![]() |
| |||||||
| Aviation Discussion on the aircraft of WWII. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Redding, California
Posts: 3,354
| Oldest Bomber in WWII? We got into an interesting discussion over in the IL-2 lounge about the Soviet TB-3. That got me to wondering if it might have been the oldest bomber deployed during the war. I know that some of the bombers used had thier roots reaching back a ways but thier designs had evolved to a certain degree. As far as unchanged designs go, was there a bomber that was older than the TB-3 used in action? The Tupolev TB-3 was designed in the late 20's and first flew on 22 December 1930. I checked to see if there was a thread covering this topic already, and came up empty-handed...if there is one already, let me know!
__________________ "Look back over the past, with its changing empires that rose and fell, and you can foresee the future." - Marcus Aurelius, Emperor of Rome > I Support Doug Gillis < |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Senior Member | Yea, I couldn't find one older than that, but I came close 1936 (That is an edit, I thought it was 32 and it says 36..) Why is it that Russians have the oldest bombers? Tupolev SB - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Last edited by B-17engineer; 10-17-2009 at 11:29 PM. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Senior Member | The Chinese flew them as well (already got the kit for the next GB). Though the service date only beat the B-10 being flown by the Dutch by 6 months.
__________________ "Those who forget the past are condemned to repeat it" "Those who dwell in the past, condemn the future" ![]() Last edited by vikingBerserker; 10-17-2009 at 11:45 PM. |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Redding, California
Posts: 3,354
| What's the stats on the B-10, VB?
__________________ "Look back over the past, with its changing empires that rose and fell, and you can foresee the future." - Marcus Aurelius, Emperor of Rome > I Support Doug Gillis < |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Senior Member | |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Redding, California
Posts: 3,354
| lmao...I meant post it...
__________________ "Look back over the past, with its changing empires that rose and fell, and you can foresee the future." - Marcus Aurelius, Emperor of Rome > I Support Doug Gillis < |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Senior Member | According to Combat Aircraft of WW II by Bookthrift, the first service delivery was March of 1932, but that was to the USAAC.
__________________ "Those who forget the past are condemned to repeat it" "Those who dwell in the past, condemn the future" ![]() |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Redding, California
Posts: 3,354
| The Martin B-10 looks far more modern than the TB-3!
__________________ "Look back over the past, with its changing empires that rose and fell, and you can foresee the future." - Marcus Aurelius, Emperor of Rome > I Support Doug Gillis < |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Senior Member | It does, but for an old bomber the TB-3 was not bad: 10 x 7.62 MG Bomb load: 2,200 kg (later increased to 5,800kg) Range 1,550 miles Not bad at all for an old bomber.
__________________ "Those who forget the past are condemned to repeat it" "Those who dwell in the past, condemn the future" ![]() |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Redding, California
Posts: 3,354
| But it's top speed was 122mhp...making it very vulnerable to enemy attacks and also being that slow, I wonder how it fared against AA...
__________________ "Look back over the past, with its changing empires that rose and fell, and you can foresee the future." - Marcus Aurelius, Emperor of Rome > I Support Doug Gillis < |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Senior Member | Apparently not very well. According to Tupolev The Man and his Aircraft page 44, It did well against Japanese fighters during a few clashes that they had in 38, but a year later the fighters were winning most of the fights. One of the final "combat" missions it had was a pair carried 2 x I-16's fighters each armed with a 250kg bomb to destroy a railroad bridge at Chernovodsk which they did. The Chinese got 6 of them from the Soviets, but I've yet to find any info on them.
__________________ "Those who forget the past are condemned to repeat it" "Those who dwell in the past, condemn the future" ![]() |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Lazio
Posts: 806
| There are some old biplane bombers used from RAF |
| | |
| | #13 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Dordrecht
Posts: 3,834
| Quote:
__________________ ![]() " The knack of flying lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss." | |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: niagara falls
Posts: 5,588
| The Fairey Fox which flew for the Belgium's was also of 1926 vintage |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,994
| Breguet 19 in my opinion. First flown 1923, entered squadron service in 1924, final French delivery in 1932, but continued to be built under licence in Yugoslavia until 1938. Remained in service with the Yugolslavs until 1941, then surivors were transferred to the Croat air force. In 1945, two were captured by Tito and used in the final offensives. The Turks also used quite a number of them, and they remained in service until 1945 as well. The Portuguese used a bomber version of the Ju52, dating back to 1931 as I recall. The Persians used Hawker Hinds and Audaxes which were pretty ancient and then of course there was the Vickwer Vildebeestes used against the italians in Abyssinnia
__________________ Do not judge on abilities, but on choices |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |