ADS NOT DISPLAYED TO REGISTERED USERS.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6

R-2600 + turbo: was that ever a viable thing?

Aviation Discuss R-2600 + turbo: was that ever a viable thing? in the World War II - Aviation forums; One of the rare major US engines that was never used in a turbocharged form (not counting prototype installations, like ...

  1. #1
    Creator of Interesting Threads tomo pauk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    4,483
    Country
    Croatia

    R-2600 + turbo: was that ever a viable thing?

    One of the rare major US engines that was never used in a turbocharged form (not counting prototype installations, like the one tried at A-20). Was the turbo R-2600 ever a viable possibility, or the engine 'defied' in some way against a turbo?


  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    5,308
    Country
    United States
    I don't know. I have seen a few comments about it but nothing to back them up. I don't know of any other tries except the A-20 ( doesn't mean that they didn't exist, just not well recorded?) Why they weren't used on the P-70 night fighter is a puzzle.

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    35
    Country
    Canada
    Possibly there were teething problems that could have been solved, but did not have sufficient priority. Most of the R-2600 applications did not make any special demands on high altitude performance and it would have made sense to concentrate on larger engines, specifically the R-2800 and R-3350; these had important applications where high altitude performance was critical e.g., P-47 and B-29.

    The early turbosupercharger installations did have some control and reliability issues; for example some installations were known to have problems with surging (the Hercules VIII seems to have been one such case).

  4. #4
    Creator of Interesting Threads tomo pauk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    4,483
    Country
    Croatia
    Thanks for the inputs

    Would it be right to conclude that there was nothing special that would hamper the R-2600 + turbo in a plane?

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    5,308
    Country
    United States
    We don't really know, there are reports with no details that the A-20 with turbos had trouble. There was also a change in policy about what altitude the light/ medium bombers would operate at that meant they didn't need turbos.

    Turbos were planned for the 4 engine version of the Martin B-33 ( 400 planes ordered but all canceled before the prototype was even started)

    In theory there is nothing to prevent it but in practice things don't always work out. The Theory was that the turbo would hold the exhaust back pressure to the same value as a non-turbo plane at sea level. In practice the back pressure was always several lbs higher until well above the critical altitude. This MAY have caused problems with cooling the exhaust valve and exhaust port area of the cylinder head.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    726
    Country
    United States

    policy about what altitude the light/ medium bombers would operate

    Quote Originally Posted by Shortround6 View Post
    There was also a change in policy about what altitude the light/ medium bombers would operate at that meant they didn't need turbos.
    SR: Could you elaborate on this policy? Just curious.

+ Reply to Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86