ADS NOT DISPLAYED TO REGISTERED USERS.

View Poll Results: F-117 retirement: mistake or correct decision?

Voters
11. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    7 63.64%
  • No

    4 36.36%
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 46

F-117 retirement: mistake or correct decision?

Modern Discuss F-117 retirement: mistake or correct decision? in the Other Eras forums; Can the F-22 really replace the F-117? Was it really designed to? Is using the B-2 as a replacement really ...

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    729
    Country
    United States

    F-117 retirement: mistake or correct decision?

    Can the F-22 really replace the F-117? Was it really designed to?
    Is using the B-2 as a replacement really appropriate? (Sort of like replacing the F-111 with the B-52.)


  2. #2
    "Shooter" evangilder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Moorpark, CA
    Posts
    18,847
    Country
    United States
    The F-22 was not designed to replace the F-117. The F-117, despite the "F" designation was never a fighter. It was a strike attack aircraft. It didn't carry air-to-air missiles or guns and was subsonic. Realistically, it was an aircraft with a specialized mission, to get in undetected, strike, and get out. It did it well, but that is about all that airplane would do.

    The F-22 was designed to be an air superiority fighter with all the latest technology.

    I don't know where you are going with the B-2. The B-52 did not replace the F-111. More like the B-1 replaced the F-111, but only sort of.


    > I Support Doug Gilliss <

    For once you have tasted flight you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skywards, for there you have been and there you will long to return. Leonardo Da Vinci

  3. #3
    Pacific Historian syscom3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    12,114
    It was 1970's technology that became "dated".
    "Pilot to copilot..... what are those mountain goats doing up here in the clouds?"

  4. #4
    "Shooter" evangilder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Moorpark, CA
    Posts
    18,847
    Country
    United States
    Yep, and the advent of the F-22 and F-35 led to the 117's demise. Why have a stealth ground attack airplane that can do nothing else when you can have newer aircraft with stealth technology that can perform multiple roles, including a stealthy strike aircraft.


    > I Support Doug Gilliss <

    For once you have tasted flight you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skywards, for there you have been and there you will long to return. Leonardo Da Vinci

  5. #5
    Senior Member razor1uk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Tamago no Chie, (B'ham, UK)
    Posts
    730
    Country
    United Kingdom
    Country II
    England
    Undecided - No Vote.

    As far as componant servicing & procurement costs, the old Nighthawk is so cheap and sustainable now; certain F16, F5, F18 & C130 (+ F15?) componants & sub-systems were/are used in the Nighthawk because of cheaper developement costs and it is/was easier to hide from 'extremist budgeteers' & 'congressional comitees'.

    Although its stealth rcs capability is like an osprey to a apartment buildings B52, newer rads systems & software, ground based multi inter-linked (hard networked) radars with advanced computer tech & software make it more visible.
    And also it has probably reached its structural and weapon hardware upgrade/developement limit.

    Borrowed software & system wise, it can still use some of the the latest developed componants systems from its contributing a/c (see my 1st serntence), where as the uber expensivelimited production/development project that isrealistically the F22 still has development growth potential in hardware, software, sytems and structure areas.

    The real worth of the F22 and the even more problematic & cheaper white elephant JSF (F-35 series, although the CTOL 'A'(?) version will end up the longest life version IMHO) are as industrytech/mech/etc R&D test/training/teaching subjects for the real 5th generation aircraft that might be operational around 2030+.

    The 117 could still be usefull in some situations, certain to cover the capability gaps between current a/c, the training of Raptors & development of Lightnings Too (punn intended)

    But this is all my opinion based upon my flawed knowledge.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    729
    Country
    United States
    It seems the US has a history of retiring useful systems before they are fully replaced, creating capability gaps, for political & economic reasons.
    With the F-111, F-117 and A-6 now retired, what has truly replaced them? What capability gaps have been created?
    Last edited by gjs238; 07-09-2010 at 08:29 AM.

  7. #7
    "Shooter" evangilder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Moorpark, CA
    Posts
    18,847
    Country
    United States
    The F-117 hasn't been completely replaced, however, missile technology and systems in the F-16 and F-15 Strike Eagle can get in to drop their ordinance also, just not with Stealth.

    The F-111 and A-6 were cold war weapons, designed for a much different enemy than we have today. We have multiple aircraft that can be used in an attack role without having to continue support for aging equipment. You need to compare the cost of the new systems versus maintenance and upgrade costs of older systems, including potential major overhauls for airframes and structural components that wear out.

    The F-117 was a neat airplane that did a very specific mission, and did it pretty well. But is the cost of maintaining a single mission aircraft worth sacrificing funds for other aircraft that can perform multiple missions?


    > I Support Doug Gilliss <

    For once you have tasted flight you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skywards, for there you have been and there you will long to return. Leonardo Da Vinci

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    729
    Country
    United States
    I remember similar reasoning for retiring the A-10.

  9. #9
    Glock Perfection Matt308's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Washington State
    Posts
    18,826
    Country
    United States
    The A-10s not retired. It's being upgraded to the C model.

    "Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if
    they made a difference in the world. But, the [U.S.]
    Marines don't have that problem."
    -- Ronald Reagan

    Master of Duplicate Posts

  10. #10
    IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO FLYBOYJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Colorado, USA
    Posts
    20,557
    Country
    United States
    The F-117 is being replaced by the F-35. it was 1st or even 1.5 generation stealth technology that worked well and served its purpose. Operating the aircraft was expensive and those dollars could be used for other programs like the F-22 and F-35 production and engineering sustainment. The B-2 was designed for an entirely different mission.

    The USAF has and will sell its soul to ensure the successful deployment of the F-22 and F-35. Mistakes were made on both programs but in the end I firmly believe they will be successful and will form the backbone of the USAF fighter/ strike contingency.
    Last edited by FLYBOYJ; 07-09-2010 at 11:40 PM.

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    729
    Country
    United States
    So in the meantime...what?

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    3,539
    Country
    United Kingdom
    Quote Originally Posted by gjs238 View Post
    I remember similar reasoning for retiring the A-10
    You have
    some funny ideas of what's replacing what and what's retiring
    The A-10 is not retired, won't be for a while, certainly not while Afghanistan is on-going.

    Only my opinion, but I see the A-10 being the next B-52 in terms of operational longevity.

  13. #13
    Senior Member Messy1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Ankeny, Iowa
    Posts
    2,651
    Country
    United States
    Since there are new platforms coming online or all ready online that can do the F-117's job as good, if not better, and also perform other duties, than yes. Retiring the F-117 is the right choice. Agree on the Warthog Colin! One of my favorite active planes!!!Mean and Green!

    Bryon O.




    "When you are at the end of your rope, tie a knot and hang on!" Franklin Roosevelt


  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1,286
    Country
    United Kingdom
    I don't think it was a mistake. Firstly 'stealth' is not the be all and end all, it can only be a part of the overall package. While the F-117 was the only option for stealth, it had a role. As it no longer is, then it doesn't, as in all other respects its performance and capability (in airframe terms) is mediocre at best.

    There is nothing the F-117 could do that the F-22 cannot do, faster and with a greater range and payload to boot, or that the F-35, 'Phantom Ray' etc will not do in the near future.

    gjs 238, so in the meantime, if a LO platform is required for a sensitive mission the F-22 is already in service, in greater numbers than the F-117 ever was, of which only 59 were ever made.

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    729
    Country
    United States
    I never said the A-10 was retired.
    I was referring to the pressures the aircraft has faced over the years for cancellation and retirement.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Old Siggy Retirement Thread!
    By freebird in forum Signature/General Pics Upload
    Replies: 45
    Last Post: 07-11-2010, 10:49 AM
  2. Decision on Ghost Fleet
    By comiso90 in forum Modern
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 04-06-2010, 02:52 PM
  3. I Got a Job! Early Retirement.....Done!
    By ToughOmbre in forum OFF-Topic / Misc.
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 04-28-2008, 01:55 PM
  4. The Nuclear decision...what if?
    By Seawitch in forum WW2 General
    Replies: 94
    Last Post: 12-08-2007, 12:46 AM
  5. Freds Retirement
    By FLYBOYJ in forum OFF-Topic / Misc.
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 01-22-2006, 08:28 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86