Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums
 



Go Back   Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums > World War II - Aviation > Aviation

Aviation Discussion on the aircraft of WWII.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-06-2009, 04:16 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Clay_Allison's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 925
Methods for fireproofing fuel tanks

We all know about self-sealing fuel tanks and I've heard that some fighters rerouted exhaust into the fuel tanks to displace any oxygen in the tank to prevent fires.

Were any other systems developed to prevent enemy fire from turning the plane into a fireball if a round went into the tank? (I considered that just having a can of compressed CO2 connected to the gas tank that could be blown off into the tanks would work).
__________________
It's always easy to find reasons why something shouldn't be done, the trick is to find ways to get it done. -- claidemore
Clay_Allison is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2009, 04:55 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 502
Actually some models of the Brewster Buffalo were fitted with CO2 tanks to fill the space in the tank as the fuel was used instead of routing exhaust gas into the tanks.

I am not sure how much of the problem was the fuel and air in the tank vrs fuel leaking into spaces in the plane after a hit. You have to have the right mixture of fuel and air to burn. Too rich and it won't light and too lean and it won't light either. Hits from large caliber guns (including .50cals) on full or nearly full tanks could cause hydralic shock waves (for want of a better term at the moment) that could split seams in the tank causing massive fuel leaks.
Then there is the timing problem for CO2 release. Any manual relase system is almost bound to be too late in timing (tank has already blown itself open or simply gone out due to lack of oxogen,tough feeding a fire through a couple of rifle calibe bullet holes) and a fast acting automatic system might be beyond WW II capabilities.
Shortround6 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2009, 12:55 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
Clay_Allison's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 925
Quote:
Actually some models of the Brewster Buffalo were fitted with CO2 tanks to fill the space in the tank as the fuel was used instead of routing exhaust gas into the tanks.
Did this work or was it fanciful and useless?
__________________
It's always easy to find reasons why something shouldn't be done, the trick is to find ways to get it done. -- claidemore
Clay_Allison is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2009, 02:31 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
syscom3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 10,283
Wouldnt it make more sense to automatically discharge [slowly] the CO2 into the fuel tanks as the fuel is used up? The empty portion of the fuel tank would not support any combustion under that circumstance.
__________________
"Pilot to copilot..... what are those mountain goats doing up here in the clouds?"
syscom3 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2009, 04:50 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
proton45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 415
This may be a little bit of a "dry" read, but I found it interesting...

If this is too hard to read...go to FUEL TANK CONSTRUCTION


Self-Sealing Fuel Cells A self-sealing cell is a fuel container that auto- matically seals small holes or damage caused during combat operations. A self-sealing cell is not bulletproof, merely puncture sealing. As illustrated in figure 3-31, the bullet penetrates the outside wall of the cell, and the sticky, elastic sealing material surrounds the bullet. As the bullet passes through the cell wall into the cell, the sealant springs together quickly and closes the hole. Now some of the fuel in the tank comes in contact with the sealant and makes it swell, completing the seal. In this application, the natural stickiness of rubber and the basic qualities of rubber and petroleum seal the hole. This sealing action reduces the tire hazard brought aboutby leaking fuel. It keeps the aircraft’s fuel intact so the aircraft may continue operating and return to its base. The most commonly used types of self-sealing fuel cells are the standard construction type and the type that uses a bladder along with the self-sealing cell. Of the two, the standard construction cell is used the most. It is a semiflexible cell, made up of numerous plies of material. The combination bladder and self-sealing cell is made up of two parts. One part is a bladder-type cell, and the other part is identical to the standard construction cell. It is designed to self-seal holes or damage in the bottom and the lower portions of the side areas. The bladder part of the cell (nonself-sealing) is usually restricted to the upper portion. This type of cell is also semi flexible. SELF-SEALING CELL (STANDARD CONSTRUCTION).— There are four primary layers of materials used in the construction of a self-sealing cell. These layers are the inner liner, nylon fuel barrier, sealant, and retainer. All self-sealing fuel cells now in service contain these four primary layers of materials. If additional plies are used in the construction of the cell, they will be related to one of the primary plies. The inner liner material is the material used inside the cell. It is constructed of Buna N synthetic rubber. Its purpose is to contain the fuel and prevent it from coming in contact with the sealant. This will prevent premature swelling or deterioration of the sealant. Buna rubber is an artificial substitute for crude or natural rubber. It is produced from butadiene and sodium, and is made in two types, Buna S and Buna N. The Buna S is the most common type of synthetic rubber. It is unsuitable for use as inner liner material in fuel cells. It causes the petroleum fuels used in aircraft to swell and eventually dissolve. The Buna N is not affected by petroleum fuels, making it ideal for this application. However, the Buna N is slightly porous, making it necessary to use a nylon barrier to prevent the fuel from contacting the sealant. The nylon fuel barrier is an unbroken film of nylon. The purpose of the nylon fuel barrier is to prevent the fuel from diffusing farther into the cell. The nylon is brushed, swabbed, or sprayed in three or four hot coats to the outer surface of the inner liner during construction. The sealant material is the next material used in fuel cell construction. It remains dormant in the fuel cell until the cell is ruptured or penetrated by a projectile. It is the function of the sealant to seal the ruptured area. This will keep the fuel from flowing through to the exterior of the fuel cell (fig. 3-31.) The mechanical reaction results because rubber, both natural and synthetic, will “give” under the shock of impact. This will limit damage to a small hole in the fuel cell. The fuel cell materials will allow the projectile to enter or leave the cell, and then the materials will return to their original position. This mechanical reaction is almost instantaneous. The chemical reaction takes place as soon as fuel vapors penetrate through the inner liner material and reach the sealant. The sealant, upon contact with fuel vapors, will extend or swell to several times its normal size. This effectively closes the rupture and prevents the fuel from escaping. The sealant is made from natural gum rubber.The retainer material is the next material used in fuel cell construction. The purpose of the retainer is to provide strength and support. It also increases the efficiency of the mechanical action by returning the fuel cell to its original shape when punctured. It is made of cotton or nylon cord fabric impregnated with Buna N rubber. SELF-SEALING CELL (NONSTANDARD CONSTRUCTION).—One variation from the standard construction, self-sealing fuel cell previously discussed is shown in figure 3-32. It has four primary layers–an inner liner, a nylon fuel barrier, two sealant plies, and three retainer plies. The cords in the first retainer ply run lengthwise of the cell. The cords in the second retainer run at a 45-degree angle to the first. The cords in the third retainer run at a 90-degree angle to the second. The outside is coated with Buns-Vinylite lacquer to protect the cell from spilled fuel and weathering. Baffles and internal bulkheads are used inside the cell to help retain the shape of the cell and prevent sloshing of the fuel. They are constructed of square woven fabric impregnated with Buna N rubber. Flapper valves are fitted to some baffles to control the direction of fuel flow between compartments or interconnecting cells. They are constructed of Micarta, Bakelite, or aluminum. These plies, baffles, internal bulkheads, and flapper valves with the necessary fittings and combinations make up a typical self-sealing fuel cell. A nonself-sealing fuel cell is commonly called a bladder cell. It is a fuel container that does not self-seal holes or punctures. The advantage of using a bladder fuel cell results from the saving in weight. Some of the other advantages are the simplicity of repair techniques and the reduced procurement costs over self-sealing fuel cells. Bladder-type cells are usually made of very thin material to give minimum possible weight. They require 100-percent support from a smooth cavity. The cell is made slightly larger than the cavity of the aircraft for better weight and distribution throughout the aircraft’s fuel cavity structure. The thinner wall construction increases the fuel capacity over the self-sealing cells, thus increasing the range of the aircraft. Many of our aircraft that were formerly equipped with self-sealing cells have been changed to bladder-type cells. There are two types of bladder fuel cells–rubber type and nylon type. RUBBER-TYPE BLADDER CELLS.—The rubber-type bladder cells are made in the same manner as self-sealing cells. They have a liner, nylon barrier, and a retainer ply. The sealant layers are omitted. All three plies are placed on the building form as one material in the following order: liner, barrier, and retainer. Figure 3-33 shows this type construction. The inner liner may consist of Buns N rubber, Buna N coated square-woven fabric (cotton or nylon), or Buna N coated cord fabric. The purpose of the inner liner is to contain the fuel and provide protection for the nylon barrierThe nylon barrier consists of three to four coats of nylon applied hot by brush, swab, or spray. The purpose of the nylon barrier is to keep fuel from diffusing through the cell wall. The retainer consists of Buna N coated square- woven fabric (cotton or nylon) or cord fabric. The purpose of the retainer ply or plies is to lend strength to the fuel cell and provide protection for the nylon fuel barrier. NYLON-TYPE BLADDER CELLS (PLIO- CEL).—Nylon bladder cells differ in construction and material from the Buna N rubber cells. This type of cell may be identified by the trade name “Pliocel” stenciled on the outside of the cell. The Pliocel construction consists of two layers of nylon woven fabric laminated with three layers of transparent nylon film. The repair of this type of cell must be accomplished by entirely different methods and with different materials. The adhesive and Buna N rubber used to repair the rubber-type bladder cell cannot be used on the nylon-type cell.

The illustrations below are 3-31, 32 and 33
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 14018_151_1.jpg (23.3 KB, 27 views)
File Type: jpg 14018_152_1.jpg (11.8 KB, 26 views)
File Type: jpg 14018_152_2.jpg (12.7 KB, 27 views)
proton45 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2009, 11:20 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
Clay_Allison's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 925
how much more does a self-sealing tank weigh vs. a "normal" tank?
__________________
It's always easy to find reasons why something shouldn't be done, the trick is to find ways to get it done. -- claidemore
Clay_Allison is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2009, 11:35 AM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 502
A lot would depend on the size/shape of the tank. If the self sealing "stuff" weighs "X" per sq/ft, how many sq/ft do you need to to do the surface of the tank?

Long flat tanks having more surface area per gallon of volume than short fat tanks and multipule tanks having more serface area than one big tank of equel capacity.
Shortround6 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:29 AM.
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Ad Management plugin by RedTyger
Design by HTWoRKS


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118