ADS NOT DISPLAYED TO REGISTERED USERS.
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 24
Like Tree1Likes

what if FW190 had been available at the start of the war

Aviation Discuss what if FW190 had been available at the start of the war in the World War II - Aviation forums; please forgive me if this has been done before but what if the FW190 had been available during the start ...

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    maidenhead uk
    Posts
    1,322
    Country
    United Kingdom
    Blog Entries
    1

    what if FW190 had been available at the start of the war

    please forgive me if this has been done before but what if the FW190 had been available during the start of the war and the Axis forces employed the same tactics as the british{ie faster types against fighters-spitfire/slower type against bombers-hurricane],using these tactics using the 109e and fw190a what would that change and how would you counter this,i don't have any info myself but i know a lot of you are really clued up,what do you think chaps


  2. #2
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    4
    Country
    England
    boB wise, I would imagine a sensible use of them (Assuming here that most are 109's with some 190's, kind of like the Spit/Hurri ratio in the BoB) would have been to fly the 190s high above bomber formations and intercept the interceptors. Luckily Nazis are not overly sensible people so they probably would have had them doing low level bombing runs

    Certainly, RAF losses would have been very high as the 190 was very much a better fighter than the Mk1 Spitfire, let alone the Hurricane. That said, what was the combat radius of the 190? Was it appreciably better than the 109? Thats the critical things so far as the BoB is concerned.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    maidenhead uk
    Posts
    1,322
    Country
    United Kingdom
    Blog Entries
    1
    as the FW190 1st flew in 1939,if it had been 1st flown in say 1938 some would have been available in time and as you suggest maybe in the numbers available of the spitfire's at the b.o.b,how long would a 190 have over the target area to mop up the RAF fighters

  4. #4
    Senior Member DonL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Niedersachsen
    Posts
    658
    Country
    Germany
    Yes the combat Radius of the FW 190A-1 was better then the Bf 109 E3.

    The FW 190A had 525 Liter fuel compare 400 Liter of the Bf 109! So I think the FW 190 had 10-15 minutes more time over South England.

  5. #5
    Creator of Interesting Threads tomo pauk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    4,582
    Country
    Croatia
    Since Fw-190 was regularly equipped with drop tank, the real difference in time over England would be because of that feature - the 190 was much heavier, with an engine of greater fuel consumption.

    Of course, the Spitfire IX would've messed the results of our experiment

  6. #6
    Senior Member davebender's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Michigan, USA
    Posts
    5,380
    Country
    United States

    FW190 had been available during the start of the war

    Possible but it won't be powered by a BMW801 engine.

    Point of Departure.
    1937. RLM kisses and makes up with Daimler-Benz management. Consequently Daimler-Benz engine programs will be fully funded.
    .....Genshagen DB601 engine plant receives 50 million RM funding as originally planned rather then being scaled back to 20 million RM.
    .....DB603 engine development and production will be fully funded.

    Dr. Tank preferred Daimler-Benz engines and that's what will power his new fighter aircraft. One of his 1937 fighter aircraft proposals was powered by a DB601 engine. It's the only single engine Focke Wulf fighter which can be in mass production during 1940 so for the sake of this scenerio it's the design which RLM approves.

    Now for the hard part. Does anyone have specifications for Dr. Tank's 1937 fighter proposal that was to be powered by a DB601 engine?

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    2,999
    Country
    United Kingdom
    Quote Originally Posted by woljags View Post
    Axis forces employed the same tactics as the british{ie faster types against fighters-spitfire/slower type against bombers-hurricane],
    A bit off topic but that isn't what the RAF did. It is another BoB myth,sometimes propagated by people who should know better,Bader springs to mind but then he wasn't in 11 Group.
    Squadrons were tasked to intercept a raid according to their geographical position and state of readiness. The composition of the force comprising the raid was irrelevant. It is possible (even likely given the relative numbers) that a raid would be intercepted by Hurricane equipped units with no Spitfires present at all.
    Cheers
    Steve

  8. #8
    Banned Siegfried's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    794
    Country
    Australia
    Quote Originally Posted by davebender View Post
    Possible but it won't be powered by a BMW801 engine.

    Point of Departure.
    1937. RLM kisses and makes up with Daimler-Benz management. Consequently Daimler-Benz engine programs will be fully funded.
    .....Genshagen DB601 engine plant receives 50 million RM funding as originally planned rather then being scaled back to 20 million RM.
    .....DB603 engine development and production will be fully funded.

    Dr. Tank preferred Daimler-Benz engines and that's what will power his new fighter aircraft. One of his 1937 fighter aircraft proposals was powered by a DB601 engine. It's the only single engine Focke Wulf fighter which can be in mass production during 1940 so for the sake of this scenerio it's the design which RLM approves.

    Now for the hard part. Does anyone have specifications for Dr. Tank's 1937 fighter proposal that was to be powered by a DB601 engine?
    The basic DB603 had been around a long time already. It's possible to immagine the following.

    DB603 ends up in FW 190D or Me 209-II or Me 309 style heavy fighter very early in the war, perhaps considerably earlier than the FW 190A1 appeared.
    It will be a fast 400mph machine (faster than the early 1.3 ata rated FW 190A1) from the get up and go. The Luftwaffe capitalises its advantage over the RAF to a much greater degree as the Mk.V to Mk.IX conversion will take longer.

    The DB601 is not modified into the slightly larger DB605 but instead the DB601E is simply made more refined with the emphasis on improving superchargers and detail refinements to cooling, lubrication, sparking, ignition etc. It hardly lags the DB605 at all.

    The emphasis on the DB603 means it is developed faster. Morover with the availabillity of the C3 fuel now transfered from BMW 801 to the DB603 the Luftwaffe gets a 1900 to 2000hp engine very early.

    The BMW 801D2 could produce 1700hp with C3 fuel (latter improved) however the DB603 could do 1750hp with B4 87 octane only and the more refined DB603E 1850hp. With the C3 transfered to the DB603A it becomes the DB603G with some 1900hp becomes available. The DB603E with all of the tricks used on the DB601E (inlet port tunning) gets 1850hp on B4 and over 2200-2300 on C3/MW50.

    These sorts of power levels ensure that the Luftwaffe would likely have a mass produced 430-440mph fighter in volume service by the time P-47C and P-51B start appearing.

    The BMW 801 is produced but is used as a 1585hp bomber engine on B4 fuel engine on Ju 88's as well as on transports such as the Ar 234 or bombers such as the He 177B. It replaces a lot of Jumo 211J engines wh8ch become available for transports.

    Premium Ju 88's get the DB603 with C3, providing the Luftwaffe with a bomber almost as fast as the Mosquito and certainly able to provide the Luftwaffe with a fast night fighter.

    The BMW 801 needed C3 fuel to produce adaquet peformance for a fighter, the DB603 would have excelled with this fuel.

    Junkers Jumo 213 becomes superflous and Junkers concentrates on the Jumo 004 and Jumo 222, the latter program not being suspended or delayed. This engine then comes into production in late 43 or early 44 and powers Ju 88, 188 and He 219 aircraft.
    Last edited by Siegfried; 03-04-2012 at 05:49 AM.

  9. #9
    Senior Member davebender's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Michigan, USA
    Posts
    5,380
    Country
    United States

    Premium Ju 88's get the DB603 with C3

    Commercial competition was fierce between Daimler-Benz and Junkers.

    If DB603 engine program funding isn't withdrawn during 1937 then Junkers would likely put their own Jumo 213 engine on the fast track even without RLM approval. Junkers would tell RLM the Jumo 213 is an advanced development of the generously funded Jumo 211 program rather then a new engine.

    I have no idea how soon the Jumo 213 could enter production but the Luftwaffe comes out ahead no matter what. The commercial threat posed by the Jumo 213 will cause Daimler-Benz to spare no effort at making the DB603 as good as it can be. Just as the commercial threat posed by the Jumo 211 caused Daimler-Benz to spare no effort at improving the DB605 engine.

  10. #10
    Banned Siegfried's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    794
    Country
    Australia
    Quote Originally Posted by davebender View Post
    Commercial competition was fierce between Daimler-Benz and Junkers.

    If DB603 engine program funding isn't withdrawn during 1937 then Junkers would likely put their own Jumo 213 engine on the fast track even without RLM approval. Junkers would tell RLM the Jumo 213 is an advanced development of the generously funded Jumo 211 program rather then a new engine.

    I have no idea how soon the Jumo 213 could enter production but the Luftwaffe comes out ahead no matter what. The commercial threat posed by the Jumo 213 will cause Daimler-Benz to spare no effort at making the DB603 as good as it can be. Just as the commercial threat posed by the Jumo 211 caused Daimler-Benz to spare no effort at improving the DB605 engine.
    I think you are correct re the competitiveness, junkers's decision to produce the Jumo 213 was a decision to go after the Daimler Benz's market;
    they even provided the same attachment points and cooland outlets.

    However I also see another scenario:

    As the sequential number suggest the larger 44L DB603 preceded the 34L DB605 (which was produced to enlarge the DB601 while still staying within the airframe contraints of the Me 109/Me 110)

    Hence the DB603 could have been available ahead of the DB605. DB605A entered service in May 1942 on the Me 109G1 based on using technology developed first
    in the DB601E, this technology being the tuned variable length inlet port that increased power enormously. So we can argue that the
    D B603E could have been available in 1942 with 1850hp.

    The DB603A with 1750hp certainly would have been available earlier than this since it first ran in 1936 say 1 year earlier. Rather than waste time engineering the DB605 the engineering effort goes straight into the bigger DB603 which comes available as a 1750hp unit in a debugged by early 1941.

    The unit can quickly be applied to the Ju 88 and the still in the future Ju 188 advancing those aircraft as well as the Do 217 (flying with Bramo 323 and underpowered even with BMW801). It goes straight into the Me 210. With enormous amounts of power available Willy Messerschmitt is not overly concerned with improving the Me 210 over the older Me 110. by aerodynamic refinements.

    He ruined the program and his company by shortening the tail and removing slats, the two factors which gave the aircraft its disasterous handling.

    With oodles of power the Me 210 looks like the Me 410 from the begining. It enters service in may 1941. I can easily outrun the Spitfire C, it can use its superior speed to actually hunt them.

    By the time the Spitfire IX comes in the Me 210 has moved to the DB603E and is faster still, not as fast as an IX at high altitude by as good at low.

    I then see the Me 109 retaining the DB601. The Me 109F thus continues to grow, remaining streamlined and fast. The DB601E was close to be being
    released at 1.58 ata, possibly with C3, either way this should have been a 416 mph machine. Daimler would just improve the supercharger and refine the
    engine. It might even be better than the DB605.

    Junkers might decide to try and jump ahead of DB by going straight for the Jumo 222.

    Very few Jumo 213 were built till 1944, they weren't important.

    There were advanced versions of the Jumo 211 beyond the Jumo 211J they include the Jumo 211N and Jumo 211P. I believe with multistage 3 speed superchargers. They themselves might have outpeformed the early Jumo 213's which had ineffient superchargers.

    With a big inverted V12 on the "FW 190D3" a motor canon is fitted, the FW 190D3 which allows removal of the outer wing guns and the cowling machine guns. The outer wing guns are replaced with fuel while the now absent cowling guns improve speed. The FW 190D4 becomes about a 650-700 mile range aircraft at maximum cruise, may 1000 with a drop tank.
    Last edited by Siegfried; 03-06-2012 at 05:52 PM.

  11. #11
    Creator of Interesting Threads tomo pauk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    4,582
    Country
    Croatia
    All seem feasible, but:

    There were advanced versions of the Jumo 211 beyond the Jumo 211J they include the Jumo 211N and Jumo 211P. I believe with multistage 3 speed superchargers. They themselves might have outpeformed the early Jumo 213's which had ineffient superchargers.
    Single stage, 3-speed speed, max powers circa 1500 HP. For high altitde the 211R was a decent one, 1130 HP @ 23600, Climb & combat power, fuel B4.

  12. #12
    Senior Member davebender's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Michigan, USA
    Posts
    5,380
    Country
    United States
    DB603 which comes available as a 1750hp unit in a debugged by early 1941
    .
    I agree. If DB603 engine program funding isn't cancelled by RLM then it enters mass production NLT 1941. Right on time to power the Fw-190 fighter and Do-217 bomber. Both aircraft will be a year too late for the BoB but they should enter service in time for Operation Barbarossa.

    unit can quickly be applied to the Ju 88 and the still in the future Ju 188
    That makes sense from an engineering standpoint. But Junkers will not power their aircraft with Daimler-Benz engines unless forced to do so.

    I then see the Me 109 retaining the DB601. The Me 109F thus continues to grow, remaining streamlined and fast. The DB601E was close to be being
    released at 1.58 ata, possibly with C3, either way this should have been a 416 mph machine. Daimler would just improve the supercharger and refine the
    engine. It might even be better than the DB605.
    Why wouldn't a 1,475 hp DB601 engine encounter the same growing pains as a 1,475 hp DB605 engine?

    Junkers might decide to try and jump ahead of DB by going straight for the Jumo 222
    They tried that historically and succceeded with the 2,000 hp Jumo 222A, only to be derailed by Milch. If Milch is fired / transferred / demoted then a bunch of things change and all of them benefit the Luftwaffe. But that's a major discussion all by itself.

  13. #13
    Senior Member johnbr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    London Ontario Canada
    Posts
    6,090
    Country
    Canada
    Me I would fire Milch and speed up production of ju-222 and the db-604.The Fw-190 would have been fast with them in.Why did they not test the Fw-190 with the Db-605.

  14. #14
    Senior Member davebender's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Michigan, USA
    Posts
    5,380
    Country
    United States
    speed up production of ju-222 and the db-604.
    April 1941. Jumo 222A engine passed 100 hour endurance test @ 2,000 hp (the orignal 1937 RLM specification required 2,000 hp). After this date Milch was the only thing preventing the 2,000 hp Jumo 222A engine from entering mass production.

    Did the DB604 engine pass a 100 hour endurance test @ 2,000 hp? If not then it won't be entering mass production.


    Why did they not test the Fw-190 with the Db-605.
    I think you mean DB601, which was one of the fighter aircraft proposals made by Dr. Tank during 1937.

    Fw-190s could not be produced with DB601 engines for the same reason as Fw-187s and He-100s. During October 1935 RLM reduced funding for the Genshagen DB601 engine factory from 50 million RM to 20 million RM. The funding decision was not reversed until 1940. Consequently Genshagen engine production was unable to meet demand prior to 1943.

    By 1943 RLM had spent so much money to develop the BMW801 engine that it was politically impossible to revert to Daimler-Benz engines like Dr. Tank wanted in the first place. Rather like the modern day F-35 which began development 16 November 1996, hasn't produced any operational aircraft and yet will never be cancelled.

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    maidenhead uk
    Posts
    1,322
    Country
    United Kingdom
    Blog Entries
    1
    so are we saying that one of the mistakes that was made at the start of the war by the German Government was that they did not fund proper development of aero engines at an early stage or that the politics of the aero companys and their backers held back the aero industry,some of the ideas put forward here are getting interesting ,i personally don't understand why when faster aircraft and engines available were not either further developed or fast tracked into production even if built by other company's under licence ,the Heinkel 100 springs to mind

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. German airframes, allied/foreign parts
    By tomo pauk in forum Aviation
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 06-26-2011, 04:40 AM
  2. F4U Corsair
    By nimrod.michaeli in forum Aviation
    Replies: 59
    Last Post: 03-09-2010, 09:59 AM
  3. Your 'What if?' Builds.
    By Airframes in forum Modeling
    Replies: 263
    Last Post: 01-26-2010, 09:35 AM
  4. The Best Bf - 109 Variant ?
    By lesofprimus in forum Old Threads
    Replies: 522
    Last Post: 07-12-2005, 11:35 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86