 | F-35 Lightning II completes first flight| Modern Discuss F-35 Lightning II completes first flight in the Other Eras forums; Originally Posted by the lancaster kicks ass
it'll be interesting to see the F-22 against the F-35, ... |
|
01-09-2007, 06:18 PM
|
#31 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: London
Posts: 2,794
| Quote:
Originally Posted by the lancaster kicks ass it'll be interesting to see the F-22 against the F-35, have the Americans just wasted money on the F-22 perhaps? | Dare I say, or just buy Typhoons instead. |
| |
01-09-2007, 07:11 PM
|
#32 | | aka Dickcheese
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Washington State
Posts: 9,834
Country: | And settle for second best? Blasphemy.
Estimated costs for each with comparison to F-16
$30M F-16
$50M F-35
$58M Typhoon
__________________ 
"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if
they made a difference in the world. But, the [U.S.]
Marines don't have that problem."
-- Ronald Reagan Master of Duplicate Posts
Last edited by Matt308 : 01-09-2007 at 07:15 PM.
|
| |
01-10-2007, 02:36 AM
|
#33 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: London
Posts: 2,794
| Only $8m more per plane, bargin. How much do we reckon for the F22. |
| |
01-10-2007, 11:34 AM
|
#34 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Jacksonville, NC
Posts: 3,087
Country: | F-22 estimated 85 million per A/C, but the final cost is very dependent on the production run.
__________________ If the Army and the Navy ever look on heaven's scenes, they will find the streets are guarded by United States Marines |
| |
01-10-2007, 12:20 PM
|
#35 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 2,253
Country: | Now all we need is an adversary worthy of the F-22 or F-35.
I’m sure it’s too technologically sensitive to export for the next decade but I'd like to see China's reaction if Taiwan were allowed to purchased a handful. |
| |
01-10-2007, 12:57 PM
|
#36 | | Der Crewchief
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 29,423
Country: | The only think the Typhoon really lacks in is the stealth capability.
Typhoon is a great aircraft but the F-22 is still going to be the best in the air.
__________________ US Army Blackhawk Crewchief 2000-2006 Classic ww2aircraft.net quotes: fly boy said: "isn't that the first jet bomber? becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles" "wait what ok who made the b-2 crash come on people that messed up its a b-2" "ah yes the mistel those things are so annoying is games and in real life" |
| |
01-10-2007, 01:00 PM
|
#37 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Royal Deeside/St Andrews, Scotland, UK
Posts: 11,118
Country: | Quote:
Originally Posted by DerAdlerIstGelandet The only think the Typhoon really lacks in is the stealth capability.
Typhoon is a great aircraft but the F-22 is still going to be the best in the air. | Whilst I agree, I still think it would be interesting to see how the two were matched in a (albeit fake) combat scenario.
__________________ "Success is not Final, Failure is not Fatal, it is the Courage to Continue that Counts"
Sir Winston Churchill "To him the people of the world largely owe the Freedom and liberties they enjoy today"
Enscription on Hugh Dowding's (AOC Fighter Command 1936-40) statue in London Moderator WW2 Talk: A WW2 Discussion Forum |
| |
01-10-2007, 01:24 PM
|
#38 | | Der Crewchief
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 29,423
Country: | I think that would be interesting. The F-22 would come out on top because of its greater maneuverability due to the thrust vectoring.
__________________ US Army Blackhawk Crewchief 2000-2006 Classic ww2aircraft.net quotes: fly boy said: "isn't that the first jet bomber? becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles" "wait what ok who made the b-2 crash come on people that messed up its a b-2" "ah yes the mistel those things are so annoying is games and in real life" |
| |
01-10-2007, 03:15 PM
|
#39 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Royal Deeside/St Andrews, Scotland, UK
Posts: 11,118
Country: | Quote:
Originally Posted by DerAdlerIstGelandet I think that would be interesting. The F-22 would come out on top because of its greater maneuverability due to the thrust vectoring. | Yep, I think that would be the case as well although it would be a good fight.
__________________ "Success is not Final, Failure is not Fatal, it is the Courage to Continue that Counts"
Sir Winston Churchill "To him the people of the world largely owe the Freedom and liberties they enjoy today"
Enscription on Hugh Dowding's (AOC Fighter Command 1936-40) statue in London Moderator WW2 Talk: A WW2 Discussion Forum |
| |
01-10-2007, 04:55 PM
|
#40 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: London
Posts: 2,794
| Their is little doubt that its F22 before the Typhoon but when you consider how few F22's are likely to be built, the F35 vs Typhoon is likely to be the important matchup.
In a BVR scenario the F22 will I believe be unmatched for quite a time, the question is though, how often do the rules of engagement allow BVR. I do not know but I would be suprised if this was common. |
| |
01-10-2007, 07:35 PM
|
#41 | | aka Dickcheese
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Washington State
Posts: 9,834
Country: | You guys are focusing ENTIRELY to much upon the physical capabilities. The F-22's lethality is less connected to its flight performance and MUCH more connected to its stealth, weapon systems, guidance capability, detection capability and comm ability to share nav position state, intention, ability, targets and surveillance. This similar capability is inherent in the F-35. And for $8m for F-35, you bet I'd want it. With F-22 you got the best of both worlds.
I don't knock the Typhoon, but it is not the generation of either US aircraft. But I hope later Tranches (II and III) bring it up to speed.
__________________ 
"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if
they made a difference in the world. But, the [U.S.]
Marines don't have that problem."
-- Ronald Reagan Master of Duplicate Posts |
| |
01-10-2007, 10:12 PM
|
#42 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Jacksonville, NC
Posts: 3,087
Country: | Quote:
Originally Posted by Glider Their is little doubt that its F22 before the Typhoon but when you consider how few F22's are likely to be built, the F35 vs Typhoon is likely to be the important matchup.
In a BVR scenario the F22 will I believe be unmatched for quite a time, the question is though, how often do the rules of engagement allow BVR. I do not know but I would be suprised if this was common. | I believe the USAF will still be acquiring upwards of 200+ F-22s.
__________________ If the Army and the Navy ever look on heaven's scenes, they will find the streets are guarded by United States Marines |
| |
01-11-2007, 12:02 AM
|
#43 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: London
Posts: 2,794
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt308 You guys are focusing ENTIRELY to much upon the physical capabilities. The F-22's lethality is less connected to its flight performance and MUCH more connected to its stealth, weapon systems, guidance capability, detection capability and comm ability to share nav position state, intention, ability, targets and surveillance. This similar capability is inherent in the F-35. And for $8m for F-35, you bet I'd want it. With F-22 you got the best of both worlds.
I don't knock the Typhoon, but it is not the generation of either US aircraft. But I hope later Tranches (II and III) bring it up to speed. | Not quite and that is why I brought up the issue of BVR rules in the terms of engagement. Where BVR is allowed then the F22 is head and shoulders above the rest.
Earlier in the thread I mentioned that in excercises the F22 had scored 144 kills to zero, but its worth mentioning that 140 of those were in a BVR situation.
The Typhoon also has the weapon systems, guidance capability, detection capability and comm ability to share nav position state, intention, ability, targets and surveillance which will even things up to some degree. Indeed the Grippen has impressive abilities in this area so it isn't a new technology for Europe.
Time will tell as to how well the Typhoon and F35 square off against each other, because right now we don't know.
Personally I hope that the Typhoon is an advance over the F35 as the UK are buying both. If the Typhoon isn't an improvement then we have wasted a shedload of money on infrastructure costs alone to cater for both types of aircraft. |
| |
01-11-2007, 04:17 PM
|
#44 | | aka Dickcheese
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Washington State
Posts: 9,834
Country: | Interesting to read about those Alaska exercises that you are quoting the 144 kills from. Further reading indicates that the F-22s were assuming a top cover role that allowed them to guide and direct firing of F-15s, F-16s and F-18s against opposing forces. F-22 capabilities would allow information exchange to ensure that lock-ons were not overlapping to maximize ordinance on aircraft that could not even see the threat. The AESA radar, F-22 stealth, and performance is supposedly allowing a 150mi greater engagement range over F-15s and simulated opposition. The supercruise and high altitude performance allowed F-22s to freely roam at 65,000ft at mach 1.6 for BVR and to engage other targets at will by nosing over, accelerating and making use of IR missiles. Two kills were acquire in this manner and a third with guns. While the thrust to weight ratio is only about 1 versus 1.2 for F-15, Eagle drivers were complimenting the F-22 for its thrust vectoring ability and acceleration in full-burner. They further noted that F-22 maneuvering and performance is such that existing counter maneuvers need to be rethought to account for the F-22 unique performance. The conclusion being that while the F-22 was not developed with close in dogfighting capabilities as its primary strength, it is still quite a formidable foe...if you survive the BVR. As I recall. There was only 16 F-22s used in the whole exercise of which only 8 were engaged at any one time.
One of the most telling comments of those who witnessed the engagements was the "eery silence" of the F-22 attacks and coordation with other air assets. All this coordination and target parameter exchange occurring using machine-to-machine data link.
144 kills. I'd say that's not too bad. 
__________________ 
"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if
they made a difference in the world. But, the [U.S.]
Marines don't have that problem."
-- Ronald Reagan Master of Duplicate Posts
Last edited by Matt308 : 01-11-2007 at 04:22 PM.
|
| |
01-11-2007, 05:05 PM
|
#45 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: London
Posts: 2,794
| Thaks for the additional info its a lot more detailed than I had. There is no doubt that with the F22 and the F35, the USA have worthy replacements for the F15/F16 combination, that has served it so well over the last 25-30 years. |
| | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:10 PM. |  | |