![]() |
| |||||||
| Aviation Discussion on the aircraft of WWII. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Texas
Posts: 1,738
| Soviet fighter tactics in 1943-44 The Luftwaffe and the Focke wulf seemed to dominate many confrontations and battles on the Easern front. It seems that German aircraft was probably superior at higher altitudes and the Soviet aircraft much better down low. What type of tactics and formations did the VVS use to counter the Luftwaffe and where was the Soviets successful as far as fighter to fighter battles. I am not much interested in using superior numbers as a tactic but what would a La-5n sqadron do when fighting the Fw-190's on a numerically even scale?
__________________ ![]() 'Live Free or Die' |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Helsinki
Posts: 1,362
| Hello Amsel I have some material on Soviet fighter tactics but I’ve not now time to consult them and it’s a while ago than I read them but some general IIRC comments on Finnish experiences. Some of these things happened earlier further south were main battles were fought. One was “Kuban bookshelf” developed by A. Pokryshkin, partly thanks of the arrival of P-39s with its good radio, and put in use during the Kuban airbattles in Spring 43. The sqns were sent to front stepped to different heights. On Finnish front, tactically Soviets became dangerous in 43 but still tended to be poor shots and opened fire far too far. In 44 they were really dangerous because many of them had learned air gunnery skills. Many times Yaks operated as close escorts and La-5s/-5Fs/-5FNs as top cover. Of course there were also numerous fighter sweeps. Sometimes Soviets sent small radar directed “hunter groups” to catch lonely Finns by surprise. Sometimes Finns noted in their combat reports that Soviet 4-planes formations and pairs kept well together and worked nicely as teams. Not much but probably as least La-5FNs would try to maintain dive and zoom tactics against 190s if possible. BTW contrary to many Western pilots Soviet pilots clearly thought that 109 was more dangerous opponent than 190. They saw 190 being too heavy and so not as good as their newer fighters in vertical combat. As good points of 190 they mentioned powerful armament and sturdy structure which could take much more damage and still stay one piece than Soviet fighters. Juha |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 497
| Here's a good link on the subject. Soviet Tactics manual. Chapter from a book published in 1943
__________________ |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 2,240
| Interesting subject.
__________________ ![]() "Ivan the Terrible or Russian Achilles" Ivan Kozhedub - Hero of the USSR (x3), Order of Lenin (x2), Order of Red Banner (x7), Order of Alexander Nevsky, Order of the Great Patriotic War (x2), Order of the Red Star (x2), 62 kills during 1943-1945 |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,116
| The Bf-109 was considered a real handful for any Soviet fighter, much more so than the Fw-190. That is until the introduction of the Dora-9 which swepped aside all opposition it came across with apparent ease, including the La-7. The latest Bf-109s were superior in turn & climb performance to the latest contemporary Lavockhin & Yak fighters and faster at all alts with MW50 boost. This is according to Rechlin tests and combat reports. You can read about a thurough test of a captured La-5FN in Hans Werner Lerche's book, Luftwaffe Test Pilot.
__________________ ![]() It was like being pushed by an Angel! - Adolf Galland I'm an educated engineer, so I love being technical and appraising of great inventions. So if you think I am being biased about something: Tell me! Then you'll probably find out that I am not |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Helsinki
Posts: 1,362
| Soren there was probably something wrong with the La-5FN Lerche flow, compare his performance figures to those Soviet figures got from tests of randomly selected production a/c. Juha |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 588
| Thanks for the link, Claidemore.
__________________ |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: United States
Posts: 82
| I have read accounts which claim that the La-7 could handle efficiently the FW-190D-9 and the BF-109G/K so it would interesting to know which source is the most accurate. |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,994
| Under 5000 feet the Soviet aircraft generally held the advantage. So I imagine the Soviets would try for a turning fight, in the horizontal. Conversely Soviet fighters were under strict orders to not get into swirling melees. The idea was to protect the Sturmoviks, and then get the hell out of Dodge. If you outnumber your opponent by more than 20:1, why give them the time to bring up their reserves. You get in, support the breakthrough, and get out, Fighters were there to facilitate that basic mission, nothing else
__________________ Do not judge on abilities, but on choices |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Senior Member | Accoriding to"Combat Aircraft of WWII" by Bookthrift, pg 194 "Indeed by 1944 a general directive had gone out to the Luftwaffe units on the Eastern Front to 'avoid combat below 5,000m with Yakovlev fighter's lacking an oil cooler under the nose (ie Yak-3)!' "
__________________ "Those who forget the past are condemned to repeat it" "Those who dwell in the past, condemn the future" ![]() |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,994
| Claidmores link is very illuminating as to what the Soviets were thinking and doing to overcome the German advantages
__________________ Do not judge on abilities, but on choices |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |