Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums
 



Go Back   Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums > World War II - Aviation > Aviation

Aviation Discussion on the aircraft of WWII.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-02-2008, 07:48 PM   #61
Senior Member
 
thewritingwriter89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: In a small space capsule
Posts: 113
Quote:
Originally Posted by HoHun View Post

(With regard to the 'trim due to flaps automatically corrected' bit: The Me 110 actually changed the tailplane incidence in unison with the flap movement to achieve just that. Normal elevator trim was achieved by trim tabs, only the compensation for flap deflection was achived by moving the tailplane.
So in other words, the normal "nose down" response from lowering flaps is counteracted by an increase in "pitch up" elevator trim?
__________________


From the movie "Battle of Britain"

'How much longer? The engine is overheating, and so am I. Either we stand down or blow up. Which do you want?'

-the great Michael Caine
thewritingwriter89 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2008, 11:31 PM   #62
IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO
 
FLYBOYJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 16,051
Quote:
Originally Posted by pbfoot View Post
Ok here the 109 numbers
22" or . 55.6cm from canopy rail to canopy rail inside
32" or 81.5cm from back of seat to instrument panel
21" or 53cm from front of seat to rudder pedals
15.5" or 39.7cm from top of seat to top inside of canopy
30" 0r 76cm from bottom of seat to " " "
sorry I didn't get the other ones today
Thanks Neil!
__________________
"IF ITS RED OR DUSTY, DON'T TOUCH IT"
FLYBOYJ is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2008, 11:33 PM   #63
IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO
 
FLYBOYJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 16,051
Quote:
Originally Posted by thewritingwriter89 View Post
So in other words, the normal "nose down" response from lowering flaps is counteracted by an increase in "pitch up" elevator trim?
Correct - like most other aircraft as well.
__________________
"IF ITS RED OR DUSTY, DON'T TOUCH IT"
FLYBOYJ is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2008, 09:41 PM   #64
Senior Member
 
Lucky13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: A Swede living in Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 15,144
How did the gun sights compare to each other then?
__________________

JAN "Felicis Tredecim"
"I´m going back to the front to relax"
"THE BLACK CATS FLIES TONIGHT"
"Find your enemy and shoot him down - everything else is unimportant!"
"When you're out of F-8's... You're out of fighters!"

Lucky13 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2008, 02:26 AM   #65
Senior Member
 
Soundbreaker Welch?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 1,893
I'd like to sit in the back of a B-17 and go to sleep.....zzzzzz.....


naw, just kidding. I would have to be awake looking out for fighters.
__________________

"His motor's conked out!"
"What's the differance, they're all Nazis!"
"Luke, shut up!"
"Fear the hook!"
"Oh.....I wanna fly."
"You mean the kind that go under water and fly up the stairs?"
"What you doing? Oh Nooooo!"
Soundbreaker Welch? is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2008, 10:50 AM   #66
IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO
 
FLYBOYJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 16,051
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucky13 View Post
How did the gun sights compare to each other then?
As far as view or obstructing view?
__________________
"IF ITS RED OR DUSTY, DON'T TOUCH IT"
FLYBOYJ is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2008, 12:54 PM   #67
Senior Member
 
Lucky13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: A Swede living in Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 15,144
View, obstruction of view, accuracy etc. etc....
__________________

JAN "Felicis Tredecim"
"I´m going back to the front to relax"
"THE BLACK CATS FLIES TONIGHT"
"Find your enemy and shoot him down - everything else is unimportant!"
"When you're out of F-8's... You're out of fighters!"

Lucky13 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2008, 01:19 PM   #68
IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO
 
FLYBOYJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 16,051
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucky13 View Post
View, obstruction of view, accuracy etc. etc....
As far as accuracy - I think we could start another thread on the best gun sights if we haven't already.

As far as obstruction - well I have a perspective. I had an opportunity to fly an L-29 with an active gun sight. It was pretty massive and seemed to take up the whole windshield. My "instructor" just told me to "look beyond it." After a while it seemed like it wasn't even there!

By all means it is easier to see without any sight in front of you. Here's a photo of what i was talking about.

__________________
"IF ITS RED OR DUSTY, DON'T TOUCH IT"
FLYBOYJ is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2008, 01:30 AM   #69
Senior Member
 
kool kitty89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 2,412
I think the German fighters had their sights offset (usually off to the right) to allow better foreward visibility.

I immagine the worst would probably be the telescopic sights on some aircraft in the early part of the war. (some USN/USMC aircraft, notably the F2A, TBD, and SBD as well as some Japanese aircraft, particularly in the IJA)
Some aircrsft still using iron sights might have been even worse.
kool kitty89 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2008, 12:28 PM   #70
Senior Member
 
Soren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,114
Take a look at the control stick/column, looks like the German WW2 fighter control column.
__________________

It was like being pushed by an Angel!
- Adolf Galland

I'm an educated engineer, so I love being technical and appraising of great inventions. So if you think I am being biased about something: Tell me! Then you'll probably find out that I am not
Soren is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2008, 05:28 PM   #71
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,765
Hi Koolkitty,

>I think the German fighters had their sights offset (usually off to the right) to allow better foreward visibility.

The offset to the right reportedly was to optimize the sight for right-eye dominant pilots (which obviously were considered the norm).

To improve forward visiblity and to protect the pilot in the case of a crash, the gunsight in the Me 109 would be pivoted to the right, out of sight and out of the danger zone if the pilot's head struck the panel in the case of a rapid deceleration.

Just a detail, but one I consider excellently designed ... reflector plates were infamous for the injuries they could cause.

Attached a sighting diagram to show the offset. It might also be useful for finding the exact position of the pilot's eye to prepare the visiblity diagram we've been talking about.

Regards,

Henning (HoHun)
Attached Images
File Type: jpg bf109g6u4-gunnery-data1.jpg (63.5 KB, 0 views)
HoHun is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2008, 06:35 PM   #72
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: London
Posts: 3,655
Interesting statement about the eye dominance but it was a big assumption. When coaching people to shoot, the first thing I test for is to check the eye dominance. You would be suprised how many right handed people have a left eye dominance.
Glider is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2008, 07:01 PM   #73
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,765
Hi Glider,

>Interesting statement about the eye dominance but it was a big assumption. When coaching people to shoot, the first thing I test for is to check the eye dominance. You would be suprised how many right handed people have a left eye dominance.

Interesting - how does your check work?

(I guess in the 1930s, the Germans were not really into "going with the flow" ... probably they decided everyone should be right-eye dominant, or else!

Regards,

Henning (HoHun)
HoHun is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2008, 04:15 AM   #74
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: London
Posts: 3,655
There are a number of tests but the simplest one to do yourself is as follows.

a) With both eyes open put an arm out in front of you
b) Raise the thumb, line it up on a fixed point
c) Focus on the thumb, then on the fixed point in the distance
d) Without moving the arm, close one eye
e) If the thumb is still lined up on the fixed point, then that is the dominant eye.
f) Check this by opening both eyes and closing the second one.

If its the weaker eye, the thumb will appear to move to the left or right depending on which eye is dominant.
If there is no dominance the thumb will move a short distance either way depending on the eye thats open.

When teaching archery I do the same test and if someone is left eye dominant and right handed we actually teach them to shoot left handed. It harder in the short term, but in the long term they will do better shooting left handed.

Last edited by Glider; 12-09-2008 at 04:21 AM.
Glider is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2008, 11:14 AM   #75
Senior Member
 
Lucky13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: A Swede living in Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 15,144
What about radio equipment? How did Luftwaffe, RAF, USAAF etc. compare there, as in range etc.?
__________________

JAN "Felicis Tredecim"
"I´m going back to the front to relax"
"THE BLACK CATS FLIES TONIGHT"
"Find your enemy and shoot him down - everything else is unimportant!"
"When you're out of F-8's... You're out of fighters!"

Lucky13 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:10 AM.
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Ad Management plugin by RedTyger
Design by HTWoRKS


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118