Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums

China's new fighter

Modern Discuss China's new fighter in the Other Eras forums; Impressive looking. how good could the avionics be? China's Fighters - Chengdu J-10...


Go Back   Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums > Other Eras > Modern

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 01-03-2007, 12:23 AM   #1
Senior Member
 
comiso90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 2,385
Country:
China's new fighter

Impressive looking. how good could the avionics be?

China's Fighters - Chengdu J-10
comiso90 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2007, 04:22 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: London
Posts: 2,826
Who knows. It depends to a large degree on what the Russians are willing to sell to China who it should be remembered are a potential threat. Are they willing to sell the top line equipment or an export version.

In both cases they would be behind the latest western aircraft and if the 'export' version is sold then the gap could be significant.

The J10 is a considerable improvement on the Mig21 designs and it will be cheap to buy so I can see it selling well to smaller countries replacing say F5's and Mig 21 aircraft.

I would as a potential purchaser be worried about reliability, spares and general support. China's track record is not impressive in this area. I would also be worried about the weight of the aircraft which seems heavy compared to its power.
Glider is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2007, 03:06 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Aggie08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,013
Country:
Send a message via AIM to Aggie08
I saw this just the other day and was pretty impressed. If I had to guess I'd say it definitely took some design cues from the new Eurofighter, but seeing as China has most of it's experience license-building MiGs, I wouldn't imagine it has the latest and greatest technologies aboard.
__________________
"I had ten rockets on board, and as I wasn't particularly fond of head-on attacks, I salvoed the whole lot at him. The rockets didn't hit him but but they must have scared the bejesus out of him, for he did a steep turn to starboard... I let him have the full blast, all eight fifty-calibers. I had never seen an aircraft completely disintegrate in the air the way this Me-110 did..."
Bill Dunn, 406th Fighter Group



Matt
Aggie08 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2007, 03:24 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: London
Posts: 2,826
As a blatent guess I would suggest that Isreal gave some support in the design. Isreal has helped China a number of times with military equipment and it does remind me of the Lavi which was an Isreali prototype that never made it to production.
The similarities are striking and would put it in the F16 category re capability.

Isreal spent a lot of money developing the Lavi and I don't doubt that China would be prepared to pay a heavy price to make such a leap from Mig 21 to F16 technology.
Glider is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2007, 03:18 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Aggie08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,013
Country:
Send a message via AIM to Aggie08
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/aircraft...vi/lavi_07.jpg

Good call Glider, I'd be inclined to agree with you.
__________________
"I had ten rockets on board, and as I wasn't particularly fond of head-on attacks, I salvoed the whole lot at him. The rockets didn't hit him but but they must have scared the bejesus out of him, for he did a steep turn to starboard... I let him have the full blast, all eight fifty-calibers. I had never seen an aircraft completely disintegrate in the air the way this Me-110 did..."
Bill Dunn, 406th Fighter Group



Matt
Aggie08 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2007, 03:38 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
pbfoot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NIAGARA
Posts: 4,601
Country:
I think you american guys would be upset that the Israelis recieved $1.3 billion of US funding for the Lavi and now toss the beast to a possible foe
ISN Security Watch - Israeli fighter allegedly reborn in China
__________________
pbfoot is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2007, 04:56 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: London
Posts: 2,826
Looks like my guess was closer than I thought. The ramifications could be huge.
If Israel also gave the Chinese the electronics to go with the design, then you are looking at a capable aircraft equal I would guess to the F16C which is a pretty effective aircraft.

Taking it a step further, would the USA trust Israel with the F22, I wouldn't.

That in turn puts Israel at risk. If the Arab states buy the Typhoon which Saudi is close to ordering, then for the first time Israel faces the Arab countries who have aircraft better than their own.

I agree this is a future scenario but one that is by no means impossible.
Glider is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2007, 05:31 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
mkloby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Jacksonville, NC
Posts: 3,224
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glider View Post
Looks like my guess was closer than I thought. The ramifications could be huge.
If Israel also gave the Chinese the electronics to go with the design, then you are looking at a capable aircraft equal I would guess to the F16C which is a pretty effective aircraft.

Taking it a step further, would the USA trust Israel with the F22, I wouldn't.

That in turn puts Israel at risk. If the Arab states buy the Typhoon which Saudi is close to ordering, then for the first time Israel faces the Arab countries who have aircraft better than their own.

I agree this is a future scenario but one that is by no means impossible.
Good point - but even if outclassed by equipment, training and tactics will make the difference. Typhoons can be dispatched, just as any other A/C can be.
__________________
If the Army and the Navy ever look on heaven's scenes, they will find the streets are guarded by United States Marines
mkloby is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2007, 05:54 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: London
Posts: 2,826
True certainly, but the IAF has basically faced the EAF and the SAF when they were flying under Russian methodology, plus better equipment.
These days the failings of the Russian approach are well known and the EAF has trained with the USA a number of times, as have the Saudi Air Force.

I am not saying that they are the equal of the IAF, but any reduction in the advantage of the IAF over its possible opponents has got to be bad news for Israel.

I would certainly think long and hard before selling Isreal such a sensitive piece of equipment as an F22, even a watered down version.
Glider is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2007, 06:00 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
mkloby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Jacksonville, NC
Posts: 3,224
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glider View Post
True certainly, but the IAF has basically faced the EAF and the SAF when they were flying under Russian methodology, plus better equipment.
These days the failings of the Russian approach are well known and the EAF has trained with the USA a number of times, as have the Saudi Air Force.

I am not saying that they are the equal of the IAF, but any reduction in the advantage of the IAF over its possible opponents has got to be bad news for Israel.

I would certainly think long and hard before selling Isreal such a sensitive piece of equipment as an F22, even a watered down version.
I agree.
__________________
If the Army and the Navy ever look on heaven's scenes, they will find the streets are guarded by United States Marines
mkloby is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2007, 06:10 AM   #11
World Traveler
 
Gnomey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Royal Deeside/St Andrews, Scotland, UK
Posts: 11,569
Country:
Send a message via AIM to Gnomey Send a message via MSN to Gnomey
I do too, I wouldn't trust the Israeli's with such an important piece of equipment. On the J-10, I also agree with Glider which would make it about the same as the F-16C (perhaps a bit better/worse). In this case the USA (and other NATO countries) still have better aircraft from after the F-16 era such as the F-22, the Eurofighter, updated F-16's and perhaps also the F-15 and F/A-18.
__________________


"Success is not Final, Failure is not Fatal, it is the Courage to Continue that Counts"
Sir Winston Churchill

"To him the People of the World Largely owe the Freedom and Liberties they Enjoy Today"
Enscription on Hugh Dowding's (AOC Fighter Command 1936-40) statue in London


Moderator WW2 Talk: A WW2 Discussion Forum

My Photo Collections on Flickr
Gnomey is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2007, 01:46 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
Aggie08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,013
Country:
Send a message via AIM to Aggie08
I don't think that the U.S. will sell the f-22 for a number of years. I wouldn't be too keen on giving up an aircraft that achieved a 104-0 kill ratio against other American aircraft (F-18s I think) during air exercises in Alaska. The technology is too valuable.

The Israelis have a strong air force and I don't think they will be put in too much trouble if Arab nations aquire the new Typhoon. Any disadvantage in hardware would be significantly lessened by the quality of the IDF pilots.
__________________
"I had ten rockets on board, and as I wasn't particularly fond of head-on attacks, I salvoed the whole lot at him. The rockets didn't hit him but but they must have scared the bejesus out of him, for he did a steep turn to starboard... I let him have the full blast, all eight fifty-calibers. I had never seen an aircraft completely disintegrate in the air the way this Me-110 did..."
Bill Dunn, 406th Fighter Group



Matt
Aggie08 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2007, 06:40 PM   #13
aka Dickcheese
 
Matt308's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Washington State
Posts: 10,468
Country:
The emphasis nowadays is not on airframe capability, but rather on weapons, radar and systems management integration. Isreal can feasibly keep up in this arena without upgrading to stealth airframes like the F-22.

And that is what should worry the US.
__________________

"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if
they made a difference in the world. But, the [U.S.]
Marines don't have that problem."
-- Ronald Reagan

Master of Duplicate Posts
Matt308 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2007, 05:40 PM   #14
Senior Member
 
comiso90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 2,385
Country:
For years we've heard that one of the most tangible and useful benefits of our (American) space program has been that the R&D has fueled and accelerated technology in other sectors, both military and civilian. It will be interesting to see how The Chinese Space program influences their advancements in technology.
Better manufacturing techniques? More advanced avionics? Quality control with very high tolerances? Metallurgy? Technology feeds technology and China is making strides away from their agrarian and manufacturing persona.
What Teflon and Velcro will they produce?
comiso90 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2007, 12:45 PM   #15
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 98
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by comiso90 View Post
Impressive looking. how good could the avionics be?

China's Fighters - Chengdu J-10
What is a China version of Eurofighter Typhoon

Bullo Loris
__________________
Bullo Loris is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
   

AVIATION TOP 100 - www.avitop.com Avitop.com


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92