ADS NOT DISPLAYED TO REGISTERED USERS.
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 31

Swordfish and the Bismark

Aviation Discuss Swordfish and the Bismark in the World War II - Aviation forums; Hi all Dramatic footage of Kamikazi's being shot down all over seems a stark contrast to the Swordfish raids on ...

  1. #1
    Senior Member Seawitch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    London
    Posts
    131
    Country
    United Kingdom

    Swordfish and the Bismark

    Hi all
    Dramatic footage of Kamikazi's being shot down all over seems a stark contrast to the Swordfish raids on the Bismark....they sometimes came back without loss, and in the end struck the blow that doomed that Battle cruiser.
    But what does that tell us more about.....the Bismark or the Swordfish?



  2. #2
    Senior Member pbfoot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    niagara falls
    Posts
    7,635
    Country
    Canada
    The Swordfish did not have to deal with fighters, picket ships, better radar and the larger US Navy formations so not demeaning the Swordfish guys I'll assume they are glad they did not attack the US Navy in 45

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Phila, Pa
    Posts
    4,443
    Country
    United States
    The story I've heard is the Bismark's anti-aircraft guns were tracked to a director that could not track the Swordfish because they were flying below the lower level of the tracker's speed limit. Put simply, the Swordfish flew too slow for the German's to track them.

    Could be BS, but it's the story I've heard. Seems they would still be vulnerable to hand held weapons (20mm or 7.62MG fire).

  4. #4
    Senior Member Wildcat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Queensland
    Posts
    6,173
    Country
    Australia
    Have to agree with PB, if swordfish ever had to face the defences of a USN Carrier task force like the Kamikaze's did, I'm pretty sure they would have met the same fate. Saying that I believe those Swordfish crews were some brave men, taking on Battleships in old obsolete bi-planes would require nerves of steel.

  5. #5
    Senior Member trackend's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Canvey Island, Essex
    Posts
    4,040
    Country
    England
    You are quite right guys against more modern aircraft the Stringbags did tend to always come off worse conversely as Seawitch pointed out there lack of speed gave them some advantages It is true that the Bismark's AA gunnery control was not rated for aircraft that flew at such low speeds as the Swordfish (around only 80-90 knots at torpedo launch speed) but that still left all of the weapons fired through open sights (20mm 40mm etc) able to take on the aircraft.
    Taranto was one of those occasion that showed used in the right conditions and with the element of surprise (and a determined crew) even out moded aircraft could punch way above there capabilities conversely badly deployed (the channel dash) it was a sitting duck for more modern machines.
    One thing that the lack of speed gave the Stringbag, was a very stable weapons platform even when used for dive bombing with a limited dive speed of only 200knts doing anti tank duties in north Africa made the plane surprisingly effective.
    Also when posted to the Woolworths carriers on convoy work having such a slow stooging speed made them really useful anti submarine aircraft.
    The overall shipping kills made by these out of date aircraft was amongst the highest or any plane during the war and that includes the most up to date planes of the day so although there are lots of threads on this site that ask for opinions as to the best bomber,fighter etc best does not always equate to most effective.

    Just as an add on here are 2 pieces of fabric from one of the Swordfish used in the film Sink the Bismark the signatures are 4 guys who took part in the actual Bismark raid
    D.A.Bunce, Lt P.D.Gick, PO L.D Sayer & Lt Cdr P.B.Meadway
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Swordfish and the Bismark-sb-002.jpg   Swordfish and the Bismark-sb-001.jpg  

    Last edited by trackend; 06-22-2007 at 01:45 AM. Reason: images added

  6. #6
    Senior Member Seawitch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    London
    Posts
    131
    Country
    United Kingdom
    Hi All
    Well, i bet they were glad they weren't attacking the American Fleet in '45, perhaps I should have asked environment as well as Swordfish or Bismark.
    The account of the Bismark's air defence system amazes me.
    Such a modern ship built to face an enemy who had only one Torpedo plane that could engage it anywhere........the Swordfish.
    Somebody should have been shotz!

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Louisville, KY
    Posts
    119
    Country
    United States
    Shotz, HELL, sunk! Oh wait, that's what happened, never mind. I watch that movie about once every two months, along with The Dam Busters and BoB, just to hear Merlins.

  8. #8
    Senior Member trackend's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Canvey Island, Essex
    Posts
    4,040
    Country
    England
    If you want to hear them again Glen heres some statics I videoed a couple of years ago down load the merlin/griffon video
    .http://www.ww2aircraft.net/forum/avi...os-1760-2.html (Duxford Flying Legends 2005 videos)

  9. #9
    Senior Member Negative Creep's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    895
    Country
    United Kingdom
    If I remember rightly, didn't either the navigator or gunner one one of them have to hang out the aircraft and whack a faulty release mechanism loose? I love the story of the Swordfish, there is just something so British about it, how something that shouldn't have even been on the front line managed so much

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Louisville, KY
    Posts
    119
    Country
    United States
    WAY off topic, but something. A few years ago, we used to have a superb airshow locally, featuring a crapload of Mustangs, Fifi the B-29, a huge array of Texans, lots of other stuff, too, Jugs, Corsairs, you name it. When pulling into the parking lot, a finger four of Mustangs flew over, all those Merlins just purring like well-fed lions. That's about right, too, Chuck Yeager, Pete Petersen and two others from the 357thFG were in those Mustangs! Yowsers! I talked to them later, got Petersen to autograph his book for me.
    Then the airshow got some big corporate sponsor and it got all commercial, went to Hell, too.

  11. #11
    IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO FLYBOYJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Colorado, USA
    Posts
    20,533
    Country
    United States
    The US Navy in the later part of the war had an advantage - the proximity fuse.

    Crosley's Secret War Effort - The Proximity Fuze

  12. #12
    Senior Member trackend's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Canvey Island, Essex
    Posts
    4,040
    Country
    England
    Interesting little snippet Joe.
    I don't know how accurate the time fuses where (obviously nowhere near as good as PF's and not relevant to your post) anyone got any info on there accuracy.

    Quote Originally Posted by Negative Creep View Post
    If I remember rightly, didn't either the navigator or gunner one one of them have to hang out the aircraft and whack a faulty release mechanism loose? I love the story of the Swordfish, there is just something so British about it, how something that shouldn't have even been on the front line managed so much
    Ive never heard about that NC
    Read in The Swordfish story a couple of incidents One where an AA round passed between the Navigator and the Gunner and took out the floor. and another when the aircraft returned despite having a cylinder head shot off (good job it wasn't an inline)

  13. #13
    IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO FLYBOYJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Colorado, USA
    Posts
    20,533
    Country
    United States
    Quote Originally Posted by trackend View Post
    Interesting little snippet Joe.
    I don't know how accurate the time fuses where (obviously nowhere near as good as PF's and not relevant to your post) anyone got any info on there accuracy.
    I read that these fuses made a big difference in AA and were a well kept secret for many years.

  14. #14
    Senior Member trackend's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Canvey Island, Essex
    Posts
    4,040
    Country
    England
    Quote Originally Posted by FLYBOYJ View Post
    I read that these fuses made a big difference in AA and were a well kept secret for many years.
    I'm not surprised it was a secret FBJ very clever stuff. I've always thought the US ordnance was amongst the best (specially propellant technology) ,tho I suppose it would have only been a matter of time before a dud was studied by the enemy and its secrets learned.

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Louisville, KY
    Posts
    119
    Country
    United States
    Thanks for the links, trackend!

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181