 | you here what happended last night ?| Aviation Discuss you here what happended last night ? in the World War II - Aviation forums; There is always a risk of something sensitive getting out, and I think that was one of the concerns. But ... |
|
02-21-2008, 03:26 PM
|
#16 | | "Shooter"
Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Moorpark, CA
Posts: 12,834
Country: | There is always a risk of something sensitive getting out, and I think that was one of the concerns. But there was about 100 gallons, not pounds, of hydrazine on board, and that would cause some damage. Quote:
Hydrazine is highly toxic and dangerously unstable, especially in the anhydrous form. According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency:
Symptoms of acute (short-term) exposure to high levels of hydrazine may include irritation of the eyes, nose, and throat, dizziness, headache, nausea, pulmonary edema, seizures, coma in humans. Acute exposure can also damage the liver, kidneys, and central nervous system. The liquid is corrosive and may produce dermatitis from skin contact in humans and animals. Effects to the lungs, liver, spleen, and thyroid have been reported in animals chronically exposed to hydrazine via inhalation. Increased incidences of lung, nasal cavity, and liver tumors have been observed in rodents exposed to hydrazine.[17]
| Now imagine that coming down into an area of a country that we are not on good terms with, or maybe we are. It could be speculated that the satellite was deliberately aimed there. Likely? No, but that wouldn't stop propagandists and conspiracy nuts from coming up with something.
The are of contamination would be about 2 football fields. Landing in the middle of the desert somewhere would be no big deal, but what if it landed in the middle of say, downtown Los Angeles?
__________________ http://www.vg-photo.com Wherever their bones may lie, the courage of heroes is consecrated in the hearts and engraved in the history of the free. Lt Col Honner DSO MC, 39th Commander speaking of the dead from the battle of Kokoda. |
| |
02-21-2008, 03:27 PM
|
#17 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Canada
Posts: 124
Country: | agree with SOd stitch, figure it was agreat way to show that they can hit satellites while in space. |
| |
02-21-2008, 04:04 PM
|
#18 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Medford, MA
Posts: 109
Country: | Quote:
Originally Posted by SoD Stitch Moving on, how many people here (besides me) suspect there was more to this than the government let on? According to several experts, the actual hazard the satellite posed to humanity with it's 100 lbs. or so of hydrazine on-board was extremely small; even assuming it came down in a relatively populated area (highly unlikely to begin with), it would not have posed a serious health risk to anybody, unless it hit them on the head. My guess is the US Gov't wanted to show the world (especially China) in a very public way that we have the means of taking out any satellite of our choosing.
. |
As was said before its not 100lbs of hydrazine, its half a TON of hydrazine.
Anyways, people, stop believing the liberal media. Thats what they want you to think, in reality, both the Russians and the Chinese know that the US has had the ability to run ASAT missions since the introduction of the ASM-135 in 1984 (almost 15 years ago). In 1985 the ASM-135 was launched by an F-15 and competely destroyed the P78-1 Solwind sat, showing without a doubt that the US could easily take a sat out of its choosing a long time ago. |
| |
02-22-2008, 12:58 AM
|
#19 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Pine Mountain Lake, California
Posts: 802
Country: | Quote:
Originally Posted by evangilder There is always a risk of something sensitive getting out, and I think that was one of the concerns. But there was about 100 gallons, not pounds, of hydrazine on board, and that would cause some damage. | I stand corrected on my facts (or lack thereof!). Obviously, I misheard (or mis-remembered; more likely at my advanced age!) the "100 gallons" as "100 lbs."; my mistake . . . . but I still think there's more behind it than simply "interest for the public's safety". As I said, the chances of it actually coming down in a populated area were extremely remote to begin with. I guess we'll never know the truth . . . .
__________________ |
| |
02-22-2008, 01:23 AM
|
#20 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Escondido,Ca
Posts: 2,118
Country: | Quote:
Originally Posted by Evil_Merlin As was said before its not 100lbs of hydrazine, its half a TON of hydrazine.
Anyways, people, stop believing the liberal media. Thats what they want you to think, in reality, both the Russians and the Chinese know that the US has had the ability to run ASAT missions since the introduction of the ASM-135 in 1984 (almost 15 years ago). In 1985 the ASM-135 was launched by an F-15 and competely destroyed the P78-1 Solwind sat, showing without a doubt that the US could easily take a sat out of its choosing a long time ago. | Merlin you think like i do it was 24 years ago you old fart! 
__________________ Dont shoot him...... It will just make him angry. |
| |
02-22-2008, 01:24 AM
|
#21 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Medford, MA
Posts: 109
Country: | Oh damn it is almost 24 years ago. I guess I'm trying to block it out... I am getting old. |
| |
02-22-2008, 01:32 AM
|
#22 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Escondido,Ca
Posts: 2,118
Country: | I know, i had to think about it too frekin years 
__________________ Dont shoot him...... It will just make him angry. |
| |
02-22-2008, 03:12 AM
|
#23 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 391
Country: | Quote:
Originally Posted by DBII I'm surprised that Green Peace did not Muck it Up with a lawyer.
DBII | LOL!
Probably couldn't figure out how to float their kayaks into outer space!
Elvis |
| |
02-22-2008, 05:55 AM
|
#24 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 19
Country: | Quote:
Originally Posted by evangilder There is always a risk of something sensitive getting out, and I think that was one of the concerns. But there was about 100 gallons, not pounds, of hydrazine on board, and that would cause some damage.
Now imagine that coming down into an area of a country that we are not on good terms with, or maybe we are. It could be speculated that the satellite was deliberately aimed there. Likely? No, but that wouldn't stop propagandists and conspiracy nuts from coming up with something.
The are of contamination would be about 2 football fields. Landing in the middle of the desert somewhere would be no big deal, but what if it landed in the middle of say, downtown Los Angeles? |
yet those of us in the USAF get dumped on and they give less than a **** about us... in fact about 15-20 people in my unit alone this past year (including myself).
Didn't even get the rest of my shift off and ended up coughing for the next few days. |
| |
02-22-2008, 06:20 AM
|
#25 | | Der Crewchief
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 30,198
Country: | Quote:
Originally Posted by SoD Stitch Yes, I would guess it was quite the opposite; compared to the cold of the space surrounding it, it would seem the satellite was a relatively "warm" target, comparatively speaking. Even a "dead" satellite would radiate more heat than the empty space surrounding it. | Exactly I was going to explain the same thing to him.
__________________ US Army Blackhawk Crewchief 2000-2006 Classic ww2aircraft.net quotes: fly boy said: "isn't that the first jet bomber? becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles" "wait what ok who made the b-2 crash come on people that messed up its a b-2" "ah yes the mistel those things are so annoying is games and in real life" |
| |
02-22-2008, 07:59 AM
|
#26 | | "Shooter"
Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Moorpark, CA
Posts: 12,834
Country: | Quote:
Originally Posted by insomnia yet those of us in the USAF get dumped on and they give less than a **** about us... in fact about 15-20 people in my unit alone this past year (including myself).
Didn't even get the rest of my shift off and ended up coughing for the next few days. | Sadly, some things never change.
__________________ http://www.vg-photo.com Wherever their bones may lie, the courage of heroes is consecrated in the hearts and engraved in the history of the free. Lt Col Honner DSO MC, 39th Commander speaking of the dead from the battle of Kokoda. |
| |
02-25-2008, 11:22 AM
|
#27 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 343
Country: | Quote:
Originally Posted by DerAdlerIstGelandet Explain how the SAT is cold. | the sat was in orbit about may be 56miles above us |
| |
02-25-2008, 12:53 PM
|
#28 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Medford, MA
Posts: 109
Country: | Quote:
Originally Posted by fly boy the sat was in orbit about may be 56miles above us | It most assuredly doesn't mean it was cold, especially to a IR seeking warhead...
Cold to us humans? Sure. Cold to a warhead designed to track heat radiation? Not even close.
Mind you the SM-3 used more than IR guidance to get it's now confirmed kill. |
| |
02-25-2008, 09:04 PM
|
#29 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 2,238
Country: | I would expect that the Highly volitile (and quite flamable) hydrazine would be burned-up (or at least evaporated) along with the salellite on reentery.
A side note: Hydrazine Hydrate was a major component of C-Stoff fuel (the rest being methanol) used in the Me 163 along with T-Stoff (80% Hydrogen Peroxide) the T-stoff being more corrosive and harmful to contact and the C-stoff more toxic and volitile. (in terms of vaporization) |
| |
02-25-2008, 09:30 PM
|
#30 | | Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 77
Country: | No, it HAS to be a conspiracy.
There is no earthly (pun intended) reason that the US Government would take the precaution of letting 1000lbs of hydrazine in a pretty strong tank land on either the US or a foreign country.
Nope, they'd much rather take a chance, no matter how remote, that the thing and stuff would land harmlessly in either the water or the middle of nowhere (where the environmental damage would be significant as the casing ruptured going from mach 6 to 0 in a millisecond) than LA, Honolulu, or Sydney.
Jeez, some of the conspiracy nuts in the world just grate. News flash - BIG pieces of the Shuttle Columbia came down intact including, guess what? That's right, folks, fuel tanks for some of the OMS and manuevering thrusters.
Just a thought; if it were a test, why announce it? The Chinese that we'd want to know that we had the same capability to knock out satellites as did the PRC would know if we shot one down. Why risk the bad press in the event such a shot went amiss?
Jeez, go find Jimmy Hoffa or Amelia Earhart or the like. Let the facts on this one just be the facts............ |
| | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:31 AM. |  | |