ADS NOT DISPLAYED TO REGISTERED USERS.
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 78
Like Tree1Likes

What If: Mosquitos vs Oil Targets

Aviation Discuss What If: Mosquitos vs Oil Targets in the World War II - Aviation forums; By my reckoning, using data from The de Havilland Mosquito Page , all Mosquito B.MkIV series ii had been manufactured ...

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Hobart Tasmania
    Posts
    2,265
    Country
    Australia

    What If: Mosquitos vs Oil Targets

    By my reckoning, using data from The de Havilland Mosquito Page, all Mosquito B.MkIV series ii had been manufactured by the end of March 1943. That means there were approximately 292 B.IVs floating around the UK somewhere (minus those already lost) by mid 1943.

    Is that a sufficient number to be able to mount effective raids against oil targets?

    The B.IX was in production from April 1943 until November 1943. The PR.IX, much the same as the B.IX were delivered from May 1943 until November 1943. There were 54 B.IXs and 90 PR.IXs built.

    The first Canadian built Mosquito, a B.VII was completed and test flown in October 1942. Some 25 B.VIIs were built before switching to B.XX production in mid 1943.



    So, if we say starting from June/July 1943 we would have approximately 200-250 bomber Mosquitos with a number in reserve coule we mount an effective campaign against German oil targets, the best part of a year before they historically happened?

    The B.IV and B.VII had the original, unstrengthened wing (the strengthened wing was introduced on the FB.VI and found its way onto the IX and XX) so could not carry external bombs or drop tanks. That limits their offensive load to 4 x 500lb bombs (maybe 2 x 1000lb bombs - but I am not sure of that) until the bulged bomb bay (late 1943) and the Avro bomb carrier for 6 x 500lb bombs (date unknown) are developed.

    mhuxt has posted a spreadsheet which sheds some light on Mosquito losses in daylight operations.

    As a side question, do you think bomber Mosquitos were underutilised by bomber command during the war, and particularly during late 1942/1943? There were certainly a lot more F.II/NF.IIs built than B.IVs. Could the production mix have been changed to make more bombers available sooner?

  2. #2
    Senior Member davebender's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Michigan, USA
    Posts
    5,215
    Country
    United States

    mount effective raids against oil targets?

    The most important German oil targets were in the Ruhr. That's a difficult place to bomb. Ploesti wasn't easy to bomb either.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    884
    Country
    Brazil
    Perhaps one reason for the Mosquito not be used for such attacks were unpredictable wartime situations. For example, the Allies planned to bomb the Soviet oilfields in the Caucasus in case the Germans captured them. The Mossie would be able to perform such a task?

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Hobart Tasmania
    Posts
    2,265
    Country
    Australia
    Quote Originally Posted by Jenisch View Post
    Perhaps one reason for the Mosquito not be used for such attacks were unpredictable wartime situations. For example, the Allies planned to bomb the Soviet oilfields in the Caucasus in case the Germans captured them. The Mossie would be able to perform such a task?
    "Planned to"? Were those fields actually bombed?

  5. #5
    Senior Member davebender's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Michigan, USA
    Posts
    5,215
    Country
    United States

    British priorities

    RAF Bomber Command had first priority for Mosquitos. Most were employed as high altitude path finders and on decoy missions. That's not likely to change as Britain spent 12.19% of her total military budget on RAF Bomber Command. PM Churchill will not allow Lancaster bombers to sit idle for lack of path finders.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Hobart Tasmania
    Posts
    2,265
    Country
    Australia
    Quote Originally Posted by davebender View Post
    The most important German oil targets were in the Ruhr. That's a difficult place to bomb. Ploesti wasn't easy to bomb either.
    Were they?

    What targets were there?

    Ploesti was beyond reach of Mosquitos, unless you were willing to launch a few off a carrier.
    Last edited by wuzak; 04-12-2012 at 08:34 AM.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Hobart Tasmania
    Posts
    2,265
    Country
    Australia
    Quote Originally Posted by davebender View Post
    RAF Bomber Command had first priority for Mosquitos. Most were employed as high altitude path finders and on decoy missions. That's not likely to change as Britain spent 12.19% of her total military budget on RAF Bomber Command. PM Churchill will not allow Lancaster bombers to sit idle for lack of path finders.
    Not all pathfinders were Mosquitos. Some were Lancasters.

    Pathfinding existed before Mosquitos filled the role, and Lancasters had been bombing before Mosquito pathfinders started helping them.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    884
    Country
    Brazil
    Quote Originally Posted by wuzak View Post
    "Planned to"? Were those fields actually bombed?
    No. But the plan was do it in case they were captured.

  9. #9
    Senior Member davebender's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Michigan, USA
    Posts
    5,215
    Country
    United States

    German synthetic fuel plants.

    Kurfürst - TECHNICAL REPORT NO. 145-45 MANUFACTURE OF AVIATION GASOLINE IN GERMANY.
    Sources and Supply of German Aviation.
    (All figures are barrels per day.)

    Company and Location
    Total Aviation Components
    Base Stocks & Aromatics
    Synthetic Isoparaffins

    I.G. - Leuna
    6,900
    5,500
    1,400

    Brabag - Böhlen
    4,100
    4,100
    --

    Brabag - Magdeburg
    2,750
    2,750
    --

    Hibernia - Scholven Ruhr area.
    5,800
    4,400
    1,400

    Gelsenberg - Gelsenkirchen Ruhr area.
    8,000
    8,000
    --

    Pölitz A.G. - Pölitz Stettin area.
    13,900
    12,400
    1,500

    Rheinbraun - Wesseling Ruhr area.
    2,750
    2,750
    --

    Ruhröl - Welheim Ruhr area.
    1,100
    1,100
    --

    Sudetendeutsche - Brüx
    5,500
    5,500
    --

    I.G. - Oppau
    1,200
    1,100
    100

    I.G. - Heydebrek
    600
    300
    300

    I.G. - Moosbierbaum
    2,000
    2,000
    --

    I.G. - Hüls
    200
    200
    --

    I.G. - Schopau
    200
    200
    --


    Pölitz A.G. should be easy to hit if a Mosquito can carry a useful bomb load all the way to Stettin. Destroying that hydrogenation plant and keeping it destroyed would put a sizable dent in Luftwaffe fuel supplies.

  10. #10
    Creator of Interesting Threads tomo pauk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    4,474
    Country
    Croatia
    We could need some additional data 1st, before making the assesment.
    How many tons of bombs would render the 'oil target' inoperable? How big a percentage of the oil targets was in Mossie's range? Was it feasible to launch Mosquitos against Ploesti, once Sicily was taken?

    added: Seem like Dave answers my questions before I'm posting them

  11. #11
    Senior Member davebender's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Michigan, USA
    Posts
    5,215
    Country
    United States

    How many tons of bombs would render the 'oil target' inoperable?

    I suspect a hundred 500lb bombs would do the trick. The catch is they've got to hit the target. Which means aircraft must bomb from low altitude, within range of light flak. Crack AA gunners like tomo pauk will be peppering your aircraft with 20mm and 37mm shells.

    How much protective armor was incorporated into the Mosquito light bomber?

  12. #12

  13. #13
    Creator of Interesting Threads tomo pauk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    4,474
    Country
    Croatia
    Quote Originally Posted by davebender View Post
    ...
    Crack AA gunners like tomo pauk will be peppering your aircraft with 20mm and 37mm shells.
    ...
    Actually the 30mm is my pair of shoes, but anything goes

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Hobart Tasmania
    Posts
    2,265
    Country
    Australia
    Quote Originally Posted by davebender View Post
    I suspect a hundred 500lb bombs would do the trick. The catch is they've got to hit the target. Which means aircraft must bomb from low altitude, within range of light flak. Crack AA gunners like tomo pauk will be peppering your aircraft with 20mm and 37mm shells.

    How much protective armor was incorporated into the Mosquito light bomber?
    Not much armour.

    100 500lb bombs requires but 25 Mosquitos given 100% accuracy. But, of course, asking for 100% accuracy is too much.

    At low level you could, probably, expect 50% or better. In one youtube clip about the 2TAF it was claimed that on the mission shown 28 bombs hit the target (a house) from 18 FB.VIs - which means 28/36 = 78%.

    So, then you have to allow for losses. Loss rates on low level raids were getting down to around 6% by mid 1943. Let's call it 10%. So, to get 100 bombs on target you need 25 Mossies to hit the target, with a 50% accuracy rate that means 50 Mossies have to bomb the target, with a loss rate of 10% you need to send 56 bombers.

    Throw in some F.IIs (plenty built, though many converted to NF.II configuration) for some degree of fighter protection, and to interfere with the flak guns (sorry Tomo!).

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Hobart Tasmania
    Posts
    2,265
    Country
    Australia
    Quote Originally Posted by tomo pauk View Post
    We could need some additional data 1st, before making the assesment.
    How many tons of bombs would render the 'oil target' inoperable? How big a percentage of the oil targets was in Mossie's range? Was it feasible to launch Mosquitos against Ploesti, once Sicily was taken?

    added: Seem like Dave answers my questions before I'm posting them
    It depends when Sicily was taken, and how far Ploesti was from there. Later Mosquitos could carry drop tanks under the wing, which the early ones couldn't.

    B.IVs could get to and from Berlin comfortably. The Ruhr targets were all well within range. Leuna was closer than Berlin, as was Magdeburg, Pölitz, Oppau and Hüls. Böhlen and Schopau are about the same, maybe a little further. Brüx looks to be further, perhaps close to the edge of the B.IV's range. Moosbierbaum looks to be too far, as does Heydebrek.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86