![]() |
| |||||||
| Model Kit Reviews Was it a a good kit? Parts fit together well? Let everyone know your thoughts on the kit., good or bad. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #256 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Queensland
Posts: 4,765
| Yep that's the one. I might have to buy a second kit though, because I really want to make both Cleopatra III and the 120 (NEI) sqn RAAF example. Hmm what to do??
__________________ |
| | |
| | #257 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 7,678
| Damn..........buy three and do a third with after market decals
__________________ |
| | |
| | #258 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Queensland
Posts: 4,765
| Might just do that!! Love the new siggy mate
__________________ |
| | |
| | #259 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Adelaide Sth. Aust.
Posts: 14,850
| Now thats a great siggy Alex!!
__________________ ![]() |
| | |
| | #260 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 7,678
| Thanks guys
__________________ |
| | |
| | #261 |
| Senior Member | just recently bought a Bf-F-109E 3/4 "heinz bar"and a JU87G-1 stuka "tank buster' both are academy and both are 1/72nd scale
__________________ "Success is nothing more than taking advantage of an opportunity." - Hitman! - The Technical Guide for the Independent Contractor. |
| | |
| | #262 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Adelaide Sth. Aust.
Posts: 14,850
| Is that 109E the one with the Kettenkraftrad?
__________________ ![]() |
| | |
| | #263 |
| Senior Member | yup sure is wayne! have you built this kit or do you have it in the 'stash'?
__________________ "Success is nothing more than taking advantage of an opportunity." - Hitman! - The Technical Guide for the Independent Contractor. |
| | |
| | #264 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Adelaide Sth. Aust.
Posts: 14,850
| No I havent built it, nor do I have one, thought about getting one just for the kettenkraftrad...didn't really want the 109...
__________________ ![]() |
| | |
| | #265 |
| Senior Member | well if I don't feel like building it I now know someone who would do an excelent job of it!l
__________________ "Success is nothing more than taking advantage of an opportunity." - Hitman! - The Technical Guide for the Independent Contractor. |
| | |
| | #266 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Adelaide Sth. Aust.
Posts: 14,850
| Ah, thanks for your consideration SE !
__________________ ![]() |
| | |
| | #267 |
| Senior Member | anytime mate
__________________ "Success is nothing more than taking advantage of an opportunity." - Hitman! - The Technical Guide for the Independent Contractor. |
| | |
| | #268 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,851
| I had that kit - unfortunately it's not very accurate. To be blunt, I just kept the cockpit, seat, control column, and prop (and the Kettenkraftrad, of course) , and gave the rest to my neighbour with missing parts substitited from other kits. The ICM Bf 109Es are a much more accurate kit (on par with Tamiya in many ways) at the same price, if not cheaper. |
| | |
| | #269 |
| Siggy Master ![]() Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Poland
Posts: 16,017
| Unfortunately I have to agree with A4k.I have all these model kitsl and there are some serious mistakes made.To begin with, The bf 109E-3/4 has incorrect : the main landing gear wheels,the front part of its fuselage where MGs were mounted, the rear part of its fuselage behind the cockpit - the three first cross-sections there have wrong shape, the fin and rudder and some minor details. The Ju-87G-1.Pay your attention to the wings.Long time ago Academy offered the Ju-87 kit for the B-2/R-2 version and the G-1 model is based on this one.It is correct because the B-2/R-2 wing was used for D-3 version from which the G-1 was developped.The wingspan for the G-1 mark should be 19.17cm.Unfortunately, Academy modified the wing and added some milimeters to get wingspan of 20.83 cm what responds to G-2 wing.To recall the G-2 version was a development of Ju-87D-5 with longer wing.Tha's all on the wing matter. Now some mistakes.The main mistake is the engine covering ( simply the whole front part of the fuselage.Fortunately it is a detached segment)There is a lack of almost 4mm in its lenght.The main fuselage is a bit little base.But it is a common feature of all Ju87 1/72 scale miniatures.The second main mistake is a shape of the landing gear pants.And there are some minor mistakes but these are easy to correct.
__________________ ![]() Last edited by Wurger; 07-08-2008 at 10:37 AM. |
| | |
| | #270 |
| Senior Member | thanks for the info and heads up guys! The only place I can go in town to get kits mainly stocks academy kits but they also have some airfix models there as well. What do you guys think of the quality of the airfix kits?
__________________ "Success is nothing more than taking advantage of an opportunity." - Hitman! - The Technical Guide for the Independent Contractor. |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |