Quote:
|
but the US outproduced Japan by a big margin during the war
|
Probably something the Japanese should have thought of before leaping over the precipice.
Discussion usually focuses on the A6M series because most of the really juicy evaluation reports are on the A6M2, 3, and 5.
Probably doesn't hurt either that A6M series (and not counting the A6M2-N), with a production of 10449 made up 32% of total Japanese fighter production. Add in the A6M2-N (327) and you get 33%. Nearest competitor was the Ki-43, with a production run of 5919; 18.1% of overall fighter production and 56% of the A6M production. And it just goes down hill from there:
Ki-84 3510 or 10.8% of fighter production
Ki-27 3399 or 10.4% of fighter production
Ki-61 2803 or 8.6% of fighter production
Ki-45 1701 or 5.2% of fighter production
N1K1,2 1435 or 4.4% of fighter production
Ki-44 1225 or 3.8% of fighter production
J1N 479 or 1.5% of fighter production
J2M 476 or 1.5% of fighter production
Ki-100 396 or 1.2% of fighter production
and
A6M2-N 1.0% of fighter production
and everything else are each less than 1% of production.
So, with the A6M by far exceeding all other fighter production, and the relatively availability of reports, it is not hard to see why there is a tendency to focus on it as opposed to others.
Rich