![]() |
| |||||||
| Aviation Discussion on the aircraft of WWII. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #16 |
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,082
| |
| | |
| | #17 |
| Senior Member | Hahaha thats wierd Odd, very odd |
| | |
| | #18 |
| The Pop-Tart Whisperer ![]() Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: South Jersey, United States
Posts: 11,833
| Thats great Elvis. Sometimes something is so common that when something similar comes along you forget what you're snickering at!
__________________ ![]() "If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it's English, thank a soldier!" |
| | |
| | #19 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Little Norway, U.S.A.
Posts: 816
| Thanks, Njaco! I figure the idea was probably inspired by the German's efforts, though. ...wouldn't be the first time. Elvis |
| | |
| | #20 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Serbia
Posts: 421
| Those Mistel configurations were really weird. I believe the first picture shows the proposed piloted version of a V-1 flying bomb. |
| | |
| | #21 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,851
| No, it was the Me 328 V1 in it's test mounting. The piloted version of the V1 flying bomb was the Fiesler Fi-103R Reichenberg, which although similar in concept, has a number of noticable differences. |
| | |
| | #22 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,851
| According to ’Mistel; Die Hucke-pack-Flugzeuge der Luftwaffe bis 1945’ (’The piggy-back aircraft of the Luftwaffe’) by Hans-Peter Dabrowski: Aircraft mounted in ’Mistel’ set-up for flight testing (ie, not intended for use as Mistel) Messerschmitt Me 328 V1 atop a Dornier Do 217E (1943) Messerschmitt Me 328B atop a Do 217E-2 (1945) DFS 228 atop a Dornier Do 217K-3 (194?) Bachem Ba 349 Natter atop a Heinkel He 111 (194?) First Mistel aircraft test combinations (codes as per photos): 1. DFS 230 (CB+ZB) with Klemm KL 35 (D-EXCM) control aircraft 2. DFS 230 (CB+ZB) with Focke-Wulf Fw 56 Stösser (GA+GN) control aircraft 3. DFS 230 (D-IEXX and D-14??) with Messerschmitt Bf 109E (no visible codes) Foreign ’Mistel’: The first to use the Mistel idea outside of Germany were the Italians, who used Savoia Marchetti Sm.79 aircraft as ’Grossbomben’ (’Giant bombs’) The USAAF used „Aphrodite” aircraft, which were remotely controlled bombers (mostly war-weary Boeing B-17s) filled with circa 10 tons of Torpex explosive and painted bright yellow or white. (More info in book if anyone's interested) |
| | |
| | #23 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Little Norway, U.S.A.
Posts: 816
| Quote:
I seem to remember them shooting that one off the ramp (ala V-1), but we all know how Hollywood like to take "Artistic Liberty's". Elvis | |
| | |
| | #24 |
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,082
| |
| | |
| | #25 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Little Norway, U.S.A.
Posts: 816
| |
| | |
| | #26 |
| The Pop-Tart Whisperer ![]() Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: South Jersey, United States
Posts: 11,833
|
__________________ ![]() "If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it's English, thank a soldier!" |
| | |
| | #27 |
| Banned Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Pine Mountain Lake, California
Posts: 981
| I know that, toward the end of the War, the Germans were experimenting with their own version of the Ohka Japanese kamikaze rocket plane; called Reichenbergs, they were, essentially, piloted V-1 bombs. Hanna Reitsch was big proponent of the Reichenbergs, and promoted them as the only way to stop the massive Allied air attacks on her homeland. The unit on top looks like a Reichenberg, but made by a different manufacturer. |
| | |
| | #28 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 2,412
| The Manned V-1 had better performance than the Ohka, and much better range. (2-300 miles, 400+ mph at full throttle at low altitude) They would have been much more useful as kamikazi weapons for the japanese with bombers not having to get too close (and getting shot down) and the possibility of land based operations. Or maybe an Ohka powered by a pulse jet. (the engines being very chap and simple to build) Though the whole discussion of this is a bit morbid... The only problem with a pulse jet fighter (besides vibration and fuel consumption) is a large drop in thrust with altitude. |
| | |
| | #29 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,851
| Interesting, thanks Kool Kitty! ..And Elvis...! |
| | |
| | #30 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Munich
Posts: 305
| Quote:
| |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |