ADS NOT DISPLAYED TO REGISTERED USERS.
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 23
Like Tree1Likes

Operation Pike

Aviation Discuss Operation Pike in the World War II - Aviation forums; Crazy idea from Bomber Command or realistic?...

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    884
    Country
    Brazil

    Operation Pike

    Crazy idea from Bomber Command or realistic?


  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    498
    Crazy if you ask me, I doubt 1940 bombers could do that much damage to oil, but it could potentially bring the USSR into the war against the Allies.. from that point, the war is unwinnable for Allies IMHO. Or else: doubtful win and everything to loose..

  3. #3
    Senior Member davebender's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Michigan, USA
    Posts
    5,236
    Country
    United States

    Diplomatically unrealistic

    France signed a military alliance with the Soviet Union during May 1935.

    From 1939 onward Britain began negotiations to join the Franco-Russian military alliance. Churchill was one of the major proponents of such an alliance with Stalin.

    Under historical circumstances there's no way the governments of Britain and France would allow Operation Pike to be executed. It was simply a contingency plan in case the German-Soviet Nonaggression Pact morphed into a military alliance.

    If Germany and the Soviet Union did become military allies (however unlikely) Britain and France would have more important things to worry about then the implementation of Operation Pike. The first Soviet operation would probably be an invasion of Iran.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    High Wycombe, England (home of the Mosquito)
    Posts
    531
    Country
    England
    I'm sorry, but you'll need to give us lesser mortals a bit more to go on; I've never heard of "Operation Pike," there's no mention of it in any of my encyclopedias, and there's not a single file, on the subject, in our National Archives.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    1,146
    Country
    United States
    Quote Originally Posted by Edgar Brooks View Post
    I'm sorry, but you'll need to give us lesser mortals a bit more to go on; I've never heard of "Operation Pike," there's no mention of it in any of my encyclopedias, and there's not a single file, on the subject, in our National Archives.
    Google is your friend, Operation Pike - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    884
    Country
    Brazil
    Patrick R. Osborn, Operation Pike: Britain Versus the Soviet Union, 1939-1941

    This groundbreaking study reveals the extent of British military planning against the Soviet Union during the first two years of the Second World War. These plans, formulated on the widespread belief that Soviet Russia was an active and willing partner in Adolf Hitler's war of conquest, were designed to bring the Soviets to their knees and deprive Nazi Germany of vital raw materials, especially oil. Churchill himself was one of the leading proponents of action that would have led to an Anglo-Soviet conflict even as the war with Germany raged on. Utilizing many never-before published documents, Osborn challenges conventional wisdom that Allied hopes were pinned on a Soviet entry into the war against Germany and proposes instead that, had the Nazis not successfully invaded France in May 1940, the Allies might well have launched their own offensive against the Soviet Union. Anti-Soviet rumblings began shortly after the Red Army seized eastern Poland in September 1939, and became more strident after Joseph Stalin invaded Finland later that year. Truly serious planning did not take place, however, until after Stalin's disastrous war with Finland ended in March 1940. Immediately following the abrupt end of that conflict the Red Army sent substantial reinforcements to the Black Sea region, the area most threatened by Allied attack. In March-April 1940, the British undertook secret reconnaissance flights to obtain photographs of important targets inside the Soviet Union. The swift collapse of France in May 1940 insured that British bombers were not launched against these targets, but suspicion lingered between Britain and the USSR throughout the war, contributing to Stalin's refusal to believe Winston Churchill's warnings that Hitler was preparing to invade the USSR in 1941.

    http://www.amazon.com/Operation-Pike.../dp/0313313687

    Seems to be an interesting book.
    Last edited by Jenisch; 01-17-2012 at 01:41 PM.

  7. #7
    Senior Member davebender's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Michigan, USA
    Posts
    5,236
    Country
    United States

    British military planning against the Soviet Union

    1939 Britain made a pledge to defend Poland from attack. If they had any intention to fight the Soviet Union Britain would have honored that pledge by declaring war on the Soviet Union during September 1939.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    pound va
    Posts
    1,694
    Country
    United States
    There was a secret protocol in the Anglo-Polish treaty that if Poland was attacked by a European power , that power was understood to be Germany.

    That protocol was so secret the Polish ambassador in London evidently wasn't let in on that secret even. It should be noted Poland never declared war on the USSR for the invasion, and instructed it's troops on the eastern borders to retreat, and not fire on them.

    The Polish ambassador, Raczyniski. was wanting the British to declare war on the USSR, when his own country wouldn't.

  9. #9
    Senior Member davebender's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Michigan, USA
    Posts
    5,236
    Country
    United States

    Poland never declared war on the USSR

    The USSR invaded Poland Sep 17, 1939. By then it was obvious Britain had welshed on the assistance pledge. Under such circumstances Poland had nothing to gain by declaring war on the Soviet Union.

    If Britain had assisted France to invade Germany during September 1939 rather then urging France to call off the Saar invasion perhaps Poland might have decided differently.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Japan
    Posts
    914
    Quote Originally Posted by davebender View Post
    The USSR invaded Poland Sep 17, 1939. By then it was obvious Britain had welshed on the assistance pledge. Under such circumstances Poland had nothing to gain by declaring war on the Soviet Union.

    If Britain had assisted France to invade Germany during September 1939 rather then urging France to call off the Saar invasion perhaps Poland might have decided differently.
    Some odd logic here.

    Britain "welshed" on its assistance pledge? How? Between 01-Sep-1939 and 17-Sep-1939, Britain declared war on Germany, sent better than 40,000 men across the Channel and a dozen bomber squadrons, commenced leaflet raids against Hamburg, Bremen and The Ruhr and bombing against the German fleet in Wilhelmshaven and Brunsbuttel and lost a bloody aircraft carrier!

    As it was French troops committed to the Saar offensive, it was a French decision to call off the offensive. The French military posture at the time was defensive in nature, a strategy that suited the British as the BEF wouldn't finish deploying into France until late September.

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    884
    Country
    Brazil
    Quote Originally Posted by Jabberwocky View Post
    The French military posture at the time was defensive in nature, a strategy that suited the British as the BEF wouldn't finish deploying into France until late September.
    Yeah, but they betrayed the Poles in doing so.

    In fact the French and the British were still in mobilization, and as Op. Pike shows, they also feared a Soviet agression. Perhaps this was a major reason in the mobilization delay?

  12. #12
    Senior Member davebender's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Michigan, USA
    Posts
    5,236
    Country
    United States

    French military posture at the time was defensive in nature

    26 Aug 1939. French Army partial mobilization.
    1 Sep 1939. French Army complete mobilization.
    3 Sep 1939. France declares war on Germany.
    7 Sep 1939. 11 French division (i.e. a complete field army) invade Germany along a 20 mile front.

    Looks pretty aggressive to me.

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    pound va
    Posts
    1,694
    Country
    United States
    What else could Britain do, but what they did ?

    Could they load their army on Royal Navy ships, battle their way thru to the Baltic sea, to Poland?? Sounds like a recipe for a disaster to me.

    The threat of a war with Britain, it's empire, and France you think would be enough to hold Hitler. But he thought he could gobble up another country like he did Czechoslovakia, everybody would talk rough, but do nothing.

    Probably nobody was as surprized as Hitler when he realized he had pushed things just a little too far.

  14. #14
    Senior Member davebender's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Michigan, USA
    Posts
    5,236
    Country
    United States

    What else could Britain do

    Summer 1939.
    Aldershot Command, British Army, 03.09.1939
    Move the army corps from Aldershot training area to France so it can participate in a French invasion of Germany.
    .....1st Infantry Division.
    .....2nd Infantry Division.
    .....1st Armored Brigade.

    Move Number 11 Fighter Group from Uxbridge, Middlesex to France so it can support the BEF.

    Now people will take the British assistance pledge (to Poland) seriously. It's entirely possible this deployment would deter invasion of Poland during September 1939. But if it doesn't Britain would be ready to back up their assistance pledge with military support.

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    High Wycombe, England (home of the Mosquito)
    Posts
    531
    Country
    England
    In a time of peace (however fragile) it can't be done, without the invitation of the host country, otherwise the British become an invading force. 11 Group was an area, not a force, so its 1939 job was to defend Britain, not go on the attack.
    The idea of going to Poland's aid, directly, is also a non-starter; only a fool would try to send troops (how, with no troopships or transport aircraft?) and insert them between allies, leaving the possibility of having to fight on two fronts, with food and ammunition replenishments almost impossible to arrange.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. This day in the war in Europe 65 years ago
    By syscom3 in forum WW2 General
    Replies: 1458
    Last Post: 01-21-2011, 07:17 PM
  2. Which country had the best radar/ Aerial protection system?
    By Soundbreaker Welch? in forum Radar
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 09-21-2009, 05:26 PM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-15-2009, 02:25 AM
  4. This is bad
    By thewritingwriter89 in forum Modern
    Replies: 49
    Last Post: 01-09-2009, 11:06 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86