-designing the engine for the available materials is what delayed the Me 262 for so long.)

Williamson Murray made a good point regarding the V-1 - it would have been much more useful as a guide surface-to-air missile than as a ballistical surface-to-surface missile. However, it's doubtful whether it would have been available in time to make a difference, even if it had been planned as a SAM from the beginning.

Regards,

Henning (HoHun)
HoHun is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2007, 02:43 PM   #3
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Pine Mountain Lake, California
Posts: 981
Quote:
Originally Posted by 16KJV11 View Post
Would Hitler's Wonder Weapons if utilized earlier & properly, have turned the tide in the over all direction of the war?
I think it would only would have prolonged the war b/c the allies were working on their own jet fighters and the Red hoardes were overwhelming coming from the east.
Yes and no; as you said, it is doubtful they could've actually won the War, given that the Allies were more or less working on the same projects as the Germans. At most, I think effective "wonder weapons" would've pushed the War, maybe, into '46, but that's about it. It must be remembered that the one "wonder weapon" the Germans didn't have was the atomic bomb; I think that, in the end, the atom bomb would've been the deciding factor in the ETO even with effective German "wonder weapons".

I love reading about and studying all of the various German "wonder weapons", some of which were years ahead of their time; but, in the end, it didn't make much difference, because the Germans did not have a coherent, effective method of utilizing them.

Last edited by SoD Stitch; 11-06-2007 at 02:44 PM. Reason: Grammar
SoD Stitch is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2007, 03:14 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Konigstiger205's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Bucharest
Posts: 907
Well you could compare the german "wonder weapons" development with their advance on the eastern front in 1941: "too much for too few to cover"...they simply had to many projects working at the same time and too little resources for that...
__________________
These airplanes we have today are no more than a perfection of a child's toy made of paper."Henri Coanda"
Konigstiger205 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2007, 03:56 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 558
The Atom Bomb trumps Hitlers Wonder weapons everytime. Unless the Germans developed the bomb, wonder weapoms at best could have extended the duration of the war by months only.

The V-2 weapons project was a huge drain on man-hours, technicians and development in key areas like instrumentation. The V-1 was more effective for the amount of reasources it used. Mostly in tying up allied resources in intercepting them.
__________________
Lord Flasheart: [about planes] Always treat your kite like you treat your woman.
Lieutenant George: How do you mean, sir? Do you mean, take her home at the week-end to meet your mother?
Lord Flasheart: No! I mean get inside her five times a day and take her to heaven and back!
Captain Blackadder: I'm beginning to see why the suffragette movement are wanting the vote.
Lord Flasheart: Hey, hey! Any girl who wants to chain herself to my railings and suffer a jet movement gets my vote!

Last edited by bigZ; 11-06-2007 at 04:00 PM.
bigZ is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2007, 10:14 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
magnocain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 394
i think u will find the link in my signature usefull
__________________
Four hostile newspapers are more to be feared than a thousand bayonets.
--Napoleon Bonaparte--
magnocain is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2007, 12:39 AM   #7
Member
 
16KJV11's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Timbuktu
Posts: 78
Quote:
Originally Posted by HoHun View Post
Hi 16KJV11,

>Would Hitler's Wonder Weapons if utilized earlier & properly, have turned the tide in the over all direction of the war?

Well, what's "properly"? And what do you count as "Wonder Weapon"?
If it would have been possible to build the Me 262 in numbers from mid-1943 on, that would have made a major impact on the conduct of the air war in the West, perhaps even making a 1944 invasion impossible.

(The Me 262 and the Jumo 004A was technologically ready, but the engine could not be mass-produced due to a lack of rare metals. Re-designing the engine for the available materials is what delayed the Me 262 for so long.)

Williamson Murray made a good point regarding the V-1 - it would have been much more useful as a guide surface-to-air missile than as a ballistical surface-to-surface missile. However, it's doubtful whether it would have been available in time to make a difference, even if it had been planned as a SAM from the beginning.

Regards,

Henning (HoHun)
One instance of not using the weapons properly (if I have my facts right that is) was Hitler's initial insistance on using the ME 262 as a bomber instead of a fighter.
Also, I believe that the ME 262 could have been in operation far sooner than it was.
__________________
r2
If you think practicing what you preach is rough, just try preaching what you practice.
16KJV11 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2007, 12:43 AM   #8
Member
 
16KJV11's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Timbuktu
Posts: 78
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigZ View Post
The Atom Bomb trumps Hitlers Wonder weapons everytime. Unless the Germans developed the bomb, wonder weapoms at best could have extended the duration of the war by months only.

The V-2 weapons project was a huge drain on man-hours, technicians and development in key areas like instrumentation. The V-1 was more effective for the amount of reasources it used. Mostly in tying up allied resources in intercepting them.
Question of the year: Would the Allies have used "The Bomb" on Nazi Germany?
Just an idle question, but intriguing to me.
__________________
r2
If you think practicing what you preach is rough, just try preaching what you practice.
16KJV11 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2007, 01:22 AM   #9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Prescott Arizona USA
Posts: 507
Quote:
Originally Posted by 16KJV11 View Post
Question of the year: Would the Allies have used "The Bomb" on Nazi Germany?
Just an idle question, but intriguing to me.
"I" say no ..At the time "The Bomb" was ready to be used ..The Allieds were closing in on Germany on one side ..And the Russians on the other... It was only a mater of time till the war was over for Germany... But I'm sure at one "point" they were thinking about it...

I hope that this does not upset some people here ..But America sort of looked at the Japanese as sub human at that time ...And the Germans as human...So it was EZer to drop it on the Japanese then the Germans... ..Its in line with the putting of the Japanese in camps in America ..But not the Germans...My American for fathers could be pigs at times..And America was more up set at the Japaneses at the time do to Pearl Harbour... But that just my take on it...

And I don't "think" we had but two any how ...I read that If the Japanese had not gave up .. We did not have any more Nukes to use...Anyone know how many nukes we did have at that time...
Haztoys is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2007, 01:22 AM   #10
Member
 
Instal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Victoria BC
Posts: 97
If it would have saved thousands or perhaps tens of thousands of allied soldiers lives then I certainly hope so.
__________________
"An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile hoping it will eat him last" Winston Churchill
Instal is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2007, 09:41 AM   #11
Senior Member
 
plan_D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 11,978
Send a message via MSN to plan_D Send a message via Yahoo to plan_D
I thought the U.S had two nuclear bombs, and both were used. And I've stated previously that the U.S would not have used the 'bomb' on Germany, for much the same reason as Haztoy has pointed out.

If Germany had been able to deploy the Me 262 earlier, by a year, then the Allied effort above Nazi Europe's skies would have been blunted to a practical standstill. It would be scary to imagine Schweinfurt followed up by swarms of Me 262s.

The 262 would have been the most wonderful of the wonder weapons, and the most deadly to the Allied war effort. And I must add that Hitler's request to have it as a bomber did not delay it's production.
__________________
"When you go home tomorrow, don't expect anyone to know what you have been through. Even if they did know, most people probably wouldn't care anyway. Some of you may get the medals you deserve, many more of you will not. But remember this, all of you are now members of the front-line club, and that is the most exclusive club in the world." - Lt. Col. Matthew Maer CO 1st Battalion, the Princess of Wale's Royal Regiment. Camp Abu Naji, Oct. 2004

To those in that club.
plan_D is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2007, 09:47 AM   #12
The Pop-Tart Whisperer
 
Njaco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: South Jersey, United States
Posts: 10,237
The nuke option has been covered a little in a previous thread on nuking Russia. But weren't the Germans also producing the A-Bomb? The problem was the heavy water needed.

I believe a Commando raid was made on a facility in Norway that produced the heavy water or at least some part needed for the bomb.
__________________

"If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it's English, thank a soldier!"


http://www.njcacoa.org/
Njaco is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2007, 09:57 AM   #13
Senior Member
 
plan_D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 11,978
Send a message via MSN to plan_D Send a message via Yahoo to plan_D
British SOE attempted on the Vemork Heavy Water plant in November 1942 called Operation Freshman. The operation was a disaster when the bomber towing the glider crashed into a mountain in low visibility. Thirty-four Royal Engineers of 1st Airborne Division died, along with the bomber and glider crew.

In Feb. 1943 Operation Gunnerside had an all Norweigan attack against the Rjukan plant. It succeeded and destroyed 500 kg of Heavy Water.

On 16th Nov. 1943, the USAAF sent 388 B-17s and B-24s against the Rjukan plant that had been repaired. They caused minimal damage. It did, however, convince the Germans to move.

On 20th Feb. 1944, Norweigan resistance made a final and successful attack against the ferry D/F "HYDRO" which was carrying the remaining Heavy Water to Germany.

I don't know how close Germany was to making a nuclear weapon, I think it's a large matter of debate on these boards.
__________________
"When you go home tomorrow, don't expect anyone to know what you have been through. Even if they did know, most people probably wouldn't care anyway. Some of you may get the medals you deserve, many more of you will not. But remember this, all of you are now members of the front-line club, and that is the most exclusive club in the world." - Lt. Col. Matthew Maer CO 1st Battalion, the Princess of Wale's Royal Regiment. Camp Abu Naji, Oct. 2004

To those in that club.
plan_D is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2007, 10:26 AM   #14
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,765
Hi 16KJV11,

>Also, I believe that the ME 262 could have been in operation far sooner than it was.

From the strength reports at The Luftwaffe, 1933-45, listing the Me 262 aircraft with the different units:

07/1944: 6 @ KG 51
08/1944: 20 @ KG 51
09/1944: 32 @ KG 51
10/1944: 52 @ KG 51, 5 @ KG 54
11/1944: 72 @ KG 51, 8 @ KG 54, 38 @ JG 7
12/1944: 100 @ KG 51, 20 @ KG 54, 14 @ JG 7, 23 @ EJG 2, 6 @ Kommando Braunegg

(Note that Kommando Nowottny is not listed until it becomes JG 7.)

So one could say that there was a delay of about three to four months in getting the Me 262 into service as a fighter.

However, note that the strength of JG 7 drops after its initial establishment - they transferred 15 aircraft to "different units", which I believe must have meant EJG 2 primarily which was a jet fighter conversion unit. From single-engine piston fighter to twin-engine jet fighter it was a great step, and the Luftwaffe found that the pilots had to be re-trained in order to be able to use the jets properly.

The materials question, on the other hand, had introduced a delay of about one year. It's hard to quantify that exactly since it was clear from the beginning that the Jumo 004A was not suitable for mass production, but as a rough benchmark, we can look at the first flight with Jumo 004A engines in July 1942 compared to the first flight with Jumo 004B engines in October 1943.

(With regard to the SAM question, I have to correct myself: Williamson Murray of course considered the V-2 as a possible SAM, not the V-1! :-)

Regards,

Henning (HoHun)
HoHun is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2007, 06:06 PM   #15
Member
 
16KJV11's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Timbuktu
Posts: 78
Wasn't Heinkel experimenting with a jet airplane as early as 1940-41, maybe earlier?
I know the Italians were (Caproni Campini?)
One wonders the result if Hitler actually put the concept pedal to the metal.
__________________
r2
If you think practicing what you preach is rough, just try preaching what you practice.
16KJV11 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:27 AM.
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Ad Management plugin by RedTyger
Design by HTWoRKS


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118