 | Worst aircraft of WW2? (Continued)| Aviation Discuss Worst aircraft of WW2? (Continued) in the World War II - Aviation forums; Originally Posted by Lightning Guy
IClaiming that the TBD was one of the best torpedo bombers in the world at ... |
|
01-27-2005, 11:15 AM
|
#16 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Stockport
Posts: 162
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by Lightning Guy IClaiming that the TBD was one of the best torpedo bombers in the world at the time isn't saying much. What else was in the running? The Stingbag, the Abalcore, the B5N. That's about it.
And the TBD was that bad. Consider that clean it's top speed was a mere 206mph. When carrying a torp it was hard pressed to make 125mph. | I'm not arguing that the TBD was a great aircraft, I'm just saying that it doesn't belong in the 'worst aircraft of WW2 thread'
ps, even though its top speed was only around 125mph with a torpedo, it would've still had to slow down to less than 100 mph on its torpedo run, any faster, and the torpedo would break-up on hitting the water 
__________________ If in doubt........Panic!!!!!!! |
| |
01-27-2005, 11:19 AM
|
#17 | | Konfused with a 'K'
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Turin, Italy
Posts: 20,412
Country: | Quote: |
Originally Posted by Adolf Galland That is true, and if ur talking about the worst aircraft, it should be trainer aircrafts since that basically sucks in everything | Why...trainer aircraft arent supposed to be good in combat, theyre supposed to train pilots/gunners/navigators/radio operators, and thats what they did...
__________________ with my one last gaping breath id apologise for bleeding on your shirt... |
| |
01-27-2005, 11:21 AM
|
#18 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Stockport
Posts: 162
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by mosquitoman That's why I think the Botha is the worst, it never even saw combat | I have a nice quote on the Botha
An RAF test pilot in his report after flying it, wrote,
" The cockpit is almost impossible to get into, it should be made impossible" 
__________________ If in doubt........Panic!!!!!!! |
| |
01-27-2005, 11:25 AM
|
#19 | | Konfused with a 'K'
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Turin, Italy
Posts: 20,412
Country: | Haha 
__________________ with my one last gaping breath id apologise for bleeding on your shirt... |
| |
01-27-2005, 12:20 PM
|
#20 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Hattiesburg,Ms
Posts: 189
Country: | Quote: |
Originally Posted by redcoat Quote: |
Originally Posted by Lightning Guy What did the TBD do? Serve as fodder for the Zero's so the SBD's could blast the Japanese? Is that a compliment? | Actually the TBD wasn't as bad as it is made out to be. In fact it was better than most torpedo bombers of the era.
It just gets a bad rep due to Midway ,when in fact any torpedo bomber attacking, against the odds they were facing, would have suffered the same fate. | It was a bit underarmed and underpowered though...
__________________ The Spits got nothing on this... |
| |
01-27-2005, 12:48 PM
|
#21 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,512
| And the fact that 37 out of 41 were lost in one battle has got to say something about the quality of an aircraft. Every aviation historian I've read comment on the TBD comments that it was obsolete before the war started.
The thing about the speed means the aircraft takes longer to reach the target area. By the time the TBD reaches a point 250 miles away its target may have moved 60 miles! And even then with a top speed of 125mph it is extremely vulnerable even before it starts its run.
__________________ |
| |
01-27-2005, 02:48 PM
|
#22 | | Master of Ewes
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 19,959
Country: | mind you that's what they said about the stringbag............
__________________ 
"Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy." |
| |
01-27-2005, 02:54 PM
|
#23 | | Konfused with a 'K'
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Turin, Italy
Posts: 20,412
Country: | And didnt it prove everyone wrong...this can only prove one thing...Brits are luckier than Yanks 
__________________ with my one last gaping breath id apologise for bleeding on your shirt... |
| |
01-27-2005, 03:10 PM
|
#24 | | Master of Ewes
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 19,959
Country: | what the stringbag did was not down to luck........
__________________ 
"Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy." |
| |
01-27-2005, 03:27 PM
|
#25 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Stockport
Posts: 162
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by Lightning Guy And the fact that 37 out of 41 were lost in one battle has got to say something about the quality of an aircraft. Every aviation historian I've read comment on the TBD comments that it was obsolete before the war started.
| and I'm not disagreeing with them
But there were lots of obsolete aircraft which flew in WW2.
The point which I keep attempting to explain is,
the TBD was indeed obsolete, but it wasn't bad enough to be put in the 'worst aircraft of WW2' thread
__________________ If in doubt........Panic!!!!!!! |
| |
01-27-2005, 04:06 PM
|
#26 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: New York City
Posts: 105
| the reason y the traniers are s'pose 2 be the worst aircraft cuz if they are good, y not use them in combat? so the old junks are use 4 traniers(some of them are light planes w/ weak engines) |
| |
01-27-2005, 04:09 PM
|
#27 | | Your ad here. ;)
Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Moorpark, CA
Posts: 11,864
Country: | But some aircraft are specifically designed as trainers and were never designed for combat. That does not make them bad airplanes. The North American AT-6 is a great example. Over 20,000 of them were made and today, over 1,000 of them are still flying! They are durable and great to fly.
__________________ http://www.vg-photo.com Wherever their bones may lie, the courage of heroes is consecrated in the hearts and engraved in the history of the free. Lt Col Honner DSO MC, 39th Commander speaking of the dead from the battle of Kokoda. |
| |
01-27-2005, 04:23 PM
|
#28 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: New York City
Posts: 105
| i also got a really bad plane to show u and here it is:
Boeing P-26 Peashooter
(s'pose to be a)fighter, 500HP, Range 300miles w/ fuel tanks, max speed 233mph, ceilig 27400, remained in sencond line duty in WWII.
picture:
<a href"http://www.daveswarbirds.com/usplanes/photos/p-26.jpg">http://www.daveswarbirds.com/usplanes/photos/p-26.jpg</a> |
| |
01-27-2005, 04:24 PM
|
#29 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: New York City
Posts: 105
| evanglider:
wut i mean by that is the ones that are retired from front line duty cuz it prove to be sitting ducks for the enemy. |
| |
01-27-2005, 04:51 PM
|
#30 | | Your ad here. ;)
Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Moorpark, CA
Posts: 11,864
Country: | Okay, thanks for the clarification.
The P-26 was the very first all metal skinned fighter the Americans had, but was very obsolete by the time the war broke out. It first flew in March of 1932 and for it's day, was faster and could outclimb the biplanes. It was one of the first allied aircraft to shoot down a Japanese plane though.
Edit:
Most of those P-26s that had been stationed in the Philippines had been sold to the government of the Philippines by the time of the Japanese attack. The Philippine government acquired 12 P-26As beginning in July of 1941. Some of these P-26s were serving with the 6th Pursuit Squadron of the Philippine Army Air Force based at Batangas Field at the time of the Japanese attack. Despite their total obsolescence, the Filipino P-26s succeeded in scoring some victories against the Mitsubishi A6M Zero during the first few days of the Japanese attack. One of the Philippine P-26s is credited with shooting down the first Japanese plane destroyed during the early attacks on the islands. The best-known action took place on December 12, 1942, then a group of six Philippine P-26s led by Capt. Jesus Villamor shot one bomber and two Zeros with the loss of three P-26s. However, the few P-26s operated by the Philippine Army Air Force were quickly overwhelmed by the onslaught of the Japanese Zero fighters, and the surviving P-26s were destroyed on the ground by Filipinos to prevent them from falling into enemy hands. http://home.att.net/~jbaugher1/p26_6.html
It is amazing, or truly lucky that they managed to get Zeroes with the P-26, but they did.
__________________ http://www.vg-photo.com Wherever their bones may lie, the courage of heroes is consecrated in the hearts and engraved in the history of the free. Lt Col Honner DSO MC, 39th Commander speaking of the dead from the battle of Kokoda. |
| | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:32 PM. |  | |