Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums

USAF fighter test

Aviation Discuss USAF fighter test in the World War II - Aviation forums; Old magz test of Hellcat, earlyish Corsair, Mustang, and P-47. Interesting stuff....


Go Back   Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums > World War II - Aviation > Aviation

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 01-06-2007, 07:09 AM   #1
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 215
USAF fighter test

Old magz test of Hellcat, earlyish Corsair, Mustang, and P-47.

Interesting stuff.

Last edited by Chingachgook : 01-30-2007 at 07:25 AM.
Chingachgook is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2007, 07:24 AM   #2
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 215
the rest...

Last edited by Chingachgook : 01-30-2007 at 07:25 AM.
Chingachgook is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2007, 09:46 AM   #3
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 35
Country:
Very interesting, thx for posting
Brain32 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2007, 10:28 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
davparlr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,024
Country:
Was there more?
davparlr is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2007, 01:38 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Matt308's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Washington State
Posts: 8,476
Country:
Excellent read! Thanks!

The Roll Performance test really suprised me.
__________________

"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if
they made a difference in the world. But, the [U.S.]
Marines don't have that problem."
-- Ronald Reagan

Master of Duplicate Posts
Matt308 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2007, 02:08 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
Jank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 681
"The R-2800 engines in the test aircraft ... all rated at approximately 2,000BHP."

That's fine for the Corsair and Hellcat but way underpower for the R-2800-59 on the D-40 Thunderbolt which developed 2,535hp.

Last edited by Jank : 01-06-2007 at 06:28 PM.
Jank is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2007, 08:33 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
davparlr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,024
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jank View Post
"The R-2800 engines in the test aircraft ... all rated at approximately 2,000BHP."

That's fine for the Corsair and Hellcat but way underpower for the R-2800-59 on the D-40 Thunderbolt which developed 2,535hp.
My info shows that the FG-1D generated 2250 hp.
davparlr is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2007, 08:56 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
Jank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 681
I suppose you might get away with "at approximately 2,000 BHP" when it's 2,250 (it's really stretching it though) but not when it's 2,535.

Last edited by Jank : 01-06-2007 at 09:11 PM.
Jank is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2007, 09:46 PM   #9
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 215
Quote:
Originally Posted by davparlr View Post
Was there more?
No, that was it.

They all seem a bit detuned for civilian life (?).
Chingachgook is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2007, 01:17 AM   #10
Senior Member
 
Jank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 681
Yes, but removing a Thunderbolt's turbo-supercharger is like cutting the balls off of a Grizzly.
Jank is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2007, 10:15 AM   #11
Senior Member
 
davparlr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,024
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chingachgook View Post
No, that was it.

They all seem a bit detuned for civilian life (?).
Thanks. It must have been my slow modem. I got it all the next time I opened.
davparlr is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2007, 10:19 AM   #12
Senior Member
 
davparlr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,024
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jank View Post
Yes, but removing a Thunderbolt's turbo-supercharger is like cutting the balls off of a Grizzly.
Yes, and testing at low altitude for the P-47 and P-51 is playing in someone else's playground. Still, it was an interesting comparison.
davparlr is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2007, 12:15 PM   #13
Senior Member
 
Matt308's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Washington State
Posts: 8,476
Country:
The test was somewhat inconclusive and they knew it. They even admit the test was rather "tongue in cheek".

Good read nonetheless.
__________________

"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if
they made a difference in the world. But, the [U.S.]
Marines don't have that problem."
-- Ronald Reagan

Master of Duplicate Posts
Matt308 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2007, 01:36 PM   #14
Senior Member
 
Jank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 681
Indeed.

One thing that surprised me was the cramped cockpit of the P-47. Evaluations of these same aircraft in the Joint Fighter Conference indicated that the cockpit was quite spacious, thereby helping to alleviate the problems associated with long missions.

Last edited by Jank : 01-07-2007 at 02:19 PM.
Jank is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2007, 07:45 PM   #15
Senior Member
 
Matt308's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Washington State
Posts: 8,476
Country:
And the comments on the extremely uncomfortable seat! How could that be overlooked on an airplane that was designed from the outset for escort duties.

AND served in the PTO where long distances were common. Didn't someone address that? I kinda find that hard to believe that the seat was only comfortable for the 30th percentile and offered virtually no thigh support. Christ that must have been 'crampingly' uncomfortable.
__________________

"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if
they made a difference in the world. But, the [U.S.]
Marines don't have that problem."
-- Ronald Reagan

Master of Duplicate Posts
Matt308 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
   

AVIATION TOP 100 - www.avitop.com Avitop.com


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82