Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums

Spitfire engine problem

Engines Discuss Spitfire engine problem in the Technical forums; First Merlin engine Models use carburettors, late models use indirect fuel injection (german DB use direct fuel injction). Regarding to ...


Go Back   Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums > World War II - Aviation > Technical > Engines

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 03-26-2007, 08:06 AM   #16
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Montréal
Posts: 13
Country:
First Merlin engine Models use carburettors, late models use indirect fuel injection (german DB use direct fuel injction).
Regarding to the shape of wings, Spitfire has elliptic wing. This type of wings offer the minimum induced drag. This type of wing was used frequently a this time, see He 70, He111, Aichi D3A, etc..
The Spitfire use elliptic wing for other reasons, the designer want to keep the thickness to a minimum (Spitfire has a thickness of about 11%, while others aircrafts the same time use 15%). The reason for this thickness was high speed aerodynamic. The only way to accomodate 8 machine guns and keep the thickness without bulges was the elliptical wing planform. The big problem of this wing was time to manufacture, it require a lot of more manhours and cost more money.
ridato is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2007, 07:17 PM   #17
Senior Member
 
Sgt. Pappy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 173
Country:
the wing also would shudder at the tips near a stall. this would give the pilot early warning to correct his maneuvering.
__________________
"Never in the field of human conflict was so much owed by so many to so few..." - Winston Churchill
Sgt. Pappy is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2007, 07:25 PM   #18
Senior Member
 
Smokey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 533
Quote:
the wing also would shudder at the tips near a stall. this would give the pilot early warning to correct his maneuvering.
That's what fire ball was referring to

Quote:
Originally Posted by fire-ball View Post
also the rounded wings on the spitfire allowed the pilots to realize the how hard the pilots could take the plane unlike the me109 which pilots never new how hard to fly the sucker
__________________
Moose, according to one study, kill about 11 people a year. "They can kick in all four directions," warns a biologist with the Alaska Department of Fish and Game, "and move like Muhammad Ali."
Smokey is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2007, 04:31 PM   #19
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Montréal
Posts: 13
Country:
well, stall should start at wing root in a good designed aircraft to provide a good stall warning with aileron control, if stall start at wing tip you loose the aileron and the aircraft could enter to a spin. Usually wings have a washout of about -2 or -3 degrees, so the angle of attack in wingtip is lower than in the wing root. A big problem in aerodynamic elliptic wings is that lift is constant spanwise, so stall start all the wing, and if a washout is provided in the design of the wing, the wing is not aerodynamically elliptic.
ridato is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2007, 08:05 PM   #20
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 4
Country:
It had a float carb. reduce the G force, and the fuel rises. the mixture gets rich and the engine quits making noise. increase the G and the effect is not as bad as the change to lean was not as pronounced. the fix was to change the gasket over the fuel chamber to limit the fuel level. the real fix was to change the engine over to an american stromberg pressure injection unit.
Mike Nixon
mike nixon is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2007, 10:33 AM   #21
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 41
BTW, most WW Two fighter were restricted to 3-10 second inverted due to oil systenm limitations, not due to fuel system.
pasoleati is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
   

AVIATION TOP 100 - www.avitop.com Avitop.com


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86