Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums
 



Go Back   Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums > World War II - Aviation > Aviation

Aviation Discussion on the aircraft of WWII.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-24-2005, 12:14 AM   #1
Senior Member
 
DAVIDICUS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 819
P-47N Thunderbolt vs. F4U-4 Corsair - Which was superior?

I'm curious which of these were better in the air to air role and why.
__________________
.
-=DAVIDICUS MAXIMUS=-
.
DAVIDICUS is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2005, 02:36 AM   #2
"Shooter"
 
evangilder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Moorpark, CA
Posts: 14,803
Send a message via Yahoo to evangilder
I'd have to go with the Corsair in air to air engagements on this one. They were both capable air to air fighters, but the Jug was bigger and heavier. The Corsair was designed using the biggest possible engine in the smallest possible airframe.

The original specification on the Jug, interestingly, called for a small, lightweight fighter! The November 2004 edition of Air Classics has a great article on the Jug.
__________________


http://www.vg-photo.com

For once you have tasted flight you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skywards, for there you have been and there you will long to return. Leonardo Da Vinci
evangilder is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2005, 06:22 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
DAVIDICUS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 819
The P-47 had the top speed, roll rate, dive speed, armament and protective armor advantages. The P-47 had a high altitude advantage in general performance.

The F4-U had the manueverability and the climb rate advantage. The F4-U had a low and medium altitude advantage in general performance.

Any disagreement on these attributes?
__________________
.
-=DAVIDICUS MAXIMUS=-
.
DAVIDICUS is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2005, 06:52 PM   #4
"Shooter"
 
evangilder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Moorpark, CA
Posts: 14,803
Send a message via Yahoo to evangilder
They were both excellent aircraft. In a pure air to air role, I would think the Corsair would have the edge.
__________________


http://www.vg-photo.com

For once you have tasted flight you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skywards, for there you have been and there you will long to return. Leonardo Da Vinci
evangilder is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2005, 07:08 PM   #5
Anonymous
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
They were designed for different things. The P-47N was a long range escort plane, the F4U-4 was a patrol/interceptor. The P-47N probably had the advantage above 30,000 feet, the F4U-4 below 30,000 feet. The P-47N had more firepower, the F4U-4 was a little tougher.

Very hard call.

=S=

Lunatic
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2005, 08:31 PM   #6
"Shooter"
 
evangilder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Moorpark, CA
Posts: 14,803
Send a message via Yahoo to evangilder
They were both excellent ground support aircraft as well.
__________________


http://www.vg-photo.com

For once you have tasted flight you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skywards, for there you have been and there you will long to return. Leonardo Da Vinci
evangilder is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2005, 12:46 AM   #7
Senior Member
 
R Leonard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Virginia
Posts: 490
. . . but you could land a Corsair on a carrier.
__________________
hmmm ... I wonder what this switch does ...
R Leonard is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2005, 04:07 AM   #8
Anonymous
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by R Leonard
. . . but you could land a Corsair on a carrier.
Sure, but the P-47N had 1000 mile greater range. Kinda fits since the P-47N was a USAAF plane, where the F4U-4 was a USN plane. They were designed for different roles.

=S=

Lunatic
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2005, 04:15 AM   #9
Senior Member
 
Soren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,107
In a Dogfight, it would defidently be the Corsair !

It could climb faster and it was more maneuverable, plus against the P-47 the F4U Corsair had the rare advantage of being able to out-turn the P-47

The best thing the P-47 could hope fore against a F4U Corsair, would be a head on attack or, that there was enough altitude to let it dive away from harms way. (Almost nothing could follow a P-47 in a dive !)
__________________

It was like being pushed by an Angel!
- Adolf Galland

I'm an educated engineer, so I love being technical and appraising of great inventions. So if you think I am being biased about something: Tell me! Then you'll probably find out that I am not
Soren is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2005, 10:43 AM   #10
"Shooter"
 
evangilder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Moorpark, CA
Posts: 14,803
Send a message via Yahoo to evangilder
Quote:
Originally Posted by R Leonard
. . . but you could land a Corsair on a carrier.
That is true, but a majority of Corsair missions were flown from land bases. When it finally was able to land on the carrier, it was still a difficult task due to that long nose.
__________________


http://www.vg-photo.com

For once you have tasted flight you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skywards, for there you have been and there you will long to return. Leonardo Da Vinci
evangilder is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2005, 02:12 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
the lancaster kicks ass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 19,945
Send a message via MSN to the lancaster kicks ass
i honestly don't know who would win but i'd kinda want the P-47 to win, a very good thread here, shud be some good disscussion...........
__________________

"Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy."
the lancaster kicks ass is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2005, 04:10 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: WSM, England
Posts: 20,387
Send a message via AIM to cheddar cheese Send a message via MSN to cheddar cheese
I know id rather be in a P-47N...
cheddar cheese is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2005, 05:37 PM   #13
Anonymous
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soren
In a Dogfight, it would defidently be the Corsair !

It could climb faster and it was more maneuverable, plus against the P-47 the F4U Corsair had the rare advantage of being able to out-turn the P-47

The best thing the P-47 could hope fore against a F4U Corsair, would be a head on attack or, that there was enough altitude to let it dive away from harms way. (Almost nothing could follow a P-47 in a dive !)
Umm... the P-47 was fast into the dive, but a number of planes could dive faster. The Corsair and the P-47 were about equal in initial dive performance (both are very heavy planes) and the Corsair was actually faster (550 mph) under a high degree of pilot control.

In general I'd agree, the F4U-4 probably would have the advantage, but it'd be slight. And the P-47N had TWICE the firepower of the F4U-4, which is a huge factor. Near the end of WWII P-47N's chewed up Franks flown by two of Japan's few remaining ace squadrons, over Korea. One relatively rookie pilot, Oscar F. Perdomo, scored 5 kills that day, becomming the last "Ace in a day" in history.

http://www.elknet.pl/acestory/perdomo/perdomo.htm

=S=

Lunatic
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2005, 06:45 PM   #14
Senior Member
 
DAVIDICUS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 819
RG_Lunatic,

What is your source regarding your statement, "Umm... the P-47 was fast into the dive, but a number of planes could dive faster. The Corsair and the P-47 were about equal in initial dive performance (both are very heavy planes) and the Corsair was actually faster (550 mph) under a high degree of pilot control."

In addition, what is your source for your statement, "And the P-47N had TWICE the firepower of the F4U-4, which is a huge factor."

I am certain the latter of your above statements is incorrect and interested to find out if my understanding concerning the former is incorrect.
__________________
.
-=DAVIDICUS MAXIMUS=-
.
DAVIDICUS is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2005, 01:24 AM   #15
Anonymous
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by DAVIDICUS
RG_Lunatic,

What is your source regarding your statement, "Umm... the P-47 was fast into the dive, but a number of planes could dive faster. The Corsair and the P-47 were about equal in initial dive performance (both are very heavy planes) and the Corsair was actually faster (550 mph) under a high degree of pilot control."

In addition, what is your source for your statement, "And the P-47N had TWICE the firepower of the F4U-4, which is a huge factor."

I am certain the latter of your above statements is incorrect and interested to find out if my understanding concerning the former is incorrect.
The P-47 was fast in its initial dive acceleration because it was heavy and had a large engine. But its critical mach level is lower than a number of other planes, and compression limited its maximum dive speed. The Corsair was able to dive at speeds up to 550 mph IAS, which is faster than the max IAS of the P-47.

The P-47N got the .50 M3, which fired at 1200 rpm. That means the ROF was the equivalent of 12 x .50 M2's, double the 6 x M2's on the Corsair. Somewhere I have records of the M3's being delivered to Iwo Shima and one other base, both of which were P-47N bases. Also, pilot comments can be found refering to the faster rate of fire on the P-47N guns.

=S=

Lunatic
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:58 PM.
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Ad Management plugin by RedTyger
Design by HTWoRKS


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118