Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums

The Ta-152.... The Best High Altitude Fighter?????

Aviation Discuss The Ta-152.... The Best High Altitude Fighter????? in the World War II - Aviation forums; I can see your point there RG....


Go Back   Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums > World War II - Aviation > Aviation

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 03-09-2005, 03:50 PM   #76
Konfused with a 'K'
 
cheddar cheese's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Turin, Italy
Posts: 20,412
Country:
Send a message via AIM to cheddar cheese Send a message via MSN to cheddar cheese
I can see your point there RG.
__________________

with my one last gaping breath id apologise for bleeding on your shirt...
cheddar cheese is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2005, 07:08 AM   #77
Der Crewchief
 
DerAdlerIstGelandet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 30,276
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by RG_Lunatic
I disagree. When we start talking about "what if" the Luftwaffe had survived and been strong in the summer of 1945 and beyond, the P-80 is a legitimate plane for consideration.

=S=

Lunatic
If you put it that way yes you are correct and it should be considered then but what I mean is as a whole you do this.
__________________

US Army Blackhawk Crewchief 2000-2006

Classic ww2aircraft.net quotes:

fly boy said: "isn't that the first jet bomber? becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"

"wait what ok who made the b-2 crash come on people that messed up its a b-2"

"ah yes the mistel those things are so annoying is games and in real life"
DerAdlerIstGelandet is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2005, 09:37 AM   #78
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 795
Quote:
Originally Posted by RG_Lunatic
Actually, the sources I've seen indicate a 2000 lbs bomb, not "2000 lbs worth of bombs", indicating a single bomb on a center station.
Lots of room under the P-80's fuselage to mount this bomb. And it would have to be to the rear of the speed brake. Nice GC then.

KraziKanuK is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2005, 10:15 AM   #79
Der Crewchief
 
DerAdlerIstGelandet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 30,276
Country:
Nice pic.
__________________

US Army Blackhawk Crewchief 2000-2006

Classic ww2aircraft.net quotes:

fly boy said: "isn't that the first jet bomber? becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"

"wait what ok who made the b-2 crash come on people that messed up its a b-2"

"ah yes the mistel those things are so annoying is games and in real life"
DerAdlerIstGelandet is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2005, 04:58 PM   #80
Anonymous
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by DerAdlerIstGelandet
If you put it that way yes you are correct and it should be considered then but what I mean is as a whole you do this.
It depends on the context of the specific post I'm replying to. If we are talking about how things were the that is different than if we are talking about significant "what if's".

=S=

Lunatic
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2005, 12:46 PM   #81
Der Crewchief
 
DerAdlerIstGelandet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 30,276
Country:
Okay whatever man.
__________________

US Army Blackhawk Crewchief 2000-2006

Classic ww2aircraft.net quotes:

fly boy said: "isn't that the first jet bomber? becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"

"wait what ok who made the b-2 crash come on people that messed up its a b-2"

"ah yes the mistel those things are so annoying is games and in real life"
DerAdlerIstGelandet is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2005, 09:36 AM   #82
GT
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 527
Update.

Last edited by GT : 03-30-2006 at 07:01 AM.
GT is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2005, 09:45 AM   #83
Minister of Whoopass
 
lesofprimus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Long Island Native in Mississippi
Posts: 13,308
Country:
There were several....

You dont read many of the other topics and posts here do u??? There have been great discussions here concerning what ur asking. Maybe u should read some more of the Topics and posts that some of the more esteemed members here were kind enough to research and post for us.........
__________________


"After That Second Kill, I Knew It Was Time To Get The Hell Outta There..."--Lt. William Northrop Case

To See My IL2 Sturmovik Video Tribute to My Grandfather, Click Here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HtzN5RuNNJk
lesofprimus is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2005, 10:42 AM   #84
Senior Member
 
DAVIDICUS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 715
If the Ta-152 was pressed into wide service earlier, I suspect the Americans would have countered that threat with the XP-47J.


Image was taken in November of 1943.





From: http://home.att.net/~historyzone/Sev...Republic7.html

The J was fitted with a high output version of the P&W R-2800. Specifically, the R-2800-57. This engine made 2,800 hp @ 2,800 rpm at 35,000 feet. This is in War Emergency Power.

The aircraft actually attained 507 mph at an altitude of 34,300 feet. 2,800 hp is 133% of rated power. At military power (100%), the XP-47J could sustain 470 mph. 435 mph was attained at 81% of it's rated power (1,700 hp). All performance figures were obtained at 34,300 feet.

The J model was an especially good climbing fighter too. It had a climb rate at sea level of 4,900 fpm. At 20,000 feet, it was still rocketing up at 4,400 fpm, and got there in 4 minutes, 15 seconds. Time to 30,000 feet was only 6 minutes, 45 seconds. Now that's an interceptor! Yet it had a usable range of 1,075 miles. Rather impressive performance.

Nor was this a stripped down hotrod. It was fully armed and carried ballast in the wings equal to 267 rds per gun. The aircraft was flown to a height of 46,500 feet and was capable of a bit more.

Originally designed to defeat the FW-190 series fighters, the XP-47J certainly would have exceeded this requirement. In point of fact, with its critical Mach of .83, it had the potential to chase down Me-262's by utilizing a shallow dive, taking advantage of its superior service ceiling.
__________________
.
-=DAVIDICUS MAXIMUS=-
.
DAVIDICUS is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2005, 02:34 PM   #85
the old Sage
 
Erich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Platonic Sphere
Posts: 9,511
Country:
th Tank actually was destined to fly above 42,000 feet and using the glider mode drop down on P-51 escorts and then zoom up and flip over and repeat....
Erich is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2005, 05:29 PM   #86
Minister of Whoopass
 
lesofprimus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Long Island Native in Mississippi
Posts: 13,308
Country:
This is true... Loos actually got a few kills doing that same manouver...
__________________


"After That Second Kill, I Knew It Was Time To Get The Hell Outta There..."--Lt. William Northrop Case

To See My IL2 Sturmovik Video Tribute to My Grandfather, Click Here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HtzN5RuNNJk
lesofprimus is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2005, 09:13 PM   #87
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,260
Interesting phenomena...

...that superb German fighters which effectively saw service during the final days of the war are put into "doubt" due to the limited numbers reaching fighter units but unexplicably predict an alleged "superiority" of whatever of their designs which did not see any action during WWII.

Since the Ta 152 saw service and proved being a top machine I am more than convinced this allegedly superior plane -which did not see service- could be surpassed.

If we decide to play in the same pond, the Do 335, which did not see service, but got duly tested could also be a superior machine if compared to this particular USAAF fighter.
__________________
In a national survey, 92% of the French people believed they are not ugly: 93% of them were wrong.
Udet is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2005, 09:20 PM   #88
"Shooter"
 
evangilder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Moorpark, CA
Posts: 12,883
Country:
Send a message via Yahoo to evangilder
I have to agree in this case. We can only speculate how the XP-47J would have faired in aerial combat. The speed and climb rate are impressive, but that doesn't say how it would be in a dogfight. The Do-335 is said in some circles to have been the finest piston fighter of all time. It too was an impressive aircraft, but also untested in combat.
__________________


http://www.vg-photo.com

Wherever their bones may lie, the courage of heroes is consecrated in the hearts and engraved in the history of the free. Lt Col Honner DSO MC, 39th Commander speaking of the dead from the battle of Kokoda.
evangilder is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2005, 12:18 AM   #89
Senior Member
 
DAVIDICUS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 715
Gentlermen, before we all get our panties in a bunch, all I said was, "I suspect the Americans would have countered that threat with the XP-47J." I never said that the XP-47J would be superior.(I was thinking it however. )

We do know that the XP-47J was flying during the latter part of 1943 and was developed specifically to handle the Fw-190. How it would have actually fared in such combat had it gone into production we will obviously never know.

It should be borne in mind though that this was not an entirely untested and new combat design. It was essentially just a lighter and more aerodynamic P-47 Razorback with a 2,800hp "C" series turbo-supercharged engine within a close fitted cowling. I understand that it employed the same wings, tail, rudder and control surfaces.
__________________
.
-=DAVIDICUS MAXIMUS=-
.
DAVIDICUS is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2005, 01:05 AM   #90
"Shooter"
 
evangilder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Moorpark, CA
Posts: 12,883
Country:
Send a message via Yahoo to evangilder
Hey now, leave my panties out of this!
__________________


http://www.vg-photo.com

Wherever their bones may lie, the courage of heroes is consecrated in the hearts and engraved in the history of the free. Lt Col Honner DSO MC, 39th Commander speaking of the dead from the battle of Kokoda.
evangilder is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
   

AVIATION TOP 100 - www.avitop.com Avitop.com


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84