Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums
 



Go Back   Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums > World War II - Aviation > Aviation

Aviation Discussion on the aircraft of WWII.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-07-2008, 12:11 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
fly boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 853
it was not smart

now from what i know the 262 was desined as a fighter but Hitler thought that stoping allied bombers with a jet was for losers and told them to put bombs on it. i honistly think that was a bad idea.
fly boy is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2008, 12:25 PM   #2
Der Crewchief
 
DerAdlerIstGelandet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 33,152
So did Hitler actually say that attacking bombers with a jet was for "Losers"?

__________________


fly boy:"isnt that the first jet bomber becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"[/I]
DerAdlerIstGelandet is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2008, 12:26 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
fly boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 853
well more of defeatists or something like that
fly boy is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2008, 12:33 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
wilbur1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Escondido,Ca
Posts: 2,206
Get in fast shoot leave fast
__________________

Dont shoot him...... It will just make him angry.
wilbur1 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2008, 12:39 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Thorlifter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 4,345
Quote:
Originally Posted by fly boy View Post
i honistly think that was a bad idea.
Me too.
__________________
Thorlifter is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2008, 12:41 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
fly boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 853
yea all the 262 would have to do is fly about 1000ft above the bombers dive shoot all their rockets and fly back to base hopefull that the escort didn't follow them to base and that it it so easy
fly boy is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2008, 12:43 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
wilbur1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Escondido,Ca
Posts: 2,206
Well they could do that but i think they might stop at winchells first for a donut and coffee
__________________

Dont shoot him...... It will just make him angry.
wilbur1 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2008, 02:09 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
Konigstiger205's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Bucharest
Posts: 907
Well its not something new that Hitler was probably the allies best general
__________________
These airplanes we have today are no more than a perfection of a child's toy made of paper."Henri Coanda"
Konigstiger205 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2008, 02:22 PM   #9
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Pine Mountain Lake, California
Posts: 981
Quote:
Originally Posted by DerAdlerIstGelandet View Post
So did Hitler actually say that attacking bombers with a jet was for "Losers"?

ROFL!

Last edited by SoD Stitch; 03-07-2008 at 02:26 PM.
SoD Stitch is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2008, 02:28 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
Velius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 250
Also, I think hitler liked the idea of a fast bomber to give it a role suitable for the Blitzkreig tactics that served him well in the earlier stages of the war. Rather than expanding on these newer revolutionary aircraft, he insisted that all existing aircraft models be improved and altred in several ways to get an "ideal variant" due of their successful operational history at the break of the war.

As far as the 262 goes, there was a variant with a 50mm cannon in the nose. I wonder how effective it would've been against those bombers?
Variants: Me 262A-1a/U4
Velius is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2008, 02:45 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
Thorlifter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 4,345
If memory serves (which it probably doesn't ) the 50mm cannon was shown to be so prone to jamming that it was basically worthless. Plus the strain it put on the airframe was incredible. Or am I thinking of another big cannon they mounted to an airframe.

Heck, I can't remember. Someone help!!!!!!
__________________
Thorlifter is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2008, 02:50 PM   #12
The Pop-Tart Whisperer
 
Njaco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: South Jersey, United States
Posts: 10,236
That was later before all the fun stuff. Actually it was the engines that gave the program problems and lengthened the time it got to service.

Hitler just added icing to the cake with his obsession with dive bombers and saw a potential to keep the Allies off the beaches when the attack came by using the 262 as a bomber. He actually ordered that every few 262s produced would be a fighter. But the engines, the engines......
__________________

"If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it's English, thank a soldier!"


http://www.njcacoa.org/
Njaco is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2008, 02:58 PM   #13
Senior Member
 
Thorlifter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 4,345
I do remember that the actual combat life of the Jumo engines was only 12 hours!!!! Incredible.
__________________
Thorlifter is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2008, 02:59 PM   #14
The Pop-Tart Whisperer
 
Njaco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: South Jersey, United States
Posts: 10,236
I think 10 - 12. Still freaking limited!
__________________

"If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it's English, thank a soldier!"


http://www.njcacoa.org/
Njaco is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2008, 05:52 PM   #15
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Pine Mountain Lake, California
Posts: 981
Quote:
Originally Posted by Njaco View Post
I think 10 - 12. Still freaking limited!
Yeah, with an MTBF of around 25 hours.
SoD Stitch is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:59 PM.
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Ad Management plugin by RedTyger
Design by HTWoRKS


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118