Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums
 



Go Back   Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums > World War II - Aviation > Aviation

Aviation Discussion on the aircraft of WWII.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-25-2009, 12:47 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Lucky13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: A Swede living in Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 15,140
WWII photo reconnaissance aircraft...?

Can't remember ever see a thread about those eyes in the sky... Which would you say was the best photo reconnaissance aircraft of WWII?
__________________

JAN "Felicis Tredecim"
"I´m going back to the front to relax"
"THE BLACK CATS FLIES TONIGHT"
"Find your enemy and shoot him down - everything else is unimportant!"
"When you're out of F-8's... You're out of fighters!"

Lucky13 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2009, 01:07 PM   #2
Der Crewchief
 
DerAdlerIstGelandet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 33,152
I think the ultimate photo recon aircraft of WW2 has to be the Arado Ar 234B-1.

)
__________________


fly boy:"isnt that the first jet bomber becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"[/I]
DerAdlerIstGelandet is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2009, 02:09 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
imalko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Vojvodina, Serbia
Posts: 1,306
I think that for the Eastern front it would have to be Focke Wulf Fw 189. I believe the Soviets had good opinion of this aircraft too. I remember to have read somewhere (think it was in book "Back Cross Red Star") that Soviet fighter pilots considered Fw 189 as a hard plane to shot down and Red Army soldiers knew that when Fw 189 appeared on the sky they could expect an air raid or artillery bombardment.

Of course, there were also photo recon versions of fighter aircrafts like Spitfire or Bf 109, just to name the few...
__________________

"Find your enemy and shoot him down - everything else is unimportant."

Last edited by imalko; 05-25-2009 at 02:14 PM.
imalko is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2009, 02:23 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 914
I think the Ar-234 as well, followed by the Spitfire PR.XI, which recoded a higher speed than was ever recorded in an Ar 234, albeit travelling downwards
__________________
BlondeValkyrie - Bugger off and host your OWN pictures you thieving twat
Waynos is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2009, 03:49 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: London
Posts: 3,655
Sounds like a stuck record I know but its the Spitfire.
Glider is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2009, 05:14 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
syscom3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 10,280
The F5 version of the P38. Its big fat nose meant lots of room for cameras.

And most importantly, it had the range to go where the Spitfire could never get to.

And it had a decent enough speed to keep pursing aircraft at bay.
__________________
"Pilot to copilot..... what are those mountain goats doing up here in the clouds?"
syscom3 is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2009, 05:48 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
Juha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Helsinki
Posts: 1,359
LR work Mossie PR.34 or PR IX
Medium range Arado Ar 234
TacRec NA F6 or Spitfire FR.XIV

Juha

Lucky, there is at least one tread on PR a/c, see http://www.ww2aircraft.net/forum/avi...sie-17225.html (mid war recon aircraft -Ki-46 Dinah or Mossie?)

Last edited by Juha; 05-25-2009 at 06:06 PM. Reason: Added the link and changed the older Mossie variant
Juha is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2009, 06:22 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: London
Posts: 3,655
Quote:
Originally Posted by syscom3 View Post
The F5 version of the P38. Its big fat nose meant lots of room for cameras.

And most importantly, it had the range to go where the Spitfire could never get to.

And it had a decent enough speed to keep pursing aircraft at bay.
Its worth remembering that the 8th Airforce used Spitfire XI as well as the F5 and that they asked for the Spit XI because they could do what the F5 couldn't. I don't know the exact range figures but I do know that the Spitfire was able to operate over Germany by day and night so the range was more than good enough.
Glider is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2009, 06:30 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
syscom3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 10,280
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glider View Post
Its worth remembering that the 8th Airforce used Spitfire XI as well as the F5 and that they asked for the Spit XI because they could do what the F5 couldn't. I don't know the exact range figures but I do know that the Spitfire was able to operate over Germany by day and night so the range was more than good enough.
And the F5 gave you coverage all the way into eastern Poland.

And the 8th AF always wanted P38's because they could do more things that the Spits couldnt do.

And of course in the PTO, the Spitfire simply didnt have the range to do anything.
__________________
"Pilot to copilot..... what are those mountain goats doing up here in the clouds?"
syscom3 is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2009, 06:42 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
Thorlifter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 4,345
My vote would go for the Mosquito.
__________________
Thorlifter is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2009, 06:52 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Brownhills, W. Mids, UK
Posts: 1,189
Send a message via AIM to BombTaxi
With Thor on the Mossies as the best recon machine in the ETO - so good even the USAAF used it On the Eastern Front, the superior type was definitely the Fw189. I'm not sure what I would go for in the PTO, probably the PBY, and definitely the Liberator for the North Atlantic, as it finally closed the infamous 'Air Gap'.
__________________
Good generals think about tactics. Great generals think about logistics.

"If freedom is to be saved and enlarged, poverty must be ended. There is no other solution." - Nye Bevan

"Any man's death diminishes me, because I am involved in mankind;
and therefore never send to ask for whom the bell tolls; it tolls for thee" - John Donne, Meditation XVII
BombTaxi is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2009, 07:02 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: niagara falls
Posts: 5,586
Quote:
Originally Posted by syscom3 View Post
And the F5 gave you coverage all the way into eastern Poland.

And the 8th AF always wanted P38's because they could do more things that the Spits couldnt do.

And of course in the PTO, the Spitfire simply didnt have the range to do anything.
The recce spit mkIV had a range of 2000 mile however I'd opt for the Lightning F5
pbfoot is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2009, 08:21 PM   #13
Senior Member
 
syscom3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 10,280
Quote:
Originally Posted by pbfoot View Post
The recce spit mkIV had a range of 2000 mile however I'd opt for the Lightning F5
2000 miles? You have information to back that up?
__________________
"Pilot to copilot..... what are those mountain goats doing up here in the clouds?"
syscom3 is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2009, 08:23 PM   #14
Senior Member
 
syscom3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 10,280
Quote:
Originally Posted by BombTaxi View Post
With Thor on the Mossies as the best recon machine in the ETO - so good even the USAAF used it On the Eastern Front, the superior type was definitely the Fw189. I'm not sure what I would go for in the PTO, probably the PBY, and definitely the Liberator for the North Atlantic, as it finally closed the infamous 'Air Gap'.
PBY? Every time they went on a recon mission and were found out by the Japanese, they ended up getting shot down or shoo'd away.

Same with the B24. Couldnt do deep recon without escort.

Now of course, there is a difference between maritime recon as opposed to continental recon.
__________________
"Pilot to copilot..... what are those mountain goats doing up here in the clouds?"
syscom3 is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2009, 08:30 PM   #15
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Brownhills, W. Mids, UK
Posts: 1,189
Send a message via AIM to BombTaxi
You have just answered your own criticism sys - there were no Axis fighters over the North Atlantic, so the Liberator was in it's element. While there is difference in maritime recon and overland recon, both roles are still recon. We could hair-split over what tasks constitute tactical recon, strategic recon, BDA, maritime patrol, etc etc, but all fall to a greater or lesser extent under the recon banner, IMHO. The basic aim is the same though - to locate the enemy, and by photographic means or otherwise, record his location and strength and then transmit the information back for processing and the tasking of other units as required by the threat.
__________________
Good generals think about tactics. Great generals think about logistics.

"If freedom is to be saved and enlarged, poverty must be ended. There is no other solution." - Nye Bevan

"Any man's death diminishes me, because I am involved in mankind;
and therefore never send to ask for whom the bell tolls; it tolls for thee" - John Donne, Meditation XVII
BombTaxi is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:31 PM.
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Ad Management plugin by RedTyger
Design by HTWoRKS


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118