Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums

Will the real cyclic rate please stand up.

Aviation Discuss Will the real cyclic rate please stand up. in the World War II - Aviation forums; I have heard claims about the U.S. M2 .50 cal had a cyclic rate that ranged from 700rpm to ...


Go Back   Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums > World War II - Aviation > Aviation

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 05-21-2006, 03:29 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 12
Country:
Will the real cyclic rate please stand up.

I have heard claims about the U.S. M2 .50 cal had a cyclic rate that ranged from 700rpm to 850rpm.

So what was the real cyclic rate of this gun?

I have always thought it was 750rpm.
Squeelig is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2006, 03:37 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Phila, Pa
Posts: 2,198
Country:
I fired them years ago and it seemed (giving space for the last 20 some odd years) a bit lower. Probably closer to 600 rpm.

I know some of the better gunners at the school (usually Seabees) could tap of single shots from the thing. Plenty of experience.

Also, it jammed all the time. Not a hard, break the thing down jam. More along the lines of a recharge it a couple of times and get to it. Could've been the guns, could've been the ammo but it was unusual to go through more than 20rds without a stopage.
timshatz is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2006, 01:27 PM   #3
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 12
Country:
The M2 was considered extremely reliable in its use on aircraft in WWII. As I have been searching further on this subject I seen some figures on cyclic rate as low as 550rpm.
Squeelig is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2006, 02:36 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 239
Depends whether its syncronised or not.
red admiral is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2006, 02:24 PM   #5
Dac
Senior Member
 
Dac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 147
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Squeelig
I have heard claims about the U.S. M2 .50 cal had a cyclic rate that ranged from 700rpm to 850rpm.

So what was the real cyclic rate of this gun?

I have always thought it was 750rpm.
I think your rates are right for the M2, and at the end of the war the new M3 .50 cal boosted the rate to 1200rpm. This is the gun used on the F-86 in Korea.
Dac is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2006, 07:47 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Japan
Posts: 451
I have a copy of a post war manual for 'Gun, Automatic, .50 calibre, M2' and the rate of fire is given as between 750 and 850 rpm. All kinds of things can affect the RoF of a weapon, from the build quality or factory it was made in, atmospheric conditions, ammunition quality, type of belting, type of ammunition being fired ect ect.

I think the lower RoFs were for the ground based versions of the "Ma Duece", somewhere between about 450-600, depending on the exact version and the adjustments made to the guns.

Interestingly, the US AN-M2 20mm (the US version of the 20mm Hispano Mk II) gives the RoF for the gun as 600-700 rpm. The RAAF ordanance guys used to competitively 'tune' the 20mm fitted to their Beaufighters, getting as high as 1,000 rpm in firing tests ( the winner with the fastest firing cannon got a crate of whisky). As the .50 Browning was quite suceptiable to armourers adjustments, I'm sure it could of been 'tuned' up to that level or maybe even higher. Reliability would be something of an issue though.
Jabberwocky is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2006, 06:37 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
k9kiwi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Kiwi Land
Posts: 848
Country:
Also Air Gunners learnt that if they sent home and got bundles of pennies sent over they could replace the buffer pads with the coins.

That was one of the fastest ways to increase firing rates, although it was hard on the guns.
k9kiwi is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2006, 11:42 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 254
Country:
The original speed of the aircraft .50 M2 was around 700 rpm (the heavy-barrel ground gun did about 450-550 rpm). The water-cooled naval AA version also did 700 rpm. The aircraft M2 was 'tweaked' a bit around 1940 which raised its rpm to up to 900 rpm. However, as others have commented the actual RoF varied quite a bit depending on such factors as the age and condition of the gun, the installation and so on, so 750-850 rpm is normally quoted as the typical range.

Synchronised installations saw a big fall-off in RoF, with an average of 400-450 rpm being typical. This affected early P-40 and P-51, and the P-39/63 family. The big Browning appeared to have been particularly badly affected by synchronisation, others did not lose so much (the German guns in particular lost only about 10% of their free RoF).

The .50 M3 managed around 1,200 rpm but that saw little if any use in WW2.

A couple of articles on my website concerning the performance of aircraft guns in WW2:
CANNON OR MACHINE GUN
WORLD WAR 2 FIGHTER GUN EFFECTIVENESS

Tony Williams: Military gun and ammunition website and discussion forum
Tony Williams is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Corsair vs Zero Cougar Aviation 261 03-20-2008 05:53 PM
P-47N Thunderbolt vs. F4U-4 Corsair - Which was superior? DAVIDICUS Aviation 239 09-04-2007 03:17 AM
UFOs : REAL or BS? RonRyan85 OFF-Topic / Misc. 26 08-15-2006 02:22 PM
The Real Threat; Not Communism, but Big Gov't and the Left Harvard Politics 227 05-22-2006 09:26 PM
Which is better: P-47 or Fw-190? mosquitoman Aviation 236 06-16-2005 05:24 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
   

AVIATION TOP 100 - www.avitop.com Avitop.com


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84