Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums

What of the Me 410?

Aviation Discuss What of the Me 410? in the World War II - Aviation forums; you have posted what was suppose to be in the gruppen but what they had serviceable would be an interesting ...


Go Back   Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums > World War II - Aviation > Aviation

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 02-15-2007, 05:01 PM   #151
the old Sage
 
Erich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Platonic Sphere
Posts: 9,511
Country:
you have posted what was suppose to be in the gruppen but what they had serviceable would be an interesting counter, ZG 26 was getting wipped by US escorts from the skies in 44 until they became cadre for other single engine units.
I am not in total agreement with M.H.'s website on several other units portions but it is understandable with errors, everything is that way
Erich is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2007, 06:13 PM   #152
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,260
Quote:
Originally Posted by Civettone View Post
Udet;

- there's no shortage of rear gunners, especially not when taking the Ju 87 and other bombers out of production. Let's stick to pilots, ok?

- Fuel production dropped below the fuel consumption in June 1944. So up to that time there were no Bf 109s being grounded because of the Me 410. Up til that time the Luftwaffe got something like 200,000 ton a month. I think that puts your 200 ton into perspective.

- you mention 5000 l internal fuel but you know just as well as I do that you don't need to fill them up all the way. The Me 410 could fly at least three times as far as a Bf 109. So bring back that 200,000 liters to 75,000...

Kris
Civ:

I will rephrase my idea.

The core of this notion is the widely known fact Germany was not a rich nation in terms of natural resources and men.

Germany faced critical shortages of so many materials and items, like fuel, during the last year of the war having maintained the Zerstörergeschwadern in service to carry on with daylight missions in during the last part of 1943 and virtually through the entire 1944 -Reichsverteidigung-was a horrifying mistake.

Germany was facing the air forces of three main enemies: USAAF, RAF and VVS, although in my view the most fundamental air force was the USAAF hands down-, something that for practical purposes is about impossible.

It is in view of such a clear situation of disadvantage Germany could not afford to continue allocating material resources (raw materials for engines and spare parts, weapons, ammo, fuel, etc.) and workforce for producing more twin-engined fighters and BOMBERS (!) during 1944.

I am sure you know these facts Civ so i have to say i disagree to read you consider the zerstörern should remain in service even for the last part of 1943 when escorts did not yet attain the necessary range to protect the bombers during the whole bombing run. But what makes me feel nearly shocked is to read you think Germany should have continued producing bombers during 1944...

German planners knew perfectly well what was coming regarding aerial combat over the Reich. They had the necessary time to have the strategy revamped but instead decided to put it all in the dustbin and simply continued producing aircraft that were no longer necessary for the Luftwaffe. Terrible mistake and they paid accordingly.

1944 would have been, as it occured, a brutal year in European skies, and Germany could have had far more single engined fighters with the required pilots to batter the USAAF.

Had Germany disbanded all the ZG and most of the KG by the end of 1943, converting all pilots and the bulk of the crews to single engined fighter pilots and there is this chance the USAAF would not even dare to mention the overhyped Mustang preferring to keep it in a low profile.

In terms of raw materials a Me 210 or 410 could spawn a couple of Bf 109s.

It is difficult for me to understand anyone might fail to see how terrible that can be for a small nation with limited access to resources that is waging a war against a large common enemy.

I know a Me 410 and Bf 110 had a pilot and rear gunner Civ; so what´s your point? All those who performed as radio operator/rear gunners during 1944 could not be trained to become single engined fighter pilots?

Every guy who died as rear gunner during 1944 on a Me 410 or Bf 110 represented a pointless loss.

Also your comment bomber crews do not make good pilots is odd; how come? I agree not everyone has the talent to become a fighter pilot -or to perform any profession you can think of-, but how is it being a bomber crewman makes you unfit for becoming a Bf 109 or Fw 190 pilot? I know of a large number of cases of bomber crewmen who not only flew in He 111s as gunners, bombers or radio operators they also became aces flying in BF 109s or Fw 190s.

Your second point on the last posting: I neither said nor suggested single-engined fighters were staying on the ground because the Me 410s were stealing their fuel Civ -although it is not daring to affirm such a thing indeed could have happened after the summer of 1944-.

My point was just to illustrate how inclined to waste the German style of waging the aerial war was during late 1943 and through the whole 1944. Wasteful. Wasteful to death.

A complete mess and lack of efficiency in terms of resources management. Instead of the rough 80 Me 410s serving in any ZG during mid 1944 the Luftwaffe could have had 160 Bf 109 G-6/AS or G-10s Civ.

160 Bf 109s? We are nearly talking about a complete geschwader. How come you can not see this?

Well, i know my father does not need to fill the whole tank of his car to keep it going. But do you have any copies of formats that might show how many liters were being dispensed into a Me 410 before mission?

Ok Civ. 75,000 liters of fuel will help you putting 187 Bf 109s to go up and gut P-51s, P-47s and P-38s.

187 Bf 109s -or Fw 190s- can represent a Jagdgeschwader with the stab., three gruppen and the Ergänzungsgruppe.

187 Bf 109s or Fw 190s that never came to life because raw materials, assembly facilities and workforce were instead being allocated to produce Me 410s, Bf 110s and bombers... bloody messy planning from the German part.

Do you agree it was wasteful Civ?
__________________
In a national survey, 92% of the French people believed they are not ugly: 93% of them were wrong.

Last edited by Udet : 02-16-2007 at 01:20 AM.
Udet is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2007, 06:47 PM   #153
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 43
What is the use of all these extra 109s/190s when there is not enough trained and qualified pilots to fly them?

The JGs already did not have enough fuel so the fuel saved from the disbadoning of the ZGs would only give extra fuel to the already existing JGs. The extra 109s/190s would be still short of fuel.
Morai_Milo is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2007, 07:46 PM   #154
Senior Member
 
CRASHGATE3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 207
Country:
Guys...an excellent thread on the Me410....thanks.
You may be interested in this pic I took a few days ago at the Royal Air Force museum at Cosford
Sorry no history but the sign said Me410A-1/U2 and the markings were 3U (in black) + C (in red on white band) C(in black)
Attached Images
File Type: jpg me410.jpg (310.6 KB, 95 views)
CRASHGATE3 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2007, 11:53 PM   #155
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,260
Quote:
Originally Posted by Morai_Milo View Post
What is the use of all these extra 109s/190s when there is not enough trained and qualified pilots to fly them?

The JGs already did not have enough fuel so the fuel saved from the disbadoning of the ZGs would only give extra fuel to the already existing JGs. The extra 109s/190s would be still short of fuel.

The disbandment of all ZGs is one factor, and the other is the disbanding of several KG.

Focusing on the critical year of 1944: Germany produced ~2,050 bombers (He 111, Ju 88, Ju 188 and He 177 plus a handful of other types), plus ~800 Me 210s/Me 410s and even ~110 Bf 110s. Tell me of anything significant these planes achieved during 1944.

~2,960 ships, all of them machines with 2 engines. With a serviceability rate of 50% for all those planes produced during 1944 you seriously believe only "some extra fuel" could have been given to the "existing JGs"?

More than that in fact for it would have helped having fuel for JGs that did not even come to life. Think of the math...if the fuel of one single Me 410 A-1 or B-1 could put a staffel of single-engined fighters up in the air, then you can try to figure out the issue with all those thousands of twin engined planes the Luftwaffe was no longer requiring during 1944 but that were produced and saw service.

All those men, planes and fuel stupidly lost during the Baby Blitz of the first months 1944 over England...you are not going to deny it was a stupid commitment of men and war materiel and fuel are you? Want to check the number of sorties flown by the ~490 bombers that took part in that senseless "campaign" to come up with a figure of fuel consumed?

The "extra" Bf 109s and Fw190s i am referring to could indeed have been more than 2,000 machines for the second half of 1944 with sufficient pilots to fly them in combat. So add 2,000 planes to the known order of battle of West/Reich Luftwaffe between jul-december 1944.

Hypothetical scenario: the sturmkinder flying Fw 190 A-8/R8s of IV (sturm)./JG 3 or II. (sturm)/JG 4 are provided with top cover flight of 300 Bf 109 G-6/AS on every mission flown...give the USAAF 7 or 8 episodes of dimensions identical to that of the Kassel raid of the poor devils of the 445th BG in one month and believe me, the guys in the USAAF will not be sure whether to continue the aerial war.

Such 2,000 single-engined ships will consume much much less fuel than half the total of bombers produced by Germany during 1944.

I have table lists with production and deliveries of bombers and twin-engined fighters to KG and ZG for every month of 1944 and it is clearly seen it was a 100% wasteful kind of war management from the german part.

Training of German pilots was sufficient to produce the type of pilots necessary to fly the planes for the second half of 1944; certainly training programs and schedules were shortened but that a pilot was "green" does not mean he was "ill-trained" as it has been conviniently presented by the allies.

Chances are you are not yet convinced producing Me 210s/410s and Bf 110s during 1944 was a foolish thing; you can be sure whatever your approach might be, it will be proven it would have been wiser to instead produce only single-engined fighters.

(i) Raw materials.
(ii) Workforce.
(iii) Number of engines.
(iv) Crew.
(v) Ground crews/maintenance (technicians, mechanics, armorers, etc.)
(vi) Fuel.

In conclusion: 2 engined planes are more expensive (raw materials and workforce) and tale more time to be produced.

A large nation, with a large territory -distant from where the fight is-, and with open access to the natural resources and raw materials of vast regions like the USA could afford planning and organizational mistakes...Germany could not but did...
__________________
In a national survey, 92% of the French people believed they are not ugly: 93% of them were wrong.

Last edited by Udet : 02-16-2007 at 12:45 AM.
Udet is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2007, 07:44 PM   #156
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 24
Country:
Looks like this thread has been going on a loooong loooong time, I think I may be unique among the members discussing the me 410 because I have actually crawled through the only surviving Me410 in anything like a complete condition.
I worked at Cosford as a volunteer in the late 70's early 80's with the Society there and for something like eighteen months cleaned tidied and examined the aircraft as much as possible, since then she has been to St Athan where her engines were actually run by the technicians there and ahd some work done before coming back to Cosford.
As I see it having sat in the rear fuselage directly forward of the turret mechanism for the rear firing weapons the aircraft could have well done without it and its extra weight, all you see on the outside is a couple of blisters and two gun barrels but inside is a bloody great piece of electrically driven machinery weighing about a ton.
It is very complicated and heavy and why they persisted with it I dont know because unless the target was directly behind and some distance away only one gun could be fired, a pair of 13mm machine guns in the rear cockpit would have been more efficient and would double the firepower plus save a massive amount of weight behind the main wing which could only improve handling and stability.
Gimmeacannon! is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2007, 07:55 PM   #157
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 24
Country:
The Me410 at Cosford is a A1/U2 and was captured at Vaerlose in Denmark and was then flown to Schleswig then on to Farnbourough on 13th October 1945.
On 28th December 1945 it was flown to Brize Norton and in August 1946 was allocated to 76 MU Wroughton for museum storage, for some years she was in storage at the German Air Force Equipment Centre at No 4 MU Stanmore Park.By 1960 she had been moved to RAF Fulbeck then in 1961 was moved to RAF Cosford for storage.
She is fitted with DB603A-2 engines and her Werk Nummer is 420430.
Gimmeacannon! is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2007, 09:11 PM   #158
Senior Member
 
CRASHGATE3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 207
Country:
Thanx for filling in the details on the Me410 at Cosford.
I didnt have much time to read all the info...too busy taking pix !!
I would have loved to get in the cockpit though !
CRASHGATE3 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2007, 09:23 PM   #159
Senior Member
 
syscom3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 8,478
Quote:
Originally Posted by Udet View Post
......
Hypothetical scenario: the sturmkinder flying Fw 190 A-8/R8s of IV (sturm)./JG 3 or II. (sturm)/JG 4 are provided with top cover flight of 300 Bf 109 G-6/AS on every mission flown...give the USAAF 7 or 8 episodes of dimensions identical to that of the Kassel raid of the poor devils of the 445th BG in one month and believe me, the guys in the USAAF will not be sure whether to continue the aerial war.........
Thats assuming that the escorting fighters were not in a position to intercept those fighters, or were outnumbered to the extent they couldn't stop them. That was a rare and infrequent event.

As Erich mentioned in multiple threads, the twin engined "bomber killers" that flew in daylight were meat on the plate for the allied fighters. Even for the P38's.
__________________
"Pilot to copilot..... what are those mountain goats doing up here in the clouds?"
syscom3 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2007, 10:51 PM   #160
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,260
Quote:
Originally Posted by syscom3 View Post
Thats assuming that the escorting fighters were not in a position to intercept those fighters, or were outnumbered to the extent they couldn't stop them. That was a rare and infrequent event.

As Erich mentioned in multiple threads, the twin engined "bomber killers" that flew in daylight were meat on the plate for the allied fighters. Even for the P38's.
Incorrect. I am assuming any kind of escorts available in the USAAF are in the area.

Instead of 40, 50, 60 or 70 Bf 109s flying top cover for the sturmgruppen no less than 300 escorts could have been available on every mission flown if German planners had bothered to attempt putting their stuff together.

I repeat no less than 300 and even 400 Bf 109 G-6/AS against whatever number of the overhyped Mustangs you might want to come up with. Say 350 German escorts against what...500 P-51s?

7 or 8 "Kassels" per month; do not forget the guys of the 445th BG did belong in a side that is not good at swallowing high losses.
__________________
In a national survey, 92% of the French people believed they are not ugly: 93% of them were wrong.
Udet is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2007, 11:05 PM   #161
Senior Member
 
syscom3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 8,478
Quote:
Originally Posted by Udet View Post
Instead of 40, 50, 60 or 70 Bf 109s flying top cover for the sturmgruppen no less than 300 escorts could have been available on every mission flown if German planners had bothered to attempt putting their stuff together.
Thats just all the more potential targets for the 8th, 9th and 15th AF fighters to go after.

Quote:
I repeat no less than 300 and even 400 Bf 109 G-6/AS against whatever number of the overhyped Mustangs you might want to come up with. Say 350 German escorts against what...500 P-51s?
The P51 is overhyped?

Quote:
7 or 8 "Kassels" per month; do not forget the guys of the 445th BG did belong in a side that is not good at swallowing high losses.
And youre assuming that the Luftwaffee would not be taking losses? If anything, the Germans had little capacity to replenish pilot losses.
__________________
"Pilot to copilot..... what are those mountain goats doing up here in the clouds?"
syscom3 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2007, 11:26 PM   #162
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,260
syscom:

The Luftwaffe will of course take losses, but those men would have been lost in battle flying single-engined fighters and not twin-engined crafts much less bombers.

The capacity of the USAAF to replace their dead has too been greatly exaggerated; again, the USA was not a tyranny where the lives of their men in the frontlines meant less than feces.

Are you going to deny that during the last part of 1943 the USAAF could not yet feel bold enough to claim victory was "imminent" in the air?

Several huge blows suffered by the USAAF in a brief period of time during 1944 and you put them to tremble.

Ahh and yes the P-51 is bigtime an overhyped plane.
__________________
In a national survey, 92% of the French people believed they are not ugly: 93% of them were wrong.

Last edited by Udet : 02-16-2007 at 11:34 PM.
Udet is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2007, 11:32 PM   #163
Hairy one of Old Judea
 
kiwimac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Deepest Darkest NZ
Posts: 1,143
Country:
Send a message via ICQ to kiwimac Send a message via AIM to kiwimac Send a message via MSN to kiwimac Send a message via Yahoo to kiwimac Send a message via Skype™ to kiwimac
No matter how good a single-engined fighter is, there is one 'theatre' where the twin is better and that is night-fighting. I agree that the Luftwaffe's general staff could have done better by disbanding the day twin units but I'm not certain about the night ones, which I think leaves us in the position of having perhaps enough fighters to combat the USAAF but not enough to combat the RAF at night.
__________________
kiwimac is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2007, 11:52 PM   #164
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,260
Kiwi i completely agree with you, but if you notice i did say the production of twin-engined planes continues to maintain an adequate nachtjagdverbände.

Even in that respect the Germans behaved messy and disorganized...again -sorry for getting so repetitive- during the critical year of 1944 the NJGs had Ju 88 C, Bf 110 G, He 219 A and Do 217s as night fighters!!! Why so many types of planes during a time of critical shortages and urgent necessities? Why not only one type? Standardization, optimising of scarce resources!
__________________
In a national survey, 92% of the French people believed they are not ugly: 93% of them were wrong.

Last edited by Udet : 02-17-2007 at 12:00 AM.
Udet is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2007, 11:57 PM   #165
Hairy one of Old Judea
 
kiwimac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Deepest Darkest NZ
Posts: 1,143
Country:
Send a message via ICQ to kiwimac Send a message via AIM to kiwimac Send a message via MSN to kiwimac Send a message via Yahoo to kiwimac Send a message via Skype™ to kiwimac
Oh, I agree udet, I agree. Perhaps they should have stuck with the JU 88c or developed somewhat the HE 219 but one or (at the most) two would have been better than the 4 or so that they actually had, including some poor souls in 109Es for goodness sake!
__________________
kiwimac is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
   

AVIATION TOP 100 - www.avitop.com Avitop.com


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45