Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums

The Ta-152.... The Best High Altitude Fighter?????

Aviation Discuss The Ta-152.... The Best High Altitude Fighter????? in the World War II - Aviation forums; my understanding is YES there were many test reports as III./JG 301 besides Bruno Stolles test Kommando which trained ...


Go Back   Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums > World War II - Aviation > Aviation

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 02-13-2007, 10:42 AM   #241
the old Sage
 
Erich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Platonic Sphere
Posts: 9,511
Country:
my understanding is YES there were many test reports as III./JG 301 besides Bruno Stolles test Kommando which trained III. gruppe pilots with of course minimal training - hop in take er for a spin. As to where the reports have fallen ? probably along with many important docs of 1945 in one of those 12 ton trucks vapourized near Berlin.
Erich is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2007, 07:20 AM   #242
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 43
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erich View Post
Leutnant Hagedorn (still alive and I have a signed bookplate via Weisenr from him), flew Yellow 2 on 2 February 45 while in III./JG 301 along with pilots Bübi Blum and Hauptman Benno Rühe. Hagedorn says they flew to 43,290 feet and flew at an incredible speed of 508-515 mph. "I'd never had such a fast aircraft under my behind in all my life".
That is a ground speed of 508-515mph. The speed was worked out with the help of Fw test pilot Kneemeier after the flight.
Morai_Milo is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2007, 07:27 AM   #243
Senior Member
 
Soren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,031
Ground speed equals TAS.
__________________

We have built a total of about 1250 of this aircraft (Me-262), but only fifty were allowed to be used as fighters - as interceptors. And out of this fifty, there were never more than 25 operational. So we had only a very, very few.
- Adolf Galland
Soren is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2007, 07:41 AM   #244
Senior Member
 
twoeagles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Now in PA!
Posts: 642
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soren View Post
Ground speed equals TAS.
....oops....those doggone headwinds....
twoeagles is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2007, 07:51 AM   #245
Senior Member
 
Soren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,031
In zero wind conditions ofcourse..

I doubt they were flying with the wind during all those speed runs.
__________________

We have built a total of about 1250 of this aircraft (Me-262), but only fifty were allowed to be used as fighters - as interceptors. And out of this fifty, there were never more than 25 operational. So we had only a very, very few.
- Adolf Galland
Soren is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2007, 06:28 PM   #246
Senior Member
 
davparlr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,218
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soren View Post
In zero wind conditions ofcourse..

I doubt they were flying with the wind during all those speed runs.
This is not a valid statement. Finding zero wind at high altitude is not a reasonable criteria for an aerodynamic test. Because of uncertainty of wind speed, TAS is generally calculated using atmospheric data not including wind.
davparlr is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2007, 06:38 PM   #247
Senior Member
 
davparlr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,218
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erich View Post
my understanding is YES there were many test reports as III./JG 301 besides Bruno Stolles test Kommando which trained III. gruppe pilots with of course minimal training - hop in take er for a spin. As to where the reports have fallen ? probably along with many important docs of 1945 in one of those 12 ton trucks vapourized near Berlin.
A loss for all of us.
davparlr is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2007, 07:38 AM   #248
Senior Member
 
Soren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,031
You're right Davparlr, hit myself on the head with that one
__________________

We have built a total of about 1250 of this aircraft (Me-262), but only fifty were allowed to be used as fighters - as interceptors. And out of this fifty, there were never more than 25 operational. So we had only a very, very few.
- Adolf Galland
Soren is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2007, 07:49 AM   #249
Senior Member
 
twoeagles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Now in PA!
Posts: 642
Country:
Gotta watch out for old Air Force and Navy Pilots!
twoeagles is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2007, 10:41 AM   #250
Senior Member
 
davparlr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,218
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soren View Post
You're right Davparlr, hit myself on the head with that one
We all hit ourselves on the head at times. Mine is pretty dinted!
davparlr is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2007, 12:05 AM   #251
Hairy one of Old Judea
 
kiwimac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Deepest Darkest NZ
Posts: 1,143
Country:
Send a message via ICQ to kiwimac Send a message via AIM to kiwimac Send a message via MSN to kiwimac Send a message via Yahoo to kiwimac Send a message via Skype™ to kiwimac
It is interesting to speculate what would have happened had the TA-152 been available earlier. They could have made life quite difficult for US Bomber crews.
__________________
kiwimac is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2007, 10:15 AM   #252
Senior Member
 
Lucky13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 7,393
Country:
Just for fun here fellow forum travellers... How would a Ta-152C get on in a Reno Air race?
__________________

JAN
"I´m going back to the front to relax"
"THE BLACK CATS FLIES TONIGHT"
"Find your enemy and shoot him down - everything else is unimportant!"
"When you're out of F-8's... You're out of fighters!"
Lucky13 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2007, 10:33 AM   #253
Senior Member
 
davparlr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,218
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucky13 View Post
Just for fun here fellow forum travellers... How would a Ta-152C get on in a Reno Air race?
The plane is pretty clean. Clean it up, and modify/replace the engine to generate 3000 hp (like all a the other racers) and it probably would do just fine.
davparlr is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2007, 10:51 PM   #254
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Queensland
Posts: 1,256
Country:
Would it have the manevourability to make it easy to get through the gates at that speed?
HealzDevo is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2007, 11:18 PM   #255
Senior Member
 
davparlr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,218
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by HealzDevo View Post
Would it have the manevourability to make it easy to get through the gates at that speed?
I think that aircraft line was noted for being quite maneuverable.
davparlr is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
   

AVIATION TOP 100 - www.avitop.com Avitop.com


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93