 | P-40 vs. Hurricane| Aviation Discuss P-40 vs. Hurricane in the World War II - Aviation forums; Well since we have all come to the conclusion that the P-40 was to the US as the Hurricane ... |
|
09-25-2005, 06:53 AM
|
#1 | | Der Crewchief
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 28,590
Country: | P-40 vs. Hurricane Well since we have all come to the conclusion that the P-40 was to the US as the Hurricane was to the British lets see what is the baddest of the underated old hags!
__________________ US Army Blackhawk Crewchief 2000-2006 Classic ww2aircraft.net quotes: fly boy said: "isn't that the first jet bomber? becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles" "wait what ok who made the b-2 crash come on people that messed up its a b-2" "ah yes the mistel those things are so annoying is games and in real life" |
| |
09-25-2005, 06:58 AM
|
#2 | | Konfused with a 'K'
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Turin, Italy
Posts: 20,412
Country: | Id have to say the Hurricane was better than the P-40.. 
__________________ with my one last gaping breath id apologise for bleeding on your shirt... |
| |
09-25-2005, 07:02 AM
|
#3 | | Der Crewchief
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 28,590
Country: | I do not have an opinion on the 2 yet.
For historical reasons I am leaning at the Hurricane.
__________________ US Army Blackhawk Crewchief 2000-2006 Classic ww2aircraft.net quotes: fly boy said: "isn't that the first jet bomber? becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles" "wait what ok who made the b-2 crash come on people that messed up its a b-2" "ah yes the mistel those things are so annoying is games and in real life" |
| |
09-25-2005, 07:37 AM
|
#4 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Royal Deeside/St Andrews, Scotland, UK (atm Pretoria, South Africa)
Posts: 10,823
Country: | I prefer the Hurricane, it did well in the Battle of Britain and was upgraded and become a ground attack aircraft amoung other incarnations.
__________________ "Success is not Final, Failure is not Fatal, it is the Courage to Continue that Counts"
Sir Winston Churchill "To him the people of the world largely owe the Freedom and liberties they enjoy today"
Enscription on Hugh Dowding's (AOC Fighter Command 1936-40) statue in London Moderator WW2 Talk: A WW2 Discussion Forum |
| |
09-25-2005, 07:43 AM
|
#5 | | Minister of Whoopass
Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Long Island Native in Mississippi
Posts: 12,536
Country: | Look at what the P-40 did in Africa and the PTO with Chennault and the Tigers...
__________________ "Boyington was a Drunk, but He was a Drunk We'd Follow Straight Into Hell..."
-- Lt. William Northrop Case |
| |
09-25-2005, 09:05 AM
|
#6 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,512
| Hey look, the Brits prefer the Hurri and the Americans prefer the P-40. Wow! Never saw that one coming!
I think it would be difficult to pick a clear cut winner. Performance was similar and low and medium altitudes (above that the Hurri would be preferred except perhaps against the Merlin-engined P-40F). What I have seen suggests the Hurri was more maneuverable. P-40 probably has the edge in a dive and in firepower.
__________________ |
| |
09-25-2005, 09:09 AM
|
#7 | | IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 12,518
Country: | Quote: |
Originally Posted by Lightning Guy Hey look, the Brits prefer the Hurri and the Americans prefer the P-40. Wow! Never saw that one coming!
I think it would be difficult to pick a clear cut winner. Performance was similar and low and medium altitudes (above that the Hurri would be preferred except perhaps against the Merlin-engined P-40F). What I have seen suggests the Hurri was more maneuverable. P-40 probably has the edge in a dive and in firepower. | Said perfectly - besides, the Brits bought P-40s, that says something! :P
__________________ "IF ITS RED OR DUSTY, DON'T TOUCH IT" |
| |
09-25-2005, 09:26 AM
|
#8 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: London
Posts: 2,760
| We also took the Buffalo, which simply proves that desperate times bring desperate measures. |
| |
09-25-2005, 09:38 AM
|
#9 | | He who does not skim
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Posts: 8,957
Country: | Are you actually comparing the P-40 with the Buffalo? |
| |
09-25-2005, 09:40 AM
|
#10 | | IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 12,518
Country: | Quote: |
Originally Posted by Glider We also took the Buffalo, which simply proves that desperate times bring desperate measures. | I know, just kidding!
I think we're all going to stick to our nationalistic lines on this one. I'd go with the P-40, roll rate, dive speed and and ruggedness (although I give the Hurricane high marks on that). I think speeds at low altitude will be about the same, the Hurricane has it at altitude and probably acceleration. Maintainability - I'd give it mainly to the Hurricane, fabric is easy to fix but deteroriates.
Does anyone have information of RAF Hurricane Squadrons converting to the P-40 or visa versa?!?
__________________ "IF ITS RED OR DUSTY, DON'T TOUCH IT" |
| |
09-25-2005, 10:01 AM
|
#11 | | Your ad here. ;)
Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Moorpark, CA
Posts: 12,147
Country: | Well, call me a free-thinker, if you like, but I would go for the Hurricane on this one.
__________________ http://www.vg-photo.com Wherever their bones may lie, the courage of heroes is consecrated in the hearts and engraved in the history of the free. Lt Col Honner DSO MC, 39th Commander speaking of the dead from the battle of Kokoda. |
| |
09-25-2005, 10:17 AM
|
#12 | | Member
Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: southampton
Posts: 73
| Heya flyboy,
616 RAF squadron (South Yorkshire) flew hurricanes and then kittyhawks.
268 squadron flew spits and then kittyhawks, so if you rate the spit then the kittyhawk must have been ok. |
| |
09-25-2005, 10:20 AM
|
#13 | | Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 191
| Depends upon how you compare them. Best model of each? I'd go with the P-40 since it was quite a bit faster (30-40 mph) and speed is life. By year? I'd go with the Hurricane since it reached its best model (the IIC) while the P-40 was still in its early incarnations. The Hurc turned better, the P-40 dived and rolled better. The P-40 was tougher. Hard call on this one.
I think the P-40's did better against the Luftwaffe' in Africa than the Hurcs did? Anyone got any info on this?
=S=
Lunatic |
| |
09-25-2005, 12:17 PM
|
#14 | | IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 12,518
Country: | Thanks bader! There is a site about the P-40 that tells of it's success aganist the Luftwaffe. I'll post it here soon. I'm on my way to a wedding
__________________ "IF ITS RED OR DUSTY, DON'T TOUCH IT" |
| |
09-25-2005, 12:39 PM
|
#15 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,281
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by Lunatic Depends upon how you compare them. Best model of each? I'd go with the P-40 since it was quite a bit faster (30-40 mph) and speed is life. By year? I'd go with the Hurricane since it reached its best model (the IIC) while the P-40 was still in its early incarnations. The Hurc turned better, the P-40 dived and rolled better. The P-40 was tougher. Hard call on this one.
I think the P-40's did better against the Luftwaffe' in Africa than the Hurcs did? Anyone got any info on this?
=S=
Lunatic | I believe the P-40 did a better job than the Hurricane in Africa, considerably so actually.
I know for a fact that the RAF's Spit's and Hurri's had a real tough time against the 109'
s during the African campaign, while the P-40 had less of a problem with them.
Anyways I'd go with the P-40, although its a tough decision.
__________________ We have built a total of about 1250 of this aircraft (Me-262), but only fifty were allowed to be used as fighters - as interceptors. And out of this fifty, there were never more than 25 operational. So we had only a very, very few.
- Adolf Galland |
| | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:16 PM. |  | |