Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums

Ta 152H-1 vs P-51H

Aviation Discuss Ta 152H-1 vs P-51H in the World War II - Aviation forums; Ta 152H-1 vs P-51H Focke Wulf Ta 152H-1 Ta 152H-1 Statistics: Empty weight: 4,031 kg ...


Go Back   Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums > World War II - Aviation > Aviation

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack (1) Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 07-18-2006, 02:17 PM   1 links from elsewhere to this Post. Click to view. #1
Senior Member
 
Soren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,682
Ta 152H-1 vs P-51H

Ta 152H-1 vs P-51H

Focke Wulf Ta 152H-1


Ta 152H-1 Statistics:

Empty weight: 4,031 kg
Fully loaded weight: Escort Mission = 5,220 kg - Fighter Mission = 4,750 kg
Maximum loaded weight: 5,220 kg

Internal fuel capacity: 594 L B4 and 85 L GM-1 in the fuselage, 400 + 115 L B4 and 70 L MW-50 in the wings - Total = 1,109 L B4 + 85 L GM-1 + 70 L MW-50

Ta 152H-1 Dimensions:

Wing span: 14.44 m
Wing area: 23.3 m2
Lenght: 10.71 m
Height: 4 m

Ta 152H-1 Aerodynamics:

Wing loading: 224 - 203 kg/sq.m
Span loading: 361 - 328 kg/m
Wing aspect ratio: 8.94
Wing profile: Root = NACA FW 23015.3 or xxx20.6 - Tip = NACA FW 23009
Wing thickness ratio: Root 15.3% - 20.6% - Tip = 9%

Power loading: 2.54 - 2.31 kg/hp

Ta 152H-1 Performance:

Max speeds:

- 598 km/h at sea level using MW-50
- 749 km/h at 9,500 m using MW-50
- 760 km/h at 12,500 m using GM-1 (MAX)

Note: These speeds were superceded in combat as engine performance apparently was better with the Ta152H's in service compared to the test-bed(s).

Climb rates and time:

- 20m/s at Start u. Notlesitung = 1,730 HP @ 3,250 RPM
- ~26m/s at Sonder Notleistung = 2,050 HP @ 3,250 RPM

- 10.1 min to climb 10,000 m using MW-50

Service ceiling: 14,800 - 15,100m

Jumo 213E performance:

- 1,580 HP @ 3,000 RPM = Steig u. Kampfleistung
- 1,730 HP @ 3,250 RPM = Start u. Notleistung
- 2,050 HP @ 3,250 RPM = Sonder Notleistung


Ta 152H-1 Armament:

1x 30mm MK108 cannon and 2x 20mm MG151/20 cannons

Ta 152H-1 Service record::

Service entering date: 27th January 1945
Losses to aerial combat: 0
Losses to accidents: 3 (two of them occured in combat)
Confirmed kills in aerial combat: 11


North American P-51H Mustang


P-51H Statistics:

Empty weight: 3,193 kg
Loaded weight: Escort Mission = 5,216 kg - Fighter Mission = 4,310 kg
Maximum loaded weight: 5,216 kg

Internal fuel capacity: 965 L of 100/150 grade fuel.

P-51H Dimension:

Wing span: 11.27 m
Wing area: 21.64 m2
Length: 10.15 m
Height: 4.16 m

P-51H Aerodynamics:

Wing loading: 241 - 199.1 kg/sq.m
Span loading: 462 - 382.4 kg/m
Wing aspect ratio: 5.86
Wing profile: Root = NACA 66-(1.8 )15.5 – Tip = NACA 66-(1.8 )12 “Laminar”
Wing thickness ratio: Root = 15.5% - Tip = 12%

Power-loading: 2.35 – 1.94 kg/hp

P-51H Performance:

Max speeds:

- 714 km/h at 1,524 m using (W)WEP
- 745 km/h at 4,570 m using (W)WEP
- 783 km/h at 7,620 m using (W)WEP (MAX)

Climb rates and time:

- ~24-25 m/s at sea level using (W)WEP

- 1.5 min to climb 1,524 m using (W)WEP
- 5 min to climb 4,570 m using (W)WEP

Service ceiling: 12,679 m

Packard V-1650-9 performance:

- 1,380 HP @ 3,000 RPM = Take Off Power
- 1,720 HP @ 3,000 RPM = War Emergency Power
- 2,218 HP @ 3,000 RPM = Wet War Emergency Power


P-51H Armament:

6x 12.7mm machine-guns.

P-51H Service record:

Non WWII aircraft.

_________________________________________________

Aerodynamic Facts:

Airfoil Thickness Ratio - Higher is better.
Wing Aspect Ratio - Higher is better.
Span-loading - Lower is better.
Power-loading - Lower is better.

Laminar wing info:
Laminar flow wings lowered the drag, but this came at the cost of lower lift, especially under high G loads. A Laminar flow wing will stall earlier and more violently than a conventional wing.

Wing aspect ratio info:
There is a component of the drag of an aircraft called induced drag which depends inversely on the aspect ratio. A higher aspect ratio wing has a lower drag and a higher lift than a lower aspect ratio wing.

Span loading info:
The turning drag/lift factor is proportional to the span loading (W/b^2) at a given G loading and indicated airspeed (IAS). It is related to induced drag and is familiar to aerodynamicists. It is the dominant parameter in calculating sustained G. In air-combat turns, the induced drag at a given G level is directly proportional to the span loading.
__________________

We have built a total of about 1250 of this aircraft (Me-262), but only fifty were allowed to be used as fighters - as interceptors. And out of this fifty, there were never more than 25 operational. So we had only a very, very few.
- Adolf Galland

Last edited by Soren : 07-18-2006 at 04:29 PM.
Soren is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Old 07-18-2006, 02:30 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Redwood City
Posts: 223
it's all over

Last edited by Sal Monella : 08-06-2006 at 12:31 AM.
Sal Monella is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Old 07-18-2006, 02:37 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Soren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,682
Well its 5 min to 15,000 ft according to my sources. Have you got any other figures ?
__________________

We have built a total of about 1250 of this aircraft (Me-262), but only fifty were allowed to be used as fighters - as interceptors. And out of this fifty, there were never more than 25 operational. So we had only a very, very few.
- Adolf Galland
Soren is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Old 07-18-2006, 02:48 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Redwood City
Posts: 223
all over

Last edited by Sal Monella : 08-06-2006 at 12:31 AM.
Sal Monella is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Old 07-18-2006, 02:55 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Redwood City
Posts: 223
no more

Last edited by Sal Monella : 08-06-2006 at 12:31 AM.
Sal Monella is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Old 07-18-2006, 03:05 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
Soren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,682
Yes, well what I've got is 5 min to 15,000 ft and 6.8 min to 20,000 ft. This might be at combat power however... I'll update the comparison as soon as I get the right figures.
__________________

We have built a total of about 1250 of this aircraft (Me-262), but only fifty were allowed to be used as fighters - as interceptors. And out of this fifty, there were never more than 25 operational. So we had only a very, very few.
- Adolf Galland
Soren is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Old 07-18-2006, 03:13 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
Soren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,682
Just checked in some charts, and its most likely at "dry" WEP. I'll see if I can get the "Wet" WEP figures.
__________________

We have built a total of about 1250 of this aircraft (Me-262), but only fifty were allowed to be used as fighters - as interceptors. And out of this fifty, there were never more than 25 operational. So we had only a very, very few.
- Adolf Galland
Soren is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Old 07-18-2006, 03:39 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Redwood City
Posts: 223
it's over

Last edited by Sal Monella : 08-06-2006 at 12:32 AM.
Sal Monella is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Old 07-18-2006, 03:48 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
Soren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,682
Water methanol injection
__________________

We have built a total of about 1250 of this aircraft (Me-262), but only fifty were allowed to be used as fighters - as interceptors. And out of this fifty, there were never more than 25 operational. So we had only a very, very few.
- Adolf Galland
Soren is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Old 07-18-2006, 03:51 PM   #10
the old Sage
 
Erich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Platonic Sphere
Posts: 8,565
Country:
ice cube liquid-injection my friend ........a nice 10/15 minute burst of excitement, actually longer in the Ta 152H-1. Heres something to ponder if Monogram ever gets it published ....

FOCKE-WULF Ta 152
Monarch-4
By Thomas H. Hitchcock
ISBN: 987-0-914144-55-4
Size: 9 x 12 inch (229 x 305 mm)
200 printed pages
Binding: Case bound hardcover
American retail price: $55.95

Contents: Introduction, Foreword, Chapters 1 – 5, Epilogue, Appendices: 1) Camouflage, Insignia and Markings; 2) Production and Werknummem; 3) Technical Description, Specifiications, Performance Equipment; 4) Pilot Operating Instructions, Bibliography, Index

155 Photographs; 31 in full color.
79 Drawing plates (3-views, sectionals, charts, detail views, general arrangement dwgs, plus maps.)
26 full color illustrations
__________________
shhhh ........ es ist ein Geheimnis
Erich is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Old 07-18-2006, 04:36 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
Soren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,682
If the P-51H ran at (W)WEP for any longer than 5-7 min its engine would be trashed.

I really hope it gets published Erich, currently I have Dietmar Harmann's book on the Ta 152, a great book.
__________________

We have built a total of about 1250 of this aircraft (Me-262), but only fifty were allowed to be used as fighters - as interceptors. And out of this fifty, there were never more than 25 operational. So we had only a very, very few.
- Adolf Galland
Soren is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Old 07-18-2006, 04:46 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Redwood City
Posts: 223
edit

Last edited by Sal Monella : 08-06-2006 at 12:32 AM.
Sal Monella is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Old 07-18-2006, 04:48 PM   #13
Senior Member
 
Soren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,682
What about it ?
__________________

We have built a total of about 1250 of this aircraft (Me-262), but only fifty were allowed to be used as fighters - as interceptors. And out of this fifty, there were never more than 25 operational. So we had only a very, very few.
- Adolf Galland
Soren is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Old 07-18-2006, 04:59 PM   #14
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Redwood City
Posts: 223
it's over

Last edited by Sal Monella : 08-06-2006 at 12:32 AM.
Sal Monella is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Old 07-18-2006, 06:00 PM   #15
Senior Member
 
Soren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,682
Well just so know its only running at WEP, what we need is info on its performance at (W)WEP which was quite abit higher.
__________________

We have built a total of about 1250 of this aircraft (Me-262), but only fifty were allowed to be used as fighters - as interceptors. And out of this fifty, there were never more than 25 operational. So we had only a very, very few.
- Adolf Galland
Soren is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Closed Thread



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.ww2aircraft.net/forum/aviation/ta-152h-1-vs-p-51h-4570.html
Posted By For Type Date
Question - FW190D wing profile questions - RC Groups This thread Refback 10-25-2006 09:10 AM

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Ta-152.... The Best High Altitude Fighter????? lesofprimus Aviation 502 08-06-2007 04:09 PM
The Best Fw-190 Variant...? cheddar cheese Aviation 426 05-13-2007 01:38 PM
Flying the Ta 152H Erich Stories 26 08-09-2006 05:02 PM
Ta152-H1 uber-fighter? Anonymous Aviation 235 06-23-2005 04:34 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
   

AVIATION TOP 100 - www.avitop.com Avitop.com


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82