 |
04-05-2008, 09:07 PM
|
#586 | | IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 12,511
Country: | Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt308 I am the Easter Bunny, Flyboy. So what's your point? | That was my point! 
__________________ "IF ITS RED OR DUSTY, DON'T TOUCH IT" |
| |
04-06-2008, 04:37 AM
|
#587 | | Der Crewchief
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 28,577
Country: | Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt308 Mine was too subtle...
Hey SMG, your post was indicative or either your age, your IQ, or your shoe size.
Was that better Adler? | Thank you... 
__________________ US Army Blackhawk Crewchief 2000-2006 Classic ww2aircraft.net quotes: fly boy said: "isn't that the first jet bomber? becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles" "wait what ok who made the b-2 crash come on people that messed up its a b-2" "ah yes the mistel those things are so annoying is games and in real life" |
| |
04-06-2008, 11:02 AM
|
#588 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 5,078
Country: | Someone needs to take their nap, before they get all grumpy...
__________________ 
JAN
"I´m going back to the front to relax"
"THE BLACK CATS FLIES TONIGHT"
"Find your enemy and shoot him down - everything else is unimportant"
"When you're out of F-8's... You're out of fighters!" |
| |
04-06-2008, 12:16 PM
|
#589 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 359
Country: | F4F WILDCAT!
...oh, it says best JET fighter...  (sorry).
Oh man, this is tough. I don't even see a couple of planes I'd personally consider among the best, if nothing else.
FJ-4 and F-5/20.
Granted, neither made much impact during wartime (Did the FJ-4 even enter a battle?), but I think they would've made an excellent showing of themselves.
Small targets are hard to hit. Small FAST targets are dam near impossible to hit!
Man, I like the F-4, but I equally like the F's 8-18, too.
The 104 was the "super duper" plane of its day, but so was the 106 (which is also not on the list).
Then the Mirage, the Migs..it boggles the mind.
...so...
I'm just going to close my eyes and pick one.
....and the winner is...
...me....oops, sorry. Wrong award.
I'll take the F-22.
Its the most advanced and the vectored thrust should make it the most manuverable.
Its probably the most versatile, too, althogh I'm sure there's a ton of F-4 jockey's out there that would beg to differ.
So for no other reason than, "that's my choice", The F-22.
Elvis
Last edited by Elvis : 04-06-2008 at 01:12 PM.
|
| |
04-06-2008, 12:19 PM
|
#590 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 359
Country: | Quote:
Originally Posted by 102first_hussars I belive the Avro Arrow simply because Im Canadian,
It has no combat record , but it definately would have changed the world we live in today if it wasnt cancelled. | You know, there's talk out there that the Arrow was the basis for the F-111.
Of course, I think it was developed as a bomber.
I wonder how successful the F-111 would've been as a fighter.
...its kinda big for one, isn't it?
Elvis |
| |
04-14-2008, 03:16 PM
|
#591 | | Member
Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Lethbridge, AB Canada
Posts: 56
Country: | A total miss use of military equipment...ps, can i book this for the next BBQ with the in-laws... YouTube - i won't flinch
cheers bf109 Emil |
| |
04-14-2008, 03:28 PM
|
#592 | | IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 12,511
Country: | Quote:
Originally Posted by Elvis You know, there's talk out there that the Arrow was the basis for the F-111. | Talk? From who? Not even close!!! Quote:
Originally Posted by Elvis Of course, I think it was developed as a bomber.
I wonder how successful the F-111 would've been as a fighter. | The F-111 did have a very capable air-to-air capability and many F-111 squadrons also trained for air-to-air. I work with an O-6 who once told me he locked on several MiGs who been trailing him on a NATO exercise over the Norwegian Sea in the 1980s.
__________________ "IF ITS RED OR DUSTY, DON'T TOUCH IT" |
| |
04-15-2008, 06:20 AM
|
#593 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 359
Country: | Really. I've always heard of the 111 in terms of being a bomber (maybe bomber-type would be more accurate), like in the same class as an F-101 (although newer).
The "F" classification would give creedence to having some kind of air-to-air capability, but whenever I've asked servicemen in the past all I get is a smarmy "hmph!" accompanied by a $h!t eatin' grin and "right".
I forget where I heard that about the Arrow and the F-111. I must've read it or maybe saw it on TV, because I remember a picture showing the general outline of the two planes and how similar they were.
I don't know. If you say no, then fine, its not.
Elvis
Last edited by Elvis : 04-15-2008 at 06:23 AM.
|
| |
04-15-2008, 10:37 AM
|
#594 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: NIAGARA
Posts: 4,058
Country: | Quote:
Originally Posted by Elvis Really. I've always heard of the 111 in terms of being a bomber (maybe bomber-type would be more accurate), like in the same class as an F-101 (although newer).
The "F" classification would give creedence to having some kind of air-to-air capability, but whenever I've asked servicemen in the past all I get is a smarmy "hmph!" accompanied by a $h!t eatin' grin and "right".
I forget where I heard that about the Arrow and the F-111. I must've read it or maybe saw it on TV, because I remember a picture showing the general outline of the two planes and how similar they were.
I don't know. If you say no, then fine, its not.
Elvis | I saw the same thing but it wasn't the 111 it was the 14 I believe the they showed both aircraft from the from the front and the resemblence was uncanny
__________________ |
| |
04-15-2008, 11:55 AM
|
#595 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: oregon
Posts: 1,899
Country: | Quote:
Originally Posted by Elvis Really. I've always heard of the 111 in terms of being a bomber (maybe bomber-type would be more accurate), like in the same class as an F-101 (although newer).
The "F" classification would give creedence to having some kind of air-to-air capability, but whenever I've asked servicemen in the past all I get is a smarmy "hmph!" accompanied by a $h!t eatin' grin and "right".
I forget where I heard that about the Arrow and the F-111. I must've read it or maybe saw it on TV, because I remember a picture showing the general outline of the two planes and how similar they were.
I don't know. If you say no, then fine, its not.
Elvis | The F-111 was Mcnamara's Edsel for the USAF and USN - the first joint service 'must buy'. It was first operational swing wing 'tactical' aircraft designed for TAC in AF and to replace A6 and other tactical strike a/c for Navy. The USN played the game for awhile bbut carrier requirements took the weight way up and Navy bailed out.
In it's way it was a useful weapon, fast, terrain following, all weather fighter bomber - but the use of 'fighter' in same breath is not useful. Although its first deployment to SE asia was not a success, its ability to perform all weather strikes under radar was continuously improved and it was effective in both that role as well as Electronic Counter Measure a/c and replaced the F-105 and EB-66 and B-57 altogether. |
| |
04-15-2008, 12:13 PM
|
#596 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Washington State
Posts: 8,941
Country: | Quote:
Originally Posted by pbfoot I saw the same thing but it wasn't the 111 it was the 14 I believe the they showed both aircraft from the from the front and the resemblence was uncanny |
Another reason to never trust television...
__________________ 
"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if
they made a difference in the world. But, the [U.S.]
Marines don't have that problem."
-- Ronald Reagan Master of Duplicate Posts |
| |
04-15-2008, 12:19 PM
|
#597 | | IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 12,511
Country: | My father in law flew the F-111, said it was one of the fastest aircraft he ever flown once it started building up speed....
__________________ "IF ITS RED OR DUSTY, DON'T TOUCH IT" |
| |
04-15-2008, 12:21 PM
|
#598 | | Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 67
Country: | dident the f 14 replaisd the f 111 as an intersepter
__________________  |
| |
04-15-2008, 12:24 PM
|
#599 | | IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 12,511
Country: | Quote:
Originally Posted by smg dident the f 14 replaisd the f 111 as an intersepter | NO
__________________ "IF ITS RED OR DUSTY, DON'T TOUCH IT" |
| |
04-15-2008, 12:33 PM
|
#600 | | Der Crewchief
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 28,577
Country: | Quote:
Originally Posted by pbfoot I saw the same thing but it wasn't the 111 it was the 14 I believe the they showed both aircraft from the from the front and the resemblence was uncanny | They dont look anything alike from the front, or from any angle as a matter of fact.
__________________ US Army Blackhawk Crewchief 2000-2006 Classic ww2aircraft.net quotes: fly boy said: "isn't that the first jet bomber? becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles" "wait what ok who made the b-2 crash come on people that messed up its a b-2" "ah yes the mistel those things are so annoying is games and in real life" |
| | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode | | |