 | it was not smart| Aviation Discuss it was not smart in the World War II - Aviation forums; now from what i know the 262 was desined as a fighter but Hitler thought that stoping allied bombers with ... |
|
03-07-2008, 11:11 AM
|
#1 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 368
Country: | it was not smart now from what i know the 262 was desined as a fighter but Hitler thought that stoping allied bombers with a jet was for losers and told them to put bombs on it. i honistly think that was a bad idea. |
| |
03-07-2008, 11:25 AM
|
#2 | | Der Crewchief
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 30,276
Country: | So did Hitler actually say that attacking bombers with a jet was for "Losers"? 
__________________ US Army Blackhawk Crewchief 2000-2006 Classic ww2aircraft.net quotes: fly boy said: "isn't that the first jet bomber? becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles" "wait what ok who made the b-2 crash come on people that messed up its a b-2" "ah yes the mistel those things are so annoying is games and in real life" |
| |
03-07-2008, 11:26 AM
|
#3 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 368
Country: | well more of defeatists or something like that |
| |
03-07-2008, 11:33 AM
|
#4 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Escondido,Ca
Posts: 2,128
Country: | Get in fast shoot leave fast
__________________ Dont shoot him...... It will just make him angry. |
| |
03-07-2008, 11:39 AM
|
#5 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 2,971
Country: | Quote:
Originally Posted by fly boy i honistly think that was a bad idea. | Me too. 
__________________ |
| |
03-07-2008, 11:41 AM
|
#6 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 368
Country: | yea all the 262 would have to do is fly about 1000ft above the bombers dive shoot all their rockets and fly back to base hopefull that the escort didn't follow them to base and that it it so easy |
| |
03-07-2008, 11:43 AM
|
#7 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Escondido,Ca
Posts: 2,128
Country: | Well they could do that but i think they might stop at winchells first for a donut and coffee 
__________________ Dont shoot him...... It will just make him angry. |
| |
03-07-2008, 01:09 PM
|
#8 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Bucharest
Posts: 832
Country: | Well its not something new that Hitler was probably the allies best general 
__________________ These airplanes we have today are no more than a perfection of a child's toy made of paper."Henri Coanda" |
| |
03-07-2008, 01:22 PM
|
#9 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Pine Mountain Lake, California
Posts: 804
Country: | Quote:
Originally Posted by DerAdlerIstGelandet So did Hitler actually say that attacking bombers with a jet was for "Losers"?  | ROFL!
__________________
Last edited by SoD Stitch : 03-07-2008 at 01:26 PM.
|
| |
03-07-2008, 01:28 PM
|
#10 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 208
Country: | Also, I think hitler liked the idea of a fast bomber to give it a role suitable for the Blitzkreig tactics that served him well in the earlier stages of the war. Rather than expanding on these newer revolutionary aircraft, he insisted that all existing aircraft models be improved and altred in several ways to get an "ideal variant" due of their successful operational history at the break of the war.
As far as the 262 goes, there was a variant with a 50mm cannon in the nose. I wonder how effective it would've been against those bombers? Variants: Me 262A-1a/U4 |
| |
03-07-2008, 01:45 PM
|
#11 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 2,971
Country: | If memory serves (which it probably doesn't  ) the 50mm cannon was shown to be so prone to jamming that it was basically worthless. Plus the strain it put on the airframe was incredible. Or am I thinking of another big cannon they mounted to an airframe.
Heck, I can't remember. Someone help!!!!!!
__________________ |
| |
03-07-2008, 01:50 PM
|
#12 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: South Jersey, United States
Posts: 7,179
Country: | That was later before all the fun stuff. Actually it was the engines that gave the program problems and lengthened the time it got to service.
Hitler just added icing to the cake with his obsession with dive bombers and saw a potential to keep the Allies off the beaches when the attack came by using the 262 as a bomber. He actually ordered that every few 262s produced would be a fighter. But the engines, the engines......
__________________ 
"If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it's English, thank a soldier!" |
| |
03-07-2008, 01:58 PM
|
#13 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 2,971
Country: | I do remember that the actual combat life of the Jumo engines was only 12 hours!!!! Incredible.
__________________ |
| |
03-07-2008, 01:59 PM
|
#14 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: South Jersey, United States
Posts: 7,179
Country: | I think 10 - 12. Still freaking limited!
__________________ 
"If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it's English, thank a soldier!" |
| |
03-07-2008, 04:52 PM
|
#15 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Pine Mountain Lake, California
Posts: 804
Country: | Quote:
Originally Posted by Njaco I think 10 - 12. Still freaking limited! | Yeah, with an MTBF of around 25 hours.
__________________ |
| | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:17 PM. |  | |