 | Mossie nf vs He 219 nf| Aviation Discuss Mossie nf vs He 219 nf in the World War II - Aviation forums; Well, the fastest variants of the Mosquito was naturally the PR ones, which un-armed and well fueled, flew long ... |
|
06-26-2004, 07:26 PM
|
#106 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 584
| Well, the fastest variants of the Mosquito was naturally the PR ones, which un-armed and well fueled, flew long distances and great heights...they were usually very 'on their toes...'- The bomber/pathfinders were also un-armed, and depending on their role, may have carried bombs, or else flares and TI's [target indicators], which weren't as heavy...My contention is the one's shot-down by He 219's were possibly these. -You say that that was the He 219's Job, shooting down bombers...The NF/Intruders were a different breed, and being hunters, probably kept their eye's-peeled for their 'opponents'. - I'm not exactly sure , just at this point , whether these variants carried 'tail-warning radar';- the books I've originally read on these chaps, I don't presently have, to check on this now; - But I suspect that some NF variants did carry this type of equipment, as the radar started to improve about the time Mosquitos took over the NF role from Beaufighters, and IFF was starting to come on line. - As Lanc says, the crews knew they had a superb aircraft, and yes, they weren't invulnerable, but they could take enormous damage, and still return....There is alot of documentation to support this, it was a special feature of the wooden design that it 'could take damage', but especially, how easily repaired they could be in most circumstances...- In a nutshell, I feel about the Mosquito, the way you feel about the Lightning, LG...-They were both exceptional aircraft, in their chosen roles...the Lightning particuarly as a single-seater;- the Mosquito, for firstly the 'un-armed' aspect of it's Bomber/Pathfinder/PR variants;.. and the hitting-power and all-round aspects of the Fighter/Bomber variants.....- I saw you 'drooling' over the comment I made about 'putting Griffons' in the Mosquito... -Your immediate comment was 'what about the Lightning too...' - [let alone Merlins..! ].. -They were exceptional aircraft, Mosquitos, considering they were only supposed to last for a few missions.... |
| |
06-27-2004, 05:52 AM
|
#107 | | Master of Ewes
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 19,959
Country: | what i think was even more stupid was that in typically british style we didn't even want it at first, it wasn't untill we thoguht we could do with something that didn't use "stratigic material".......................
__________________ 
"Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy." |
| |
06-28-2004, 12:46 AM
|
#108 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 584
| Yeah, Geoffrey de Havilland had a real friend in Sir Wilfred Freeman, I think it was, because the Govt. blokes nick-named it 'Freeman's Folly' originally...the idea was that they had a way to make use of the very valuable Woodworking Craftsmen, and as you say , the Wood as a not needed 'strategic material'....What a success that idea was !!! |
| |
06-28-2004, 03:17 PM
|
#109 | | Master of Ewes
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 19,959
Country: | i bet we were pretty pissed off we didn't accept it earlier................
__________________ 
"Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy." |
| |
06-29-2004, 08:51 AM
|
#110 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 584
| I feel that it came at the 'right' time... it certainly impressed all it's critics straight-off, being 50 mph faster than the current Spitfire. When you consider that it was wood and proposed as an 'un-armed' aircraft, it was natural that there would be sceptics, but what it went on to become, probably Britain's 'Best All-rounder', I'm inclined to think it was 'Divine-intervention'.... |
| |
06-29-2004, 12:58 PM
|
#111 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,512
| The emphasis of just about every country between the world wars was on the strategic bomber carrying withering firepower and acting like an airborne battleship. Given that background, the idea of the Mossie was a bit hard to swallow. There were similar reservations with using the P-38 as a strategic bomber.
__________________ |
| |
06-29-2004, 01:27 PM
|
#112 | | Master of Ewes
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 19,959
Country: | but you can see why they were skeptical of the mossie, IT WAS MADE OF WOOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
__________________ 
"Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy." |
| |
06-29-2004, 10:46 PM
|
#113 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,512
| Several of the Russian aircraft used wooden compontents to cut down on the requirements of aluminum.
__________________ |
| |
06-30-2004, 12:11 PM
|
#114 | | Master of Ewes
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 19,959
Country: | but they were wooden COMPONENTS, this whole thing was wood, and a bet the russian planes you're refering to weren't as impressive as the mossie......................
__________________ 
"Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy." |
| |
06-30-2004, 03:38 PM
|
#115 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,512
| No they weren't, but the Mossie wasn't ENTIRELY wooden either.
__________________ |
| |
06-30-2004, 04:30 PM
|
#116 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,043
| Unless.... It had magical Balsa-Oak composite Merlins....
If this please you Hot Space, the wood is from Wales. |
| |
06-30-2004, 10:04 PM
|
#117 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,512
| Don't forget landing gear, instruments, seats, windows, etc.
__________________ |
| |
07-01-2004, 12:14 PM
|
#118 | | Master of Ewes
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 19,959
Country: | well obviously i meant the fusilage and wings were wood, the controll surfaces were fabric covered...........................
__________________ 
"Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy." |
| |
07-01-2004, 11:09 PM
|
#119 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,512
| But it wasn't what you said . . . 
__________________ |
| |
07-02-2004, 12:26 PM
|
#120 | | Master of Ewes
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 19,959
Country: | don't get picky...............................
__________________ 
"Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy." |
| | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:52 PM. |  | |