ADS NOT DISPLAYED TO REGISTERED USERS.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Air Force using B-52s to test synthetic aviation fuel

Modern Discuss Air Force using B-52s to test synthetic aviation fuel in the Other Eras forums; Air Force using B-52s to test synthetic aviation fuel This story appeared in the Antelope Valley Press on Sunday, September ...

  1. #1
    IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO FLYBOYJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Colorado, USA
    Posts
    20,670
    Country
    United States

    Air Force using B-52s to test synthetic aviation fuel

    Air Force using B-52s to test synthetic aviation fuel
    This story appeared in the Antelope Valley Press on Sunday, September 10, 2006.
    By ALLISON GATLIN
    Valley Press Staff Writer



    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    EDWARDS AFB - Searching for a means of reducing dependence on foreign oil, the Air Force is testing a synthetic fuel for its aircraft.
    The fuel could be a replacement for the JP-8 aviation fuel currently in use.

    Already tested by the Air Force Research Laboratory and in ground tests using an aircraft engine unattached to an airplane, the fuel will be put to the test at Edwards Air Force Base this month.

    "Now what we're going to do is take the next step and fly this," said Col. Arnie Bunch, commander of the 412th Test Wing.

    The flight tests will use a B-52 on loan from Minot Air Force Base in North Dakota. Two of the bomber's eight engines will use the synthetic fuel, the remaining will use the regular JP-8 fuel.

    The B-52 was chosen for these tests because the fuel can be isolated in those two engines. If something should go wrong with the fuel, the aircraft can still land safely using the six remaining engines, Bunch said.

    "Our pilots routinely train to do six-engine approaches. It's not anything a B-52 pilot doesn't routinely fly," he said.

    The two engines that will use the synthetic fuel have not been modified, except to be outfitted with test instruments to measure performance, Bunch said.

    The nonpetroleum fuel is made using the Fischer-Tropsch process to convert coal, natural gas or other hydrocarbons. The process was first developed by German scientists in the 1920s as a means of compensating for that country's lack of oil supplies.

    South Africa has employed the process to manufacture aviation and diesel fuel for some 50 years, according to an Environmental Protection Agency fact sheet.
    For this test, the aviation fuel is made from natural gas. Oklahoma-based Syntroleum has provided 100,000 gallons of the aviation fuel for this flight test program, according to company officials.

    The company produces two forms of the synthetic fuel, diesel and aviation, at its Catoosa Demonstration Facility outside Tulsa, Okla.

    The diesel fuel has been used in demonstration projects for public transit in Tulsa, Washington and by the U.S. National Park Service, according to the company.



    This is the first flight test of the aviation fuel.

    Because manufacture of the fuel is still a demonstration project and not full-blown commercial production, the costs do not directly compare with those of petroleum-based fuels.

    "Our economic analysis has shown that we can produce our ultra-clean fuel and achieve acceptable returns at prices comparable to commercial diesel and jet fuel," said Gary Gamino, director of investor relations for Syntroleum.

    The Air Force plans to begin flight testing with a baseline flight using the newly instrumented engines to determine performance using regular aviation fuel.

    This baseline information will be used to compare performance of the synthetic fuel.

    "I want what a pilot does when he has this fuel and how the airplane responds is the same it is today," Bunch said.

    The first flight using the test fuel is scheduled for Sept. 19. Officials hope to complete the testing in two flights, but a third is possible, he said.

    The data collected during flight testing will determine how the fuel may be used and if engine modifications are necessary.

    "Now the expectation is performance will be the same and we won't have to modify anything," Bunch said.

    The goal is to determine how it may also be used in other areas, such as ground support equipment and other engines.

    "We're looking at what we could do for the entire Air Force fleet," he said.

    The Air Force uses more than 3 billion gallons of aviation fuel a year and pays $3.50 a gallon, according to researchers at the Air Force Research Laboratory.

  2. #2
    Pacific Historian syscom3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    12,124
    Great info.

    Looks like as China's and India's economies expand in the coming years, the west will leapfrog them (technology wise) using new fuels.
    "Pilot to copilot..... what are those mountain goats doing up here in the clouds?"

  3. #3
    World Travelling Doctor? Gnomey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Royal Deeside/Swansea, UK
    Posts
    29,090
    Country
    United Kingdom
    We are already in general leaps and bounds ahead of China in particular...

    Great info Joe, be interesting to see how it pans out.


    "Success is not Final, Failure is not Fatal, it is the Courage to Continue that Counts"
    Sir Winston Churchill

    "To him the People of the World Largely owe the Freedom and Liberties they Enjoy Today"
    Enscription on Hugh Dowding's (AOC Fighter Command 1936-40) statue in London


    My Photo Collections on Flickr

  4. #4
    Senior Member the lancaster kicks ass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    19,986
    Country
    United Kingdom
    i can see how this may cut costs as intended but, although i realise it wasn't intended to, it doesn't help any sort of problems of running out of fossil fuels, they don't half make a big deal of a 6 engined approach, most pilots would nothing more than having 6 engines .........

    "Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy."

  5. #5
    IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO FLYBOYJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Colorado, USA
    Posts
    20,670
    Country
    United States
    Quote Originally Posted by Gnomey
    We are already in general leaps and bounds ahead of China in particular...

    Great info Joe, be interesting to see how it pans out.
    Agree and thanks!!
    Quote Originally Posted by syscom3
    Great info.

    Looks like as China's and India's economies expand in the coming years, the west will leapfrog them (technology wise) using new fuels.
    Let's hope so..

    Quote Originally Posted by the lancaster kicks ***
    i can see how this may cut costs as intended but, although i realise it wasn't intended to, it doesn't help any sort of problems of running out of fossil fuels, they don't half make a big deal of a 6 engined approach, most pilots would nothing more than having 6 engines .........
    Yep!!!

  6. #6
    Senior Member davparlr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    2,550
    Country
    United States
    This reminds me of a mission I flew into Langly AFB back in the early 70s in a C-141. Three Phds from Langly wanted a tour of my plane which I accomodated. They then asked me how I would like to fly it with liquid hydrogen. I said that, since we were already flying with liquid oxygen, a much more dangerous liquid, it didn't bother me at all. They said they were doing a study on using a C-141 as a test bed for liquid hydrogen propulsion. They said they would have to add two underwing tanks nine feet in diameter and sixty feet long! I guess they figured it was too much work, or wouldn't work, because it was never tried.

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. French fighter aircrft
    By carpenoctem1689 in forum Aviation
    Replies: 73
    Last Post: 10-12-2011, 09:26 AM
  2. Your top 10 modern fighters
    By Chris_G in forum Modern
    Replies: 252
    Last Post: 06-20-2008, 04:23 PM
  3. Air War's Greatest Aces...
    By lesofprimus in forum Stories
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 10-09-2006, 01:45 PM
  4. aircraft museums
    By gordon ingham in forum Aircraft Requests
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 05-31-2006, 05:25 AM
  5. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-28-2006, 10:53 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88