|
| |||||||
| Aviation Discussion on the aircraft of WWII. |
| View Poll Results: Top Heavy Bomber | |||
| Heinkel He 177 Greif |     | 0 | 0% |
| Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress |    | 7 | 11.11% |
| Consolidated B-24 Liberator |    | 0 | 0% |
| Boeing B-29 Superfortress |    | 37 | 58.73% |
| Convair B-32 Dominator |    | 1 | 1.59% |
| Armstrong Whitworth Whitley |    | 1 | 1.59% |
| Avro Lancaster | | 16 | 25.40% |
| Handley Page Halifax | | 0 | 0% |
| Short Stirling | | 1 | 1.59% |
| Ilyushin DB-3 | | 0 | 0% |
| Ilyushin Il-4 | | 0 | 0% |
| Petlyakov Pe-8 | | 0 | 0% |
| Voters: 63. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
11-16-2007, 09:30 AM
| #1 |
| Der Crewchief   Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 33,152
| Top Heavy Bomber This is similiar to the Top Medium Bomber thread but for Heavies instead. Remember top does not necessarily mean best for me. Then again in my opinion the Top is the Best and that is the B-29. To clear things up as well I classified heavy bombers as those that had a payload of 5500lb+.
__________________  fly boy:"isnt that the first jet bomber becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"[/I] Last edited by DerAdlerIstGelandet; 11-16-2007 at 09:52 AM. |
|         |
|
11-16-2007, 09:53 AM
| #2 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,765
| Hi Adler, Top Heavy Bomber - hm, I thought for a moment this was a thread about capsizing aircraft :-) Regards, Henning (HoHun) |
|
| |
|
11-16-2007, 10:07 AM
| #3 | |
| Der Crewchief Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 33,152
| Quote:
__________________ fly boy:"isnt that the first jet bomber becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"[/I] | |
|
| |
|
11-16-2007, 10:32 AM
| #4 |
| "World Traveller"   Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Royal Deeside/St Andrews, Scotland, UK
Posts: 15,224
  | B-29 hands down.
__________________  "Success is not Final, Failure is not Fatal, it is the Courage to Continue that Counts" Sir Winston Churchill "To him the People of the World Largely owe the Freedom and Liberties they Enjoy Today" Enscription on Hugh Dowding's (AOC Fighter Command 1936-40) statue in London WW2 Talk: A WW2 Discussion Forum My Photo Collections on Flickr |
|
| |
|
11-16-2007, 12:35 PM
| #5 |
| Senior Member  Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 10,283
| Who voted for the Lanc?
__________________ "Pilot to copilot..... what are those mountain goats doing up here in the clouds?" |
|
| |
|
11-16-2007, 01:17 PM
| #6 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Aquincum, Pannonia Prima
Posts: 784
| The B-29 is an obvious hands-down winner here, and it`s kinda a, unfair, given it`s size was about twice the others (not to mention the B-32..) b, makes the question redundant, since with the 29/32 on the list, there`s really any other answer... IMHO it would be better to narrow it down to the 'classic' ~30 ton take off weight heavy bomber class.
__________________ __________________________________________________  http://kurfurst.org http://kurfurst.freeforums.org/index.php |
|
| |
|
11-16-2007, 01:33 PM
| #7 | |
| Senior Member  Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: oregon
Posts: 3,944
| Quote:
My favorite will always be the B-17 for the war it fought over Germany The most intriguing for me is the He 177. What if - the dive bombing role and the two nacelle/four engine design had not been part of the spec? What if - it had been designed for USAAF instead? | |
|
| |
|
11-16-2007, 01:42 PM
| #8 |
| Senior Member  Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Jersey Shore
Posts: 3,233
| Agree with drgondog... No contest, B-29 the best....by far  And my favorite (and most beautiful) is the "Flying Fortress". TO
__________________  “Let's get Enterprise and Hornet turned into the wind." |
|
| |
|
11-16-2007, 05:32 PM
| #9 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,765
| Hi Adler, Here is a good article on the B-29, written by John Deakin who is one of the pilots of the CAF's "Fifi": Pelican's Perch #56: Superfortress! "The word "awesome" is badly overused, but I cannot help but use it to describe the airplane, and the experience of flying it. It is not that is such a good airplane (it's not), or that it flies well (it doesn't), but the history! This is the WWII "Very Heavy Bomber," the largest airplane used in WWII, and the one that did such yeoman service in the Pacific." And a supplement by Randy Sohn who rescued "Fifi" from the boneyard: Pelican's Perch #56 Supplement: Randy Sohn on the B-29 "Queen of the fleet? Undeniably! But this last of the completely muscle powered manually controlled aircraft could never be accused of easy handling flight control qualities." John actually posted a - possibly shorter - version of that article on Compuserve's AVSIG forum long ago, and after reading his comments on the control forces, I quoted the B-29 manual to him: "The flight controls are conventional and the forces necessary to move them are light, even at high flying speeds - a surprising fact to most pilots the first time they fly the B-29." I don't remember his precise answer, but I think it was something about the manual obviously having been written by Boeing's marketing department  Regards, Henning (HoHun) |
|
| |
|
11-16-2007, 06:35 PM
| #10 |
| Senior Member  Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Queensland
Posts: 4,543
| B-29 hands down, though the B-24 and Lanc are my favourites..
__________________  |
|
| |
|
11-16-2007, 07:26 PM
| #11 |
| Senior Member  Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 268
| As I understand the B-29 still stands alone. It was way too advanced both in the idea and technically. Simple catalogue-data comparisons of the B-29 with the rest of the types would not mean much. If a timeline set, say, at the end of 1943, comparisons can be made between such types include; Lanc, Halifax, Stirling, B-24, B-17. But still, it is difficult to compare each types due to the differences in idea, purpose, role and the results. Each had own meanings and reasons. Therefore I would choose the Lancaster as MY best bomber because it looks good and right. The second is the B-17 also because it looks very nice and I put the B-29 onto a spetial place in the history of the whole aviation.
__________________ Guy Gibson; "Hello P-popsie. Are you all right?" "I think so leader... |
|
| |
|
11-16-2007, 07:38 PM
| #12 | |
| Senior Member  Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: FL
Posts: 3,294
| Quote:
I got lanc on the brain I just saw one in a museum. Although the lanc get huge points for versatility... (tall boys, grand slam and dam buster) | |
|
| |
|
11-16-2007, 08:26 PM
| #13 |
| Junior Member  Join Date: May 2007 Location: Alabama
Posts: 18
| nah the b-17 made more missions than the b-29 did and when the b-29 finally came into service, Japan and Germany were both losing the war badly. The b-17 is always more commedoring than the b-29
__________________ ***HONOR THE FALLEN*** USS Lexington USS Yorktown USS Langley USS Wasp USS Hornet  ***HONOR THE GREAT*** P-51 Yamato class B-17 Cleveland class Bf-109 Fletcher class F6F Hellcat Myoko class  |
|
| |
|
11-16-2007, 08:56 PM
| #14 | |
| Senior Member  Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Jacksonville, NC
Posts: 3,562
| Quote:
__________________ If the Army and the Navy ever look on heaven's scenes, they will find the streets are guarded by United States Marines  | |
|
| |
|
11-17-2007, 05:11 AM
| #15 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 10
| Surely the Lanc has to be the best as I think it did more missions that the Superfort |
|
| |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Linear Mode
