Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums
 



Go Back   Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums > World War II - Aviation > Aviation

Aviation Discussion on the aircraft of WWII.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-28-2008, 12:26 AM   #1
Senior Member
 
Wildcat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Queensland
Posts: 4,543
Nightfighters at Rabaul.

Can someone enlighten me to what aircraft and what nightfighter units the Japanese had based at Rabaul in the Oct '43 - Feb '44 timeframe. Any info welcome.
Cheers.
__________________

Wildcat is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2008, 12:10 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
parsifal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,994
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wildcat View Post
Can someone enlighten me to what aircraft and what nightfighter units the Japanese had based at Rabaul in the Oct '43 - Feb '44 timeframe. Any info welcome.
Cheers.
I very vaguely recall somewhere that there was a small unit of J1N Geckos deployed there in 1943. I will see what I can dig up, but it might be pretty rough
__________________
Do not judge on abilities, but on choices
parsifal is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2008, 12:53 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 484
Right, the recon unit of the 251st Air Group operated night fighter Gekko's from Rabaul starting in May 1943. They operated in detachments at other Solomons/Bismark islands bases too. The planned strength was eventually 15 a/c (at all bases combined) but was usually a lot less, often only a plane or two, or none, available at Rabaul. The last two operational a/c were formally withdrawn in late Feb '44 when the IJN threw in towel on defending Rabaul, but resurrected wrecks did some interceptions after that.

See "Moonlight Interceptor" (Famous a/c of the National Air and Space Museum no 8 ) and Sakaida "The Siege of Rabaul".

Joe
JoeB is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2008, 10:28 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Wildcat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Queensland
Posts: 4,543
Thanks guys, A few more questions. Did the Gekko's have much or any success in this area? Did single engine day fighters ever attampt night interceptions over Rabaul? And finally in the big raids flown against Rabaul from Oct '43 onwards, did the USAAF fly any night missions or was this the domain of the RAAF Beaufort squadrons?
Thanks for any help.
__________________

Wildcat is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2008, 11:00 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
parsifal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,994
The Gekkos enjoyed considerable success. There was just a single conversion a J1Nc Kai model, which undergone some fields mods to make it suitable for Night Fighting (no radar, but modeifed armament in early 1943, which reportedly shot down two B17s of the 43rd BG on the 21 may 1943. IGHQ heard about it, and immediately gave orders for a fully developed conversion to be put into production. This was the J1Ns, and entered production from September. As Joe says, there were about 6 in total at rabaul, but when and in what strength they were available I dont know. I do know they were withdrawn about January 1944, as part of the IJNs general withdrawal of air assets from the base.

I dont know how many J1NCs were present from 21 May to September, when the J1NS models began to be deployed.

The J1NSs enjoyed some success later in the war, against the B-29, and reportedly enjoyed quite a bit of success against B-24s. It has to be said, however, that the B-29s were a handful for the Gekkos, because of their speed and altitude. Top scorer was Shigetoshi Kudo who enjoyed 9 victories apparently.

I dont know of any day fighters used for night operations. I am doubtful that the Japanese used them, because it still takes a modicum of changes duch as flame dampeners and special interiro lighting, as well some decent radio equipment, before this sort of thing could be undertaken. The Germans that used this tactic suffered quite high attrition due to landing accidents, so maybe the Japs werent prepred to risk their day fighters to this extent. Anyway, I dont have any information about day fighters used for this purpose. maybe they did, i just am not sure
__________________
Do not judge on abilities, but on choices
parsifal is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2008, 01:56 PM   #6
“Archive”
 
Micdrow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 4,853
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wildcat View Post
Thanks guys, A few more questions. Did the Gekko's have much or any success in this area? Did single engine day fighters ever attampt night interceptions over Rabaul? And finally in the big raids flown against Rabaul from Oct '43 onwards, did the USAAF fly any night missions or was this the domain of the RAAF Beaufort squadrons?
Thanks for any help.
Hi Wildcat,

I dont normally do this but to help answer some of the many questions you had I made you a small book from a variety of sources. Less to type up, hope this helps

First source is a couple of pages on the 251st. Book is Japanese Naval Aces and Fighter Units of WWII by Ikuhiko Hata and Yasuho Izawa translated by Don Cyril Gorham

Second source and break down of Gekko is Japanese Aircraft of the Pacific War by Rene J Francillon.

Profiles are from the book Revi Magazine #37 5/2001 to show different layouts of the Gekko
Attached Files
File Type: pdf Gekko.pdf (3.32 MB, 18 views)
__________________

"Valor does not mean Hero."
Micdrow is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2008, 05:58 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 241
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wildcat View Post
And finally in the big raids flown against Rabaul from Oct '43 onwards, did the USAAF fly any night missions or was this the domain of the RAAF Beaufort squadrons?
Thanks for any help.
Wildcat,
in mid 1943:
Quote:
The assigned missions of the Fifth Air Force during the week of the
three landings had been held up by the miserable weather prevailing
until the 30th. But it cleared sufficiently that day to permit eight B- I 7’s
and three B-24’s to hit Vunakanau at Rabaul. During the following
night, ten B-24’s struck at Lakunai and Rapopo; Vunakanau and Rapo-
po were the targets for eleven B-17’s and seven B-24’S on 2 July; and
all three airfields were bombed by thirteen B-24’s a day later. One B- I 7
was lost in this four-day assault, in which almost 100 tons of bombs
were dropped.
And in october
Quote:
Beginning the night of 25/26 October, he [Kenney] scheduled nightly
attacks on Buka and Kavieng to prevent the enemy from building up
his strength at these two points; and if necessary, he planned to supple-
ment these by daylight strikes. However, Halsey requested that Ken-
ney’s bombers concentrate their attention upon Rabaul, relying upon
his own forces to reduce the Bougainville fields, and this was done.
Sorce: Maurer's The AAF in WW2

Max
maxs75 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2008, 03:30 AM   #8
Senior Member
 
Wildcat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Queensland
Posts: 4,543
Guys thanks alot for the info! Paul that PDF file pretty much answered my questions (thanks mate, appreciate the effort!). Appears it was Gekko's from the 251st intercepting RAAF Beauforts over the Rabaul area in the Oct 43-Jan 44 time frame. I have four occasions in which interception was attempted (on the nights of 4th, 14th and 17th of Nov plus one on the 20th of Dec.), however in all cases the Beauforts were able to jettison their bomb loads and head for home. These unsuccessful interceptions fits in with the lack of success the 251st had in this period - as stated in the first half of your PDF.
__________________

Wildcat is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2008, 08:16 AM   #9
“Archive”
 
Micdrow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 4,853
Your welcome wildcat, some where I have some pictures of close ups of the installation of the upper looking cannons, I will see if I can dig them up.
__________________

"Valor does not mean Hero."
Micdrow is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:29 AM.
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Ad Management plugin by RedTyger
Design by HTWoRKS


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118