 | Second opinions needed about some ww2 aircraft remarks..| Aviation Discuss Second opinions needed about some ww2 aircraft remarks.. in the World War II - Aviation forums; I got to arguing about ww 2 fighter aircraft with someone on another site and I wanted to get some ... |
|
06-16-2005, 04:52 PM
|
#1 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: NYS
Posts: 2
| Second opinions needed about some ww2 aircraft remarks.. I got to arguing about ww 2 fighter aircraft with someone on another site and I wanted to get some opinions on this other fellows remarks..Could someone help me out..?
>>Many of Russia’s top air aces flew the P-39. At low altitude the P-39 could out turn the ME-109. However, above 17,000 the P-39 was mediocre due the fact its super charger was removed during production. This is why the P-39 was not successful in Britain. However, Chuck Yeager thought it was the best flying plane of the war. Russia's top air ace agreed with Yeager’s assessment of the P-39. The P-40 warhawk was another under-rated US fighter that gave the Germans fits in Africa. Like the P-39 the P-40 had excellent performance below 17,000 feet. Both these aircraft used Allison inline engines minus the supercharger.
The television show Wings voted the P-51 Mustang the best fighter of the last century. Some Mustangs even served in Vietnam.
Today at least a 100 are flying. Most of the surviving Mustangs are used as air racers.
The best handling planes of the war were probably the Spitfire and Zero. However, at speed over 300+mph the P-40 and P-39 could turn tighter than the Zero.
Best Fighters of WW2.
ME 262
Mustang
Corsair
Thunderbolt
Lightening
Hellcat
FW190
Spitfire
ME109
Zero |
| |
06-16-2005, 05:16 PM
|
#2 | | Der Crewchief
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 28,136
Country: | Okay well first of all the Russian would say anything they flew was the best aircraft to fly. The P-39 was crap, espeically at high alltitudes and without the supercharger. The P-40 was a good aircraft but was quickly outmatched by the middle of the war.
The P-51 is way overated. The later spitfires and Fw-190D were better. The P-47N was a much better aircraft then the P-51.
As for best fighters of WW2. The Me-262 had too many problems with it is engines. She was a great design and capable aircraft but needed engines! but otherwise I agree with the list.
__________________ US Army Blackhawk Crewchief 2000-2006 Classic ww2aircraft.net quotes: fly boy said: "isn't that the first jet bomber? becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles" "wait what ok who made the b-2 crash come on people that messed up its a b-2" "ah yes the mistel those things are so annoying is games and in real life" |
| |
06-17-2005, 04:53 AM
|
#3 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 12,018
Country: | Almost anything could out-turn a A6M Zero at over 300 mph. It only had it's remarkable turn rate at around 275 mph. After that it was stiff and unable to turn.
The P-40 and P-39 were both poor aircraft. The P-40 was extremely poor, the Luftwaffe over Africa enjoyed easy meat with them. In the hands of great pilots the P-40 performed well but not every pilot is great.
They'd have enjoyed the P-36 Mohawk much more over Africa.
__________________ "When you go home tomorrow, don't expect anyone to know what you have been through. Even if they did know, most people probably wouldn't care anyway. Some of you may get the medals you deserve, many more of you will not. But remember this, all of you are now members of the front-line club, and that is the most exclusive club in the world." - Lt. Col. Matthew Maer CO 1st Battalion, the Princess of Wale's Royal Regiment. Camp Abu Naji, Oct. 2004  To those in that club. |
| |
06-17-2005, 10:59 AM
|
#4 | | Konfused with a 'K'
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Turin, Italy
Posts: 20,412
Country: | P-47N, P-38L and Fw-190D are best.
__________________ with my one last gaping breath id apologise for bleeding on your shirt... |
| |
06-17-2005, 11:04 AM
|
#5 | | Der Crewchief
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 28,136
Country: | Agreed there CC.
__________________ US Army Blackhawk Crewchief 2000-2006 Classic ww2aircraft.net quotes: fly boy said: "isn't that the first jet bomber? becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles" "wait what ok who made the b-2 crash come on people that messed up its a b-2" "ah yes the mistel those things are so annoying is games and in real life" |
| |
06-17-2005, 12:55 PM
|
#6 | | Master of Ewes
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 19,959
Country: | and if the P-51 was the best fighter of the last century i'll, well, do something to horrific to write on here even!!
__________________ 
"Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy." |
| |
06-17-2005, 02:04 PM
|
#7 | | Konfused with a 'K'
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Turin, Italy
Posts: 20,412
Country: | Did an American write the report? If so its believable. If a Brit had wrote it he would have said the Spitfire.
__________________ with my one last gaping breath id apologise for bleeding on your shirt... |
| |
06-17-2005, 02:49 PM
|
#8 | | Master of Ewes
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 19,959
Country: | no because neither are the best, the best would be a modern fighter......
__________________ 
"Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy." |
| |
06-17-2005, 02:51 PM
|
#9 | | IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 12,141
Country: | Quote: |
Originally Posted by the lancaster kicks ass no because neither are the best, the best would be a modern fighter...... | Like the F-15 
__________________ "IF ITS RED OR DUSTY, DON'T TOUCH IT" |
| |
06-17-2005, 02:56 PM
|
#10 | | Master of Ewes
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 19,959
Country: | or the Su-27........
__________________ 
"Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy." |
| |
06-17-2005, 02:59 PM
|
#11 | | IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 12,141
Country: | The SU-27 doesn't have a 101-to-0 kill record 
__________________ "IF ITS RED OR DUSTY, DON'T TOUCH IT" |
| |
06-17-2005, 03:12 PM
|
#12 | | Konfused with a 'K'
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Turin, Italy
Posts: 20,412
Country: | Give me a Fokker DR.1 equipped with laser guided missiles and ill soon change that 
__________________ with my one last gaping breath id apologise for bleeding on your shirt... |
| |
06-17-2005, 03:15 PM
|
#13 | | IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 12,141
Country: | Quote: |
Originally Posted by cheddar cheese Give me a Fokker DR.1 equipped with laser guided missiles and ill soon change that  | I'd like to see that! 
__________________ "IF ITS RED OR DUSTY, DON'T TOUCH IT" |
| |
06-17-2005, 03:16 PM
|
#14 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 1,178
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by FLYBOYJ The SU-27 doesn't have a 101-to-0 kill record  | I think it's higher than that these days. Something I have to interject though my dad subscribes to "Air Force Magazine" In war games with the Indian Air Force with the SU-27s they won half or better in the last set of games. This has caused the Air Force to start examining the training, flight hours, radars etc of the airforce F-15, F-16 et al. to correct the posibility of the F-15 losing it's No. 1 status.
wmaxt |
| |
06-17-2005, 03:22 PM
|
#15 | | IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 12,141
Country: | Quote: |
Originally Posted by wmaxt Quote: |
Originally Posted by FLYBOYJ The SU-27 doesn't have a 101-to-0 kill record  | I think it's higher than that these days. Something I have to interject though my dad subscribes to "Air Force Magazine" In war games with the Indian Air Force with the SU-27s they won half or better in the last set of games. This has caused the Air Force to start examining the training, flight hours, radars etc of the airforce F-15, F-16 et al. to correct the posibility of the F-15 losing it's No. 1 status.
wmaxt | Yep - we talked about that on another thread. I work at the US Air Force Academy and heard a few things (rumours) about this;
1. The Indian pilots were just better than the US guys sent over there.
2. The US guys were tired and some were at one point sick.
3. The Indians kept violating the "hardeck" (I don't believe that)
4. The US guys played "rope-a-dope."
5. The US guys just got their butts kicked!
I think that 1 and 5 were the case, but that's my own opinion! 
__________________ "IF ITS RED OR DUSTY, DON'T TOUCH IT" |
| | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:35 PM. |  | |