![]() |
| |||||||
| Aviation Discussion on the aircraft of WWII. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #226 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 780
| Quote:
The much heavier P-38 also carried a much heavier armament and achieved it's performance, in part because of it's turbos, it's over 400mph speed were achieved over 20,000ft for the most part but some later models were still good for 400mph at 35,000ft. Please note that the 395mph speed of the FW 187 was achieved using a "surface evaporative cooling system" which, while used by many race planes going back to the 20's was never used on service combat planes for good reason. I actually like the FW 187 and wonder what it could have done with uprated JUMO 210s but turning it into a 400mph, heavily armed fighter might be more difficult than it first appears. | |
| | |
| | #227 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 780
| Try the He 111B, D, J, and P models. granted they were made in small numbers but it was at the 1937-39 time frame when development of the FW 187 was going on and production decisions had to be made. About 100 Do 215 bomber/recon aircraft also used the DB 601. And, of course, the Bf 110 versions used as fast bombers which would have been a bit more difficult with the smaller FW 187 airframe. THe Me 210-410 series did have a bomb bay so what are they really? Quote:
How many of these JU 88s were powered by BMW 801s which you have canceled? All these plans would have to start being put into place in 1938-39 | |
| | |
| | #228 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 913
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #229 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 913
| About 100 Do 215 bomber The Do-215 was produced in limited quantities for export. It has nothing to do with aircraft mass produced for the Luftwaffe. |
| | |
| | #230 |
| IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO ![]() Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 16,861
| No, I'm saying the 187 and by 1943 the -109 were a waste of time and resources. I'd be pumping out Ta-152s, Me-262s like there was no tomorrow.
__________________ > I Support Doug Gillis < |
| | |
| | #231 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 780
| Quote:
Now two did go to Russia and in 1942 4 were transferred to the Hungarian air Force but that does leave 99-95 that saw service with the Luftwaffe. Maybe not mass produced but certainly used in larger numbers than many other types of German aircraft that get a lot more press. | |
| | |
| | #232 |
| Senior Member | I'm with Davebender on this one. I can understand why the Fw 187 wasn't chosen for production back in the late 30s as the Bf 110 was considered to be sufficient and already in production. But if the Fw 187 had been chosen it would have given the Germans a massive advantage. What was the Fw 190 about? Basically a fighter with a radial engine. That's the reason of its existence. I have read Flyboyj saying the Fw 190 was better than the Bf 109. Yet the figures and performance reports do not support this. And the personal accounts of Luftwaffe pilots show conflicting information. Some preferred the Fw 190 some the Bf 109. But all in all, one can conclude that both were rather similar in air combat performance. So sure it makes sense to bet on both a radial as an inline engine just like the Americans and Russians did. But there is also an answer for that: the Bf 109X which showed good performance. One can produce both versions simultaneously with hardly any extra costs. Let's be honest about this? What was the real value of the Fw 190? What could it do what a Bf 109 couldn't? I can come up with one: high-speed ground attacks. And this was a secondary task which the Fw 187 could also perform. Now, what I really want to add to this debate is the following. When Kurt Tank was given the order to develop a high altitude fighter he didn't start with the Ta 152H right away. His first thought was to take up the Fw 187 as he believed it would have taken a twin-engined fighter to get the perfornances needed. So back in 1943 Kurt Tank still thought the Fw 187 as a viable alternative. I know we shouldn't get carried away by the Fw 187. It may have been fast and quite manoeuvrable but what would it have been like when fitted with Db 601s or even 605s ?? Some people put it in the 700+ kmh section but I don't know about that. On the other hand, with two DB 605s we are actually seeing TWICE the engine power of the one with two Jumo 210s. Given the Fw 187 better armament and armour I still see it way above 650 kmh. It was tested with two DB 600s which means it could easily take two DB 601s and probably two DB 605s. The DB 603 would be too much though! What we got then is an aircraft with unprecedented climb rate and possibly the fastest fighter aircraft until the arrival of the P-47 in 1943. But until 1944 it would be a heavy fighter which would be the main bomber interceptor and the main medium range reconaissance aircraft and also an important fighter bomber and night fighter. It would have been too small to house all the electronics but until the arrival of the Lichtenstein equipment it would have been an excellent night fighter. By saving BMW 801s enough Ju 88R/Gs could be built. But yes, a new dedicated night fighter would be needed after 1942. But as Tank till looked at the Fw 197 as late as 1943 it seems that the design was still viable until 1944/1945. Or until the arrival of the Me 262 Kris
__________________ ![]() Last edited by Civettone; 11-06-2009 at 01:01 AM. |
| | |
| | #233 | |||
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 192
| More like one fighter + one heavy fighter. What if you run into development problems with the 109 (what actually kind of happened). Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
| |||
| | |
| | #234 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: London
Posts: 3,911
| Quote:
Then churn them out as quickly as possible. The Me109 was past its best and the FW187 was a) unknown. b) needed development and c) didn't have the performance edge to dominate the sky. | |
| | |
| | #235 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 875
| Quote:
__________________ | |
| | |
| | #236 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 875
| Quote:
__________________ | |
| | |
| | #237 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 913
| Quote:
I am suggesting the Fw-187 as an alternative path if we can go back to January 1940. | |
| | |
| | #238 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 780
| The YP-38 was about 3,000lbs heavier not 4,000lbs. that is empty weight. It is quite likely that niether plane had armor or self sealing tanks. Changing from Jumo 210s to DB 601s is going to add around 280lbs per engine, dry weight. It could easily be another 100lbs per propellor and so on for the cowlings, engine oil, radiators and so on. does it equel 3000lbs? No but then we haven't doubled the engine power either. Just gone from 700hp to 1150hp. and at altitudes under 20,000ft. The P-38 (early versions) could keep making 1150hp all the way to 25,000ft. Later versions could make 1100hp at 32500-34000ft at 2600rpm (high speed cruise). of course it took the heavy, bulky turbo-charger system to do it. What altitude did you want the FW 187 to fight at? "Since I was never fond to evaporative cooling, the up-engined FW-187 would've used regular one." Yep, but since they used that system to get less drag (more speed) it means that the plane with a regular system is slower. And then we get to the CG and load factor problems. Most of the weight is in front of the CG which requires shifting items of equipment and/or ballast and/or a rear fuselage stretch to balance things out. Not impossiable but not done at zero cost to performance. Did the FW 187 V6 have any guns or did the lack of armament help the CG issue? Load factor. what was the load factor of the original design? just for illistrations sake let's say the FW 187 had a load factor of 7 'G's. at 11,000lbs. Now if we up the weight to 12,000lbs the load factor drops to about 6.4 'G's and at 13,000lbs it drops to 5.92 'G's. Now maybe the FW 187 had a reserve of strength and doesn't need any beefed up structure and maybe there is no reserve of strength. By the way, The P-38 carried 992lbs worth of guns and ammo. Heavy armament usually means heavy airplanes. |
| | |
| | #239 | |
| IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO ![]() Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 16,861
| Quote:
Actually it was around in 1944 and "could have" been available a lot sooner.
__________________ > I Support Doug Gillis < | |
| | |
| | #240 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 913
| What altitude did you want the FW 187 to fight at? The original 1940 version would be primarily a bomber escort. Therefore it will operate at the same height as He-111s and Ju-88s. Around 1943 a bomber killer version would appear. This would have engines rated for high altitude and 4 nose mounted cannon. |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |