ADS NOT DISPLAYED TO REGISTERED USERS.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Size of tailwheels

Aviation Discuss Size of tailwheels in the World War II - Aviation forums; Does anybody know why the tailswheels of Luftwaffe aircraft seem to be much larger than those of other nation's airplanes ...

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    168

    Size of tailwheels

    Does anybody know why the tailswheels of Luftwaffe aircraft seem to be much larger than those of other nation's airplanes thus adding more drag to the airframe?


  2. #2
    Benevolens Magister Airframes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    33,189
    Country
    United Kingdom
    Hadn't noticed they were particularly larger. For example, the Bf109 tail wheel was more or less the same as the Spitfire's, and smaller than the Hurricane's.

  3. #3
    Senior Member Wayne Little's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Adelaide Sth. Aust.
    Posts
    35,530
    Country
    Australia
    Late G-2's onwards used a slightly larger wheel than previous models but certainly doesnt seem all that much bigger than other aircraft.

  4. #4
    Banned Siegfried's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    794
    Country
    Australia
    You'll notice that Me 109G-1 and most Me 109G-2 had a retractable tailwheel. Weight growth and the resulting enlargement meant that aMe 109 lost its rtractable tailwhell as the airframe was not modified for production reasons. The retractable tail wheel did not come back in till the Me 109K4 in October 44.

    As to why it was 'large' is hard to tell, did the 109 put more weight on the wheel.

  5. #5
    Senior Member mikewint's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Lakeview, AR
    Posts
    3,358
    Country
    United States
    The non-aircraft guy puts his $.02 in: Like a car the size would depend on the stress the tire has to endure and if it is going to have to retract or not.

    Motivated, Dedicated, Lethal

  6. #6
    Senior Member Juha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Helsinki
    Posts
    3,037
    Country
    Finland
    Quote Originally Posted by mikewint View Post
    The non-aircraft guy puts his $.02 in: Like a car the size would depend on the stress the tire has to endure and if it is going to have to retract or not.
    True Mike
    one more reason was the surface of a/fs the plane was designed to use. Finns changed the very small and hard tailwheels of Brewster B-239s, optimized for carrier decks to bigger Finnish made wheels designed for wheelbarrow because of the soft airfields they had to operat from while servicing in FAF.

    Juha

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Meredith Effect and the P-51
    By Colin1 in forum Flight Test Data
    Replies: 149
    Last Post: 12-10-2012, 03:36 PM
  2. Difference between G and K model Bf.109
    By Sagittario64 in forum Aviation
    Replies: 131
    Last Post: 12-01-2011, 02:34 AM
  3. Replies: 129
    Last Post: 08-09-2009, 12:16 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86