![]() |
| |||||||
| Aviation Discussion on the aircraft of WWII. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 651
| Unorthodox Blohm und Voss Aircraft So I was just checking out the Luft '46 page on Blohm und Voss prototypes. Check it out at Blohm & Voss Company Luft '46 Page Now maybe I'm just not that smart, but I don't see why you would use an asymetric layout for an aircraft instead of using a pusher propeller. Especially the designs with a prop on one side and a jet on the other. Give me some feed pack. |
| | |
| | #2 |
| "Shooter" ![]() | There were a few of the asymmetrical designs that actually flew quite well.
__________________ ![]() http://www.vg-photo.com For once you have tasted flight you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skywards, for there you have been and there you will long to return. Leonardo Da Vinci |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 651
| Then why would you design an aircraft like that. What is the advantage? |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 2,412
| Having a single engined a/c without the prop and engine limiting the view and armament of the cockpit/central nacelle/fusalage. |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 651
| but wouldn't it be better to just use a pusher propeller? |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 2,412
| Maybe but that has problems too. Most importantly the ability of a pilot to bail out with the prop behinh him. (the usual fix was to make the prop jetisinable) In WWI (a bit off topic) though this wouldn't have mettered as the pilot wasn't going to be bailing out (no parachute) and would have "engine armor" behind him, albeit none for head-on attacks. (which were less likely aniway) This was done to facilitae nose armaments without syncronisation or high wing mountings. Last edited by kool kitty89; 03-23-2008 at 06:00 PM. |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 651
| Alright got it! |
| | |
| | #8 |
| The Pop-Tart Whisperer ![]() Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: South Jersey, United States
Posts: 10,237
| BV 141 actually got very good marks from the test pilots that flew it and probably encouraged B&V to explore further. I believe it was designed as a recon plane with a very good view.
__________________ ![]() "If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it's English, thank a soldier!" http://www.njcacoa.org/ |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 2,412
| iirc it was a competetor of the Fw 189 for that role. And the 189 had amazing visibility too. albeit with little protection, though decent armament and excelent evasive abilities. |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Bucharest
Posts: 907
| Interesting designs...B & V had some pretty exotic models.
__________________ These airplanes we have today are no more than a perfection of a child's toy made of paper."Henri Coanda" |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Central Texas
Posts: 250
| Interesting little site about asymmetric aircraft: ASYMMETRIC AIRCRAFT Also, do a google search using the words "asymmetric aircraft" and you'll get some interesting results |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |