 |
03-06-2006, 05:38 PM
|
#211 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Edmonton,Alberta
Posts: 2,260
Country: | Aircraft knocked down while others tried to prove were superior to the Lightning in the interceptor role:
F-101
F-106
F-104
F-14 ... Which was a good debate - lots of good information came from that....[/quote]
I wasnt talking about intercept role, you said that the Lightning was the greatest Fighter of the Cold war not interceptor, in which I replied the F-4 is the best all around fighter.
__________________ Hello me...meet the real me.
And my misfits way of life.
A dark black past is my
Most valued possession.
Hindsight is always 20-20,
But looking back its still a bit fuzzy.
Speak of mutually assured destruction?
Nice story...tell it to readers digest!!! |
| |
03-06-2006, 05:42 PM
|
#212 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Edmonton,Alberta
Posts: 2,260
Country: | Aircraft knocked down while others tried to prove were superior to the Lightning in the interceptor role:
F-101
F-106
F-104
F-14 ... Which was a good debate - lots of good information came from that....[/quote]
I wasnt talking about intercept role, SYS said that the Lightning was the greatest Fighter of the Cold war not interceptor, in which I replied the F-4 is the best all around fighter.
__________________ Hello me...meet the real me.
And my misfits way of life.
A dark black past is my
Most valued possession.
Hindsight is always 20-20,
But looking back its still a bit fuzzy.
Speak of mutually assured destruction?
Nice story...tell it to readers digest!!! |
| |
03-06-2006, 11:39 PM
|
#213 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 8,067
| I said the Lightning was the best cold war interceptor. In other roles, it wasnt so good.
__________________ "Pilot to copilot..... what are those mountain goats doing up here in the clouds?" |
| |
03-07-2006, 12:16 AM
|
#214 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 12,052
Country: | Yes, syscom clearly stated best Cold War interceptor.
__________________ "When you go home tomorrow, don't expect anyone to know what you have been through. Even if they did know, most people probably wouldn't care anyway. Some of you may get the medals you deserve, many more of you will not. But remember this, all of you are now members of the front-line club, and that is the most exclusive club in the world." - Lt. Col. Matthew Maer CO 1st Battalion, the Princess of Wale's Royal Regiment. Camp Abu Naji, Oct. 2004  To those in that club. |
| |
03-07-2006, 12:23 AM
|
#215 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Edmonton,Alberta
Posts: 2,260
Country: | and he did too, ****, ok never mind then.
__________________ Hello me...meet the real me.
And my misfits way of life.
A dark black past is my
Most valued possession.
Hindsight is always 20-20,
But looking back its still a bit fuzzy.
Speak of mutually assured destruction?
Nice story...tell it to readers digest!!! |
| |
03-07-2006, 12:25 AM
|
#216 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 12,052
Country: | No problem. We all make mistakes...
__________________ "When you go home tomorrow, don't expect anyone to know what you have been through. Even if they did know, most people probably wouldn't care anyway. Some of you may get the medals you deserve, many more of you will not. But remember this, all of you are now members of the front-line club, and that is the most exclusive club in the world." - Lt. Col. Matthew Maer CO 1st Battalion, the Princess of Wale's Royal Regiment. Camp Abu Naji, Oct. 2004  To those in that club. |
| |
03-07-2006, 01:36 AM
|
#217 | | Der Crewchief
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 29,327
Country: | Quote: |
Originally Posted by 102first_hussars F-14 ... Which was a good debate - lots of good information came from that.... | [/quote]
Nope the Lightning still has not won that either. While I agree the Lightning was one of the best of all times, and I have allways agreed with that, the F-14 was a more capable interceptor overall than the Lightning was. It had a better weapons package and avionix package and overall performance was great as well.
__________________ US Army Blackhawk Crewchief 2000-2006 Classic ww2aircraft.net quotes: fly boy said: "isn't that the first jet bomber? becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles" "wait what ok who made the b-2 crash come on people that messed up its a b-2" "ah yes the mistel those things are so annoying is games and in real life" |
| |
03-07-2006, 01:39 AM
|
#218 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 12,052
Country: | But the statistics proved that, even with the Phoenix missile, the F-14 would still be beaten to target.
__________________ "When you go home tomorrow, don't expect anyone to know what you have been through. Even if they did know, most people probably wouldn't care anyway. Some of you may get the medals you deserve, many more of you will not. But remember this, all of you are now members of the front-line club, and that is the most exclusive club in the world." - Lt. Col. Matthew Maer CO 1st Battalion, the Princess of Wale's Royal Regiment. Camp Abu Naji, Oct. 2004  To those in that club. |
| |
03-07-2006, 01:44 AM
|
#219 | | Der Crewchief
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 29,327
Country: | Does not mean that the Lightning was more capable than the F-14. How many targets can the Lightning aquire and engage at one time? How far out can a Lightnings radar aquire its target? Overall the F-14 was more advanced, and more capable.
Am I saying the Lightning was not one of the best? No I think it is one of the best of all times the F-14 is more advanced and more capable.
__________________ US Army Blackhawk Crewchief 2000-2006 Classic ww2aircraft.net quotes: fly boy said: "isn't that the first jet bomber? becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles" "wait what ok who made the b-2 crash come on people that messed up its a b-2" "ah yes the mistel those things are so annoying is games and in real life" |
| |
03-07-2006, 01:49 AM
|
#220 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 12,052
Country: | The Lightning can acquire it's target, and destroy it before the F-14 can. That's been proven , simply enough the Lightning was quick enough to be amongst the enemy before the F-14 had destroyed it's target .
And since the Lightning would be amongst it's enemy, the two missiles and two Adens were open to any target in the area. It's all well and good having fancy avionics , but the Lightning was still intercepting the target further out from base than the F-14 was.
__________________ "When you go home tomorrow, don't expect anyone to know what you have been through. Even if they did know, most people probably wouldn't care anyway. Some of you may get the medals you deserve, many more of you will not. But remember this, all of you are now members of the front-line club, and that is the most exclusive club in the world." - Lt. Col. Matthew Maer CO 1st Battalion, the Princess of Wale's Royal Regiment. Camp Abu Naji, Oct. 2004  To those in that club. |
| |
03-07-2006, 01:56 AM
|
#221 | | Der Crewchief
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 29,327
Country: | You are missing my point pD.
__________________ US Army Blackhawk Crewchief 2000-2006 Classic ww2aircraft.net quotes: fly boy said: "isn't that the first jet bomber? becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles" "wait what ok who made the b-2 crash come on people that messed up its a b-2" "ah yes the mistel those things are so annoying is games and in real life" |
| |
03-07-2006, 01:59 AM
|
#222 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 12,052
Country: | No I'm not. You're saying that the F-14 carried a better weapons package, and superior avionics which is true. And once the F-14 was in the air, it could certainly deal with equal or more targets than the Lightning.
But , the Lightning would be destroying enemy planes before the F-14 . Which is what you want when you've got waves of nuclear bombers coming toward your shore , you want them blown out of the sky as quick as possible. And the Lightning does this .
On top of that, looking at a squadron basis ... a F-14 squadron would take longer to scramble than a Lightning squadron . Meaning, there'd be more Lightnings in the sky than F-14s .
__________________ "When you go home tomorrow, don't expect anyone to know what you have been through. Even if they did know, most people probably wouldn't care anyway. Some of you may get the medals you deserve, many more of you will not. But remember this, all of you are now members of the front-line club, and that is the most exclusive club in the world." - Lt. Col. Matthew Maer CO 1st Battalion, the Princess of Wale's Royal Regiment. Camp Abu Naji, Oct. 2004  To those in that club. |
| |
03-07-2006, 09:46 AM
|
#223 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 8,067
| Id agree the F14 has a better avionics and weapons system, but its true the Lightning can intercept the target at a farther distance. I suppose in the scheme of things, whomever can destroy their target first gets the honors.
Plus the F14's had crappy engines (except the -D model)
__________________ "Pilot to copilot..... what are those mountain goats doing up here in the clouds?" |
| |
03-07-2006, 11:42 PM
|
#224 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Edmonton,Alberta
Posts: 2,260
Country: | Quote: |
But , the Lightning would be destroying enemy planes before the F-14
| The F-14 can be loaded with AIM 54 Phoenix missiles, meaning it can engage multiple targets at a range of 140 km away(once hit a drone at 230 km away) as apposed to the Red Tops that can only engage at 12 km, with this said the F-14 would be engaging targets way before the Lightning. Quote: |
On top of that, looking at a squadron basis ... a F-14 squadron would take longer to scramble than a Lightning squadron . Meaning, there'd be more Lightnings in the sky than F-14s
| The F-14 can carry an assorted load of 8 missiles, meaning, there is no need to send dozens of Tomcats in the air, so not a whole lot of time would really be wated on organizing a group, the only time wasted would be loading the weapons and taxiing the plane, the F-14 can achieve 45,000ft a minute (some sources say 50,000ft a minute) but again with a load of 4 AIM-54 missiles that more than makes up for lost time.
__________________ Hello me...meet the real me.
And my misfits way of life.
A dark black past is my
Most valued possession.
Hindsight is always 20-20,
But looking back its still a bit fuzzy.
Speak of mutually assured destruction?
Nice story...tell it to readers digest!!! |
| |
03-08-2006, 01:42 AM
|
#225 | | Master of Ewes
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 19,959
Country: | Quote: |
The F-14 can be loaded with AIM 54 Phoenix missiles, meaning it can engage multiple targets at a range of 140 km away(once hit a drone at 230 km away) as apposed to the Red Tops that can only engage at 12 km, with this said the F-14 would be engaging targets way before the Lightning
| what you think the -14 can fire 'em off as soon as his gear's up? he'll need altitude before he can even think about firing any missiles, and were the tomcats sitting on the end of the runway, fueled and armed in a constant state of alert? no, meaning extra time is needed to get them out to the runway and ready to go, in the meantime the lightning's rocketing through 40,000 and 50,000ft Quote: |
The F-14 can carry an assorted load of 8 missiles, meaning, there is no need to send dozens of Tomcats in the air
| is that because, the ruskies, being so nice, would only send small formations over if they're going to bomb us? they don't want to cause the americans the inconvenience of having to send up more than one plane at a time so they'll only send four  if they launched a large scale raid you'd need entire squadrons of either aircraft, you're gonna get a lightening squadron up before a tomcat sqn, heck i'd bet good money we'd get a vulcan sqn up to counter attack the russians before you'd get a tomcat sqn up 
__________________ 
"Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy." |
| | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:59 PM. | |