ADS NOT DISPLAYED TO REGISTERED USERS.
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 165
Like Tree3Likes

What protoype do you wish had seen service in WW2?

Aviation Discuss What protoype do you wish had seen service in WW2? in the World War II - Aviation forums; As the topic says, what prototype bomber, fighter, transport or jet do you wish had seen squadron service during the ...

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Japan
    Posts
    912

    What protoype do you wish had seen service in WW2?

    As the topic says, what prototype bomber, fighter, transport or jet do you wish had seen squadron service during the war, and why?

    Personally, I wish that the single stage Merlin engined Whirlwind prototype had gone into production. If it could do 360 mph on those anemic little Pegasus engines, imagine the performance with a pair of 1200 hp Merlin XIIs.
    Whirly Mk IIs would of been great, its such a pity that the fluffed up the design so much with the Welkin. Clip the wing tips, add a semi-recessed centerline bomb mount, keep it below about 20,000 feet and give it a belt feed for the Hispanos, even if you have to sacrifice one of the cannons to pad out the ammo capacity.



    The other great British 'also ran' for me was the Martin Baker MB.5. If only because it looks like the msibeggotten love child of a P-51D and a Griffon engined Spitfire

    EDIT: NO paper planes! It must have at least been built in prototype form and either been ready to fly or have flown. Otherwise this just degenirates into a Luft'46 thing.

  2. #2
    Pacific Historian syscom3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    12,112
    Does this include prototypes that flew towards the end of the war, then went into active service?
    "Pilot to copilot..... what are those mountain goats doing up here in the clouds?"

  3. #3
    the old Sage Erich's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Platonic Sphere
    Posts
    12,916
    Country
    United States
    most likely one of the late war paper jet pieces from Germany

  4. #4
    Pacific Historian syscom3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    12,112
    I'd like to have seen the F8F, F7F and Skyraiders to see service.
    "Pilot to copilot..... what are those mountain goats doing up here in the clouds?"

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    London
    Posts
    5,433
    Hornet for me.

  6. #6
    IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO FLYBOYJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Colorado, USA
    Posts
    20,526
    Country
    United States
    XP-55 Acender - I know it looked better than it flew

  7. #7
    Senior Member Marshall_Stack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    393
    Country
    United States
    The Vought aircraft that was made for the navy which had v-stol characteristics and approached 500 mph. It looked like a saucer with two Allison in-line engines in front. It was the XF5U-1 "Flying Flapjack.

  8. #8
    JCS
    JCS is offline
    Senior Member JCS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Nicholson, PA
    Posts
    672
    Country
    United States
    Either the Do335 or Re.2006 for me.

  9. #9
    Senior Member wmaxt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Boise, Idaho
    Posts
    1,207
    P-38K, P-80 of course. The other planes listed would have been cool to.

    wmaxt

  10. #10
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    20
    I would have loved to see the Lockheed P2V-1 Neptunes in service for large tactical aircraft. For fighter's I would have liked to see Ryan FR-1 Fireball and the F8F Bearcat. If Japan had been invaded these would have seen active service. I wonder how the prototypes of the B-32 and B-36 were coming along in 1945? Germany had some interesting jets on the drawing board too and if they had seen squadron service it may have prolonged the war.

    The Wright R-3350 and the PW R-4360 were still very buggy engines in 1945. I don't think they ever solved all the 4360's problems.

  11. #11
    Senior Member wmaxt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Boise, Idaho
    Posts
    1,207
    Quote Originally Posted by quayhog
    I would have loved to see the Lockheed P2V-1 Neptunes in service for large tactical aircraft. For fighter's I would have liked to see Ryan FR-1 Fireball and the F8F Bearcat. If Japan had been invaded these would have seen active service. I wonder how the prototypes of the B-32 and B-36 were coming along in 1945? Germany had some interesting jets on the drawing board too and if they had seen squadron service it may have prolonged the war.

    The Wright R-3350 and the PW R-4360 were still very buggy engines in 1945. I don't think they ever solved all the 4360's problems.
    The Bearcat would have done fine in the Japanese invasion but if it had gone to the ETO its short range and slow top speed would have been serious deficencies. Its focus was Kamakazies and direct carrier defense and was pretty much useless anywhere else, thats why it was never even considered for wider use by the Navy and was gone before the Corsair.

    The B36 first flew August '46 and the first production plane in August '47.

    The Ryan fireball had a good name pretty much describing its usefulness.

    There's some truth in that. The 4360 only had a 350/400hr service life and at 1.8 million thats not exactly economical.

    wmaxt

  12. #12
    "Shooter" evangilder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Moorpark, CA
    Posts
    18,839
    Country
    United States
    Slow top speed? The F8F had a top speed of 421 MPH. That's not that slow. It was never intended for ETO use.


    > I Support Doug Gilliss <

    For once you have tasted flight you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skywards, for there you have been and there you will long to return. Leonardo Da Vinci

  13. #13
    Pacific Historian syscom3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    12,112
    [quote="wmaxt"]
    Quote Originally Posted by quayhog
    There's some truth in that. The 4360 only had a 350/400hr service life and at 1.8 million thats not exactly economical.
    350 to 400 hours to rebuild or disposal?
    "Pilot to copilot..... what are those mountain goats doing up here in the clouds?"

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Japan
    Posts
    912
    Quote Originally Posted by evangilder
    Slow top speed? The F8F had a top speed of 421 MPH. That's not that slow. It was never intended for ETO use.
    425 mph isn't that slow for the ETO. Sure, on paper it doesn't match the 450mph or so of the P-51B, Spitfire XIV, 109K but that still puts it in the same class as the 190A serise, 190D serise, 109G-10, P-38L, Typhoon and Tempest. Its faster than a Spitfire Mk IX or a 109G-6 which were still front line types right up until VE Day.

  15. #15
    Senior Member Marshall_Stack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    393
    Country
    United States
    The B-32 Dominator did see service in the pacific theatre. They made raids on the oil fields in the Dutch East Indies and one of the last raids of Japan.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86