Quote:
Originally Posted by Glider Have to agree with this. I would rate the Do217 over the B25/B26.
The A26 I am not sure of. It had the speed certainly but I am not sure about the remote controlled guns. They were aimed using a periscope arrangement, a set up that was fraught with difficulty. What you see is a narrow arc of vision and this must make it difficult to see the incoming fighter and almost impossible to do a visual search for danger |
Glider - to me this is one of those interesting comparisons that force you to consider mission closely. On paper the Do 217 was a better pure medium bomber than the B-25 for either daylight or night based on speed altitude and payload.
On the otherhand, the LW tactical doctrine, because it had no capability to escort it to any reasonable range, could not fully exploit those capabilities.
There is no question in my mind that it could be configured to a low level attack aircraft with at least the same firepower capability as a B-25 but to do so probably takes the bomb load and range below a B-25..
On the other hand if you strip the B-25 forward firing armament, the waist gunners, etc to configure close to the Do 217 you will have more range than the D0217 and about the same ordnance capability as a pure medium bomber.
The A-26 was all about forward firepower and bomb load/rocket capability. Reduce the forward firing .50s to say the 4 cheek guns and keep the turret/gunner and you lose 2,000 pounds of weight that really increase the speed and range way beyond the Do 217... in fact you are moving it into Mossie speed range at 20,000 feet and perhaps faster on the deck.