Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums

Spit or ME ?? Rumors revealed and busted !

Aviation Discuss Spit or ME ?? Rumors revealed and busted ! in the World War II - Aviation forums; no by over here i meant Britain............


Go Back   Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums > World War II - Aviation > Aviation

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 12-10-2006, 12:54 PM   #91
Master of Ewes
 
the lancaster kicks ass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 19,959
Country:
Send a message via MSN to the lancaster kicks ass
no by over here i meant Britain.........
__________________

"Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy."
the lancaster kicks ass is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2006, 12:05 PM   #92
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soren View Post

MANOEUVRABILITY
SPITFIRE TURNING DIAMETER = 1,760 feet. BF 109 TURNING DIAMETER = 1,500 ft.
A Spitfire pilot will tell you the Spit could turn inside the 109. A Messerschmitt pilot will tell you the 109 could turn inside the Spitfire! The truth is that both designs were capable of turning circles that would cause the pilot to "black-out" as the blood drained from the head. The pilot who could force himself to the limits without losing consciousness would emerge the victor from a turning battle, and the Spitfire pilots had supreme faith in their machine. The British aeronautical press told them that the wings came off the 109 in a dive or in tight turns, untrue but based on some early wing failures in the 109`s predecessor the Bf108.

However the 109 had a distinct advantage in manoeuvrability and turning circle at low speeds. The design of the 109, with it's leading edge slats gave a lower stalling speed. The 109 was very forgiving if stalled, with no tendency for a stall to develop into an uncontrollable spin, something that the Spitfire was prone to. Thus a Messerschmitt pilot was more at home at low speeds than his British counterpart.

Both the Spitfire and Messerschmitt became harder to control at high speeds, with greater and greater strength needed on the control column as the speed increased. However the problem was much worse in the Messerschmitt and in the high speed fights that developed in the Battle of Britain the Spitfire had the advantage. It was found that the fabric covered ailerons of the Spitfire caused the increase in force needed on the control column due to the bulging of the fabric at high speed. When metal covered ailerons were fitted the handling of the Spitfire at high speed improved greatly. Unfortunately this discovery did not take place in time to help British pilots in the summer of 1940.
.

I do not agree with this, Spits have much lower wingloading.
Most reports says spits did turn tighter.

http://www.spitfireperformance.com/spit109turn18.gif

http://www.spitfireperformance.com/spit109turn.gif

http://www.spitfireperformance.com/bank45.gif
MH434 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2006, 01:01 PM   #93
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 215
Soren never actually gave the source for this... We are not really sure where it came from.
Chingachgook is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2006, 01:28 PM   #94
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Aquincum, Pannonia Prima
Posts: 527
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by MH434 View Post
I do not agree with this, Spits have much lower wingloading.
Most reports says spits did turn tighter.

http://www.spitfireperformance.com/spit109turn18.gif

http://www.spitfireperformance.com/spit109turn.gif

http://www.spitfireperformance.com/bank45.gif

I wouldn't put much faith into those turn diagrams. They're estimates, and they can't even get the basic data such as power outputs. The Clmax are assumed, which makes the dataset as good as any guess...

The best you can do is to dig up some British source for the Spitfire, and some German sources for the 109, preferably in comparable conditions, and then see what gives.

For the 109, there are plentyful of German sources for turn.

The British estimate gives it 206 meters for the Spitfire, and 260 meters for the 109E, at 12 000 feet or 3657 meter altitude.

A Messerschmitt company document from August 1940 gives the turn time for a 360 degree sustained turn with 5-min power as 18.92 seconds, and the turn radius as 203 meters.

The Bf 109E manual gives the smallest turn radiuses as the follows :

W/o flaps, 0 meter altitude : 170 m
W. flaps, 0 meter altitude : 125 m

W/o flaps, 6000 meter altitude : 320 m
W. flaps, 6000 meter altitude : 230 m

A particularly interesting thing is the use of combat flaps. The 109E had combat flaps, and it could use them up to fairly high airspeeds. The Spitfire flaps could be only used for landing (having only 2 positions, up and down). As seen, flaps have a very marked effect on turn radius, and it could be entirely possible that the Emil can get minimally smaller turning radiuses by using them (ie. using flaps 109E: 230m/6000m vs. Spit : 206m/3600m, and altitude has marked negative effect on turn radius)


The British give something like 24-25 seconds for the 109E, so I presume they grossly overstated turn times for the aircraft, given the German figures. I presume that is because the only Bf 109E available for evalutation for the Brits was one that was originally crashlanded and captured by the French back in 1939, who later handed over the Brits, but the aircraft was in fairly rough shape even back in the French evaluations reports which mention it's poor powerplant condition.

The British estimate give ca 18.5 seconds for the Spit, which is pretty much the same as the Bf 109E turn time. The same can be said about turn radiuses, 20-30 meter differences in turn radius is good for an 'academic' debate, but it practice you can wipe your butt with such 'advantage'.
Kurfürst is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2006, 02:29 PM   #95
Senior Member
 
Soren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,579
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chingachgook View Post
Soren never actually gave the source for this... We are not really sure where it came from.
Its from the Spitfire-community of all places buddy !

Seems even these guys agree the 109 turned tighter.

Funny isn't it ?
__________________

We have built a total of about 1250 of this aircraft (Me-262), but only fifty were allowed to be used as fighters - as interceptors. And out of this fifty, there were never more than 25 operational. So we had only a very, very few.
- Adolf Galland
Soren is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2006, 03:18 PM   #96
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 215
Soren, learn to be a bit more specific. You may have found it on their website, but who did the test, where, when etc.
Chingachgook is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2006, 03:38 PM   #97
Senior Member
 
Soren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,579
You and your tests
__________________

We have built a total of about 1250 of this aircraft (Me-262), but only fifty were allowed to be used as fighters - as interceptors. And out of this fifty, there were never more than 25 operational. So we had only a very, very few.
- Adolf Galland
Soren is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
   

AVIATION TOP 100 - www.avitop.com Avitop.com


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86