Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums

Paddle blade P-47 and P-38J

Aviation Discuss Paddle blade P-47 and P-38J in the World War II - Aviation forums; Jank... Though the paddle helped the '47 a great deal, it still could not climb with the '38 through most ...


Go Back   Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums > World War II - Aviation > Aviation

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 03-13-2006, 11:34 AM   #46
Senior Member
 
JonJGoldberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: NEW YORK, NEW YORK
Posts: 210
Jank...

Though the paddle helped the '47 a great deal, it still could not climb with the '38 through most of their flight envelopes, as shown in the previous posts, especially below 25K. I still would rather a '47, as a sim (... I forgot to put the 'sim' in) pilot. As a sim (... that would be twice) commander, I need to know the roll you envision then I could (... so I decided to change this as well, to avoid yet another 'edit') decide.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg p_40c_jjgscfs_2_timetofly_rev_3_021_flygirl_347.jpg (13.1 KB, 94 views)
JonJGoldberg is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2007, 06:40 PM   #47
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 1
Country:
Corrections

Quote:
Originally Posted by FLYBOYJ View Post
YEP!!!!

Folks - been reading this thread and observing interesting discussion, but I'm gonna throw my 2 cents in here...going to get 7 minutes to 20,000 feet at best rate of climb (Vx) - period. .......
Just to make sure we have the correct $ .02, VX is best ANGLE of climb - best Rate of climb is Vy.


From WMAXT's post:

...This is true, the POH is designed to be achiveable by any aircraft on the line with an average pilot. BTW thats why I added the note on the graph it is almost identicle to the POH for the P-38J/L in military power. Remember to, the POH does not include WEP numbers probably because they can vary so much.


//Quote:
Originally Posted by FLYBOYJ
If tests were done at places like Wright Patterson that got different data, someone felt it wasn't significant enough to place in the -1.....

Actualy, I belive, in many cases it was factored in to create the average for the POH. Something else that must be considered is air quality - density, moisture content ect. the chart above being performed by Lockheed will be on the west coast where ideal flying conditions exist. Many of the AAF tests were at Eglin Field where conditions vary wildly and humiditity is on the average higher than other locations. With the P-38 or other turbocharged aircraft this can affect turbo speeds and effectiveness greatly. // Endquote.

Shouldn't make a difference where tests are done. The chart posted doesn't take into account atmosphere, but shows altitude. This will be Density Altitude. The pilots should be calulating Density altitude and applying the charts as appropriate.

Cheers
Bruce.
Bruce W is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
   

AVIATION TOP 100 - www.avitop.com Avitop.com


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92