![]() |
| | #1 |
| Banned Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 339
| Adverse effects by using the wrong fuel? I know German planes were marked with B4 or C3 triangles so crews wouldn't use the false octane fuel on the specific planes. But then I also read of US trials of Japanese fighters using US fuel (which greatly enhanced performance). So what are the effects of using fuel of higher or lower octane for engines not designed for that number? |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 2,412
| As long as the engines are strong enough to handel the increased power obtained at higher boost settings (which high octane fuels allow) they should work fine once tuned to run on those fuels. (of course, boost settings would need to be increased to have a significant impact on performance) The Merlin III is a good example of this, while not designed to run on 100 octane fuel, it was found to be capable of this, allowing emergency boost to be increased to +12 psi (from +6.25 psi). Increasing power from 1,030 hp (6.25) to 1,160 hp (+9 psi) to ~1,300 hp (at +12 psi) |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 110
| If the engine (for example the BMW 801 which required C3) was run at a normal power level for C3 and B4 was in the tanks by chance; there would be detonation involved. SuperchargersOnline.com :: Detonation, Knock, and Pre-Ignition 101 A number of things could happen. In very little time, the top of the pistons would burn through most likely. Now if it was detuned to be able to run on B4 which would reduced power , then there would be no problems. Expect the power would be reduced significantly though. Running a higher rated fuel than an engine can use or set up to use would be no problem. It wouldn't make more power just from the fuel though. The engine could produce more power, but would have to be set-up to properly to make it. Higher boost pressures, advance in the timing, proper fuel mixture and a change to cooler plugs probably. Of course the said engine must be strong enough to handle the higher power. As for the Japanese aircraft and producing more power on US 100/150...well it's possible if this fuel was of higher octane than the Japanese variety. If someone could find the fuel tests of the Japanese fuel(s), then we may take a stab at the answer. Last edited by mad_max; 08-03-2008 at 02:44 AM. Reason: added link |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,113
| Another factor consider here is wether the engine is configured for natural or synthetic fuel, cause there's a difference. German engines didn't run very well on Allied fuel and lost power, as evident in the Allied testing of German a/c. Note: German C3 fuel equates to Allied 150 grade fuel, despite the 96 octane number.
__________________ ![]() It was like being pushed by an Angel! - Adolf Galland I'm an educated engineer, so I love being technical and appraising of great inventions. So if you think I am being biased about something: Tell me! Then you'll probably find out that I am not |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 2,412
| What about the C2 fuel? |
| | |
| | #6 | ||
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 110
| Soren, At times yes C3 was almost the same rating as 100/150, at other times was equal to 100/130. And those engines run just fine on non-synthetic fuels. It's a myth that they won't. I've talked to an engine rebuilder that has overhauled quite a few DB's and he sets them up to factory specs. He runs them at 100% power on 100LL wit no problems at all. Of course with 100LL they won't run them at WEP settings just as the Merlin's he rebuilds. My questions: Quote:
Quote:
| ||
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |