 | Mosquito better than B-17?????| Aviation Discuss Mosquito better than B-17????? in the World War II - Aviation forums; As far as I know, it seems that, in terms of speed and of crash rate, Mosquito
had much beeter ... |
|
02-17-2005, 11:31 AM
|
#1 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 104
| Mosquito better than B-17????? As far as I know, it seems that, in terms of speed and of crash rate, Mosquito
had much beeter record than all other bombers, including the famous B-17.
So, why Allies decided to choose B-17 over Mosquito?
and why B-17 is QUEEEN of Bombers? |
| |
02-17-2005, 11:39 AM
|
#2 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,552
| Huh ?
The B-17 is a large Bomber, and the Mosquito is a Bomber-interceptor or nighfighter !
__________________ We have built a total of about 1250 of this aircraft (Me-262), but only fifty were allowed to be used as fighters - as interceptors. And out of this fifty, there were never more than 25 operational. So we had only a very, very few.
- Adolf Galland |
| |
02-17-2005, 11:39 AM
|
#3 | | Konfused with a 'K'
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Turin, Italy
Posts: 20,412
Country: | B-17 isnt Queen of Bombers, B-29 is  Well the Lancaster was better than both in the real world
Well the Mossie was British, and The B-17 was American, and it would make more sense for the USAAF to use their bomber rather than the British. Besides, Mosquito's were very good at other roles besides bombing and were being used for other duties (nightfighting, recon etc), and nearly twice the amount of B-17's were built compared to the Mossie and were more readily available. I agree using the Mossie would have made more sense but it wasnt the practical thing to do.
Welcome to the site as well 
__________________ with my one last gaping breath id apologise for bleeding on your shirt... |
| |
02-17-2005, 11:41 AM
|
#4 | | Konfused with a 'K'
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Turin, Italy
Posts: 20,412
Country: | Soren, the Mossie could carry almost the same load as the B-17 normally carried the same distance, and much faster 
__________________ with my one last gaping breath id apologise for bleeding on your shirt... |
| |
02-17-2005, 11:42 AM
|
#5 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,552
| Well the B-17 could carry good load more bombs !! Thats why it was used more for bombing than the Mossie !
__________________ We have built a total of about 1250 of this aircraft (Me-262), but only fifty were allowed to be used as fighters - as interceptors. And out of this fifty, there were never more than 25 operational. So we had only a very, very few.
- Adolf Galland |
| |
02-17-2005, 11:43 AM
|
#6 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,552
| What !! We are talking about the same mosquito here right ?
__________________ We have built a total of about 1250 of this aircraft (Me-262), but only fifty were allowed to be used as fighters - as interceptors. And out of this fifty, there were never more than 25 operational. So we had only a very, very few.
- Adolf Galland |
| |
02-17-2005, 11:47 AM
|
#7 | | Konfused with a 'K'
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Turin, Italy
Posts: 20,412
Country: | Yep, B-17 normally carried 8000lbs to Germany, right? The Mossie could do the same with 6,000lbs, but much faster
Yes, in terms of maximum the B-17 could carry 17,600lbs, but not very far. 
__________________ with my one last gaping breath id apologise for bleeding on your shirt... |
| |
02-17-2005, 11:50 AM
|
#8 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,552
| Yes thats right. I just thought you meant they had the same bomb load, wich they certainly havent 
__________________ We have built a total of about 1250 of this aircraft (Me-262), but only fifty were allowed to be used as fighters - as interceptors. And out of this fifty, there were never more than 25 operational. So we had only a very, very few.
- Adolf Galland |
| |
02-17-2005, 11:52 AM
|
#9 | | Konfused with a 'K'
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Turin, Italy
Posts: 20,412
Country: | No that would just be stupid 
__________________ with my one last gaping breath id apologise for bleeding on your shirt... |
| |
02-17-2005, 11:55 AM
|
#10 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,552
| Yeah you can say that again 
__________________ We have built a total of about 1250 of this aircraft (Me-262), but only fifty were allowed to be used as fighters - as interceptors. And out of this fifty, there were never more than 25 operational. So we had only a very, very few.
- Adolf Galland |
| |
02-17-2005, 12:04 PM
|
#11 | | Master of Ewes
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 19,959
Country: | actually it wasn't uncommon for B-17s to carry a meer 2,000lbs to berlin, but the most common load was 6,000lbs...........
__________________ 
"Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy." |
| |
02-17-2005, 12:29 PM
|
#12 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Saffron Walden/Sheffield
Posts: 3,001
Country: | I don't think a B-17 could carry a cookie to Berlin TWICE in one night though, I can think of a plane that could cough*mossie*cough 
__________________ 
When you realise that the light at the end of the tunnel is actually an oncoming train, you know it's time to run for your life |
| |
02-17-2005, 12:33 PM
|
#13 | | Master of Ewes
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 19,959
Country: | and the mossie was just as accurate by night than the B-17 was by day.........
__________________ 
"Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy." |
| |
02-17-2005, 12:35 PM
|
#14 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Saffron Walden/Sheffield
Posts: 3,001
Country: | and it wasn't made out of essential war materials, it was the wooden wonder
__________________ 
When you realise that the light at the end of the tunnel is actually an oncoming train, you know it's time to run for your life |
| |
02-17-2005, 12:43 PM
|
#15 | | Master of Ewes
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 19,959
Country: | fewer crew lost if, in the unlikely event, one was shot down..........
__________________ 
"Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy." |
| | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:10 PM. |  | |