 |
11-19-2005, 10:26 AM
|
#151 | | Minister of Whoopass
Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Long Island Native in Mississippi
Posts: 13,274
Country: | The late model Stuka, the ones left in service, served a very specific niche, and filled it quite nicely....
This vid clip is the last thing many, MANY Russian tankers ever heard...
__________________ "After That Second Kill, I Knew It Was Time To Get The Hell Outta There..."
-- Lt. William Northrop Case
To See My IL2 Sturmovik Video Tribute to My Grandfather, Click Here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HtzN5RuNNJk |
| |
11-19-2005, 11:17 AM
|
#152 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 8,444
| Les, I would agree with you on the niche role.
However, to be fair, for the years 1938-1940, it was a good airplane. After that, it had better fly when no enemy fighters were near by.
__________________ "Pilot to copilot..... what are those mountain goats doing up here in the clouds?" |
| |
11-19-2005, 12:20 PM
|
#153 | | Minister of Whoopass
Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Long Island Native in Mississippi
Posts: 13,274
Country: | Quote: |
However, to be fair, for the years 1938-1940, it was a good airplane. After that, it had better fly when no enemy fighters were near by.
| And I would agree 100% with that... Same thing could be said of the Il-2 Sturmovik, armour or no armour....
__________________ "After That Second Kill, I Knew It Was Time To Get The Hell Outta There..."
-- Lt. William Northrop Case
To See My IL2 Sturmovik Video Tribute to My Grandfather, Click Here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HtzN5RuNNJk |
| |
11-19-2005, 12:25 PM
|
#154 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 8,444
| The speed in which aviation evolved in WW2 for all sides, when you ask a rhetorical question "the best plane in what role", you need to specify what year.
__________________ "Pilot to copilot..... what are those mountain goats doing up here in the clouds?" |
| |
11-19-2005, 12:41 PM
|
#155 | | Master of Ewes
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 19,959
Country: | i thought we'd eliminated fighter-bombers from this thread on account of the fact they're not dedicated attack aircraft??
and nice video too les.......
__________________ 
"Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy." |
| |
11-19-2005, 09:04 PM
|
#156 | | Member
Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Long Island
Posts: 44
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by plan_D The Spitfire F.XII was also a neat little performer down low, to put it lightly. Surely there were some earlier Fw-190s in service during 1944-1945? A-4s, A-5s, A-6s or even a few A-9s? | The Mk.XII was quite the low-level monster....
My regards,
Navair |
| |
11-19-2005, 09:38 PM
|
#157 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 8,444
| Ok, Im going for broke and saying the A20 Havoc was the best all around attack plane of WW2.
The Stuka, as usefull it might have been, didnt come to compare to the A20.
The B25 and A26 were more in the genre of Medium bombers.
__________________ "Pilot to copilot..... what are those mountain goats doing up here in the clouds?" |
| |
11-20-2005, 03:20 AM
|
#158 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 12,061
Country: | Oh, NAVAIR, I like you again... but I'm still drunk from last night...but the XIIs....lovely...and, yes, they were monsters down low.
__________________ "When you go home tomorrow, don't expect anyone to know what you have been through. Even if they did know, most people probably wouldn't care anyway. Some of you may get the medals you deserve, many more of you will not. But remember this, all of you are now members of the front-line club, and that is the most exclusive club in the world." - Lt. Col. Matthew Maer CO 1st Battalion, the Princess of Wale's Royal Regiment. Camp Abu Naji, Oct. 2004  To those in that club. |
| |
11-20-2005, 08:59 AM
|
#159 | | Minister of Whoopass
Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Long Island Native in Mississippi
Posts: 13,274
Country: | Gentlemen, if I may make a reminder, this is about FAVORITE attack Aircraft, not BEST...
The Ju-87G is my FAVORITE attack aircraft.... It is NOT the best....
__________________ "After That Second Kill, I Knew It Was Time To Get The Hell Outta There..."
-- Lt. William Northrop Case
To See My IL2 Sturmovik Video Tribute to My Grandfather, Click Here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HtzN5RuNNJk |
| |
11-20-2005, 09:22 AM
|
#160 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Auburn,Alabama; USA
Posts: 1,934
Country: | In my opinion, the Ju-87 was a great attack aircraft. Even in the odds of being shot down by fighters, it was a Tank's worst enemy.
I voted for the B-25 Mitchelle for my favorite. Which could carry a 75mm that could tear up anything!
__________________ Its better to have an
Army of deer being led by a lion,
rather an Army of Lions being led by a deer... |
| |
11-20-2005, 09:32 AM
|
#161 | | Der Crewchief
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 30,198
Country: | My favorite attack plane would have to be the Hs-129. Yes it was very underpowered but you give it some DB's or some Jumos as someone else stated and she wuold have been awesome! I also really like the P-47 and the Fw-190F.
__________________ US Army Blackhawk Crewchief 2000-2006 Classic ww2aircraft.net quotes: fly boy said: "isn't that the first jet bomber? becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles" "wait what ok who made the b-2 crash come on people that messed up its a b-2" "ah yes the mistel those things are so annoying is games and in real life" |
| |
11-20-2005, 11:39 AM
|
#162 | | Konfused with a 'K'
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Turin, Italy
Posts: 20,412
Country: | Quote: |
Originally Posted by lesofprimus Gentlemen, if I may make a reminder, this is about FAVORITE attack Aircraft, not BEST...
The Ju-87G is my FAVORITE attack aircraft.... It is NOT the best.... | Exactly, if it was best I wouldnt have voted Hs-123...
__________________ with my one last gaping breath id apologise for bleeding on your shirt... |
| |
11-20-2005, 11:48 AM
|
#163 | | Der Crewchief
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 30,198
Country: | The Hs-123 was actually not a bad aircraft. It was just outclassed early in the war.
__________________ US Army Blackhawk Crewchief 2000-2006 Classic ww2aircraft.net quotes: fly boy said: "isn't that the first jet bomber? becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles" "wait what ok who made the b-2 crash come on people that messed up its a b-2" "ah yes the mistel those things are so annoying is games and in real life" |
| |
11-20-2005, 11:56 AM
|
#164 | | the old Sage
Join Date: May 2004 Location: Platonic Sphere
Posts: 9,481
Country: | just do not forget the 10th Pz staffeln of several SG's on the Ost front euipped with the Ju 87G-1 still operable and destroying Soviet armor, something the A-20 did not acheive or any other craft for that matter on a consistant basis. I still go back and refer the D-3 and D-5 varinats in the night skies giving Patton and the Allies so much teething troubles.
From one of Nick Beales articles .... |
| |
11-20-2005, 12:27 PM
|
#165 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 286
| The stuka was an impressive aircraft indeed, but i think id much rather fly the Hs-123 in the attack role. It's engine noise alone sounded like a machine gun supposedly, and was enough to scatter polish and russian soldiers. With its two nose mounted light machine guns, mg17s, and iron bombs, cluster bombs or 20mm underwing guns was very effective. As late as 1943 there were calls to reinstate production. The Hs-129, i love that sinister looking thing. With big cannon mounted optionally, 20mm and machine guns in the nose, and that sinister, evil looking armoured fueslage. With some more powerful engines it could have been a superb aircraft, DB-605 or -603, or a jumo-222 would have turned a good, underpowered aircraft into potentially the most capable aircraft out there for the job at the time. |
| | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:31 AM. |  | |