Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums

The Greatest Fighter Jet of All Time.

Modern Discuss The Greatest Fighter Jet of All Time. in the Other Eras forums; Originally Posted by Matt308 I am the Easter Bunny, Flyboy. So what's your point? That was my point!...


Go Back   Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums > Other Eras > Modern

View Poll Results: Which is the Best?
CF-105 Arrow 4 2.78%
Sabre F-86 16 11.11%
Mig 15 2 1.39%
MiG-21 3 2.08%
Harrier 7 4.86%
EF-2000 3 2.08%
Mirage 2000 2 1.39%
F-14 Tomcat 14 9.72%
F-15 Eagle 29 20.14%
Mig 29 Fulcrum 7 4.86%
SU-37 11 7.64%
F-4 Phantom 13 9.03%
English Electric Lightning 8 5.56%
F-22 Raptor 14 9.72%
F-18 Super Hornet 7 4.86%
F-8 Crusader 1 0.69%
F-104 Starfighter 3 2.08%
Voters: 144. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack (1) Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 04-05-2008, 09:07 PM   #586
IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO
 
FLYBOYJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 12,511
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt308 View Post
I am the Easter Bunny, Flyboy. So what's your point?
That was my point!
__________________
"IF ITS RED OR DUSTY, DON'T TOUCH IT"
FLYBOYJ is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2008, 04:37 AM   #587
Der Crewchief
 
DerAdlerIstGelandet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 28,577
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt308 View Post
Mine was too subtle...

Hey SMG, your post was indicative or either your age, your IQ, or your shoe size.

Was that better Adler?
Thank you...

__________________

US Army Blackhawk Crewchief 2000-2006

Classic ww2aircraft.net quotes:

fly boy said: "isn't that the first jet bomber? becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"

"wait what ok who made the b-2 crash come on people that messed up its a b-2"

"ah yes the mistel those things are so annoying is games and in real life"
DerAdlerIstGelandet is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2008, 11:02 AM   #588
Senior Member
 
Lucky13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 5,078
Country:
Someone needs to take their nap, before they get all grumpy...
__________________

JAN
"I´m going back to the front to relax"
"THE BLACK CATS FLIES TONIGHT"
"Find your enemy and shoot him down - everything else is unimportant"
"When you're out of F-8's... You're out of fighters!"
Lucky13 is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2008, 12:16 PM   #589
Senior Member
 
Elvis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 359
Country:
Smile

F4F WILDCAT!

...oh, it says best JET fighter... (sorry).

Oh man, this is tough. I don't even see a couple of planes I'd personally consider among the best, if nothing else.
FJ-4 and F-5/20.
Granted, neither made much impact during wartime (Did the FJ-4 even enter a battle?), but I think they would've made an excellent showing of themselves.
Small targets are hard to hit. Small FAST targets are dam near impossible to hit!

Man, I like the F-4, but I equally like the F's 8-18, too.
The 104 was the "super duper" plane of its day, but so was the 106 (which is also not on the list).
Then the Mirage, the Migs..it boggles the mind.

...so...

I'm just going to close my eyes and pick one.


....and the winner is...


































































...me....oops, sorry. Wrong award.















I'll take the F-22.

Its the most advanced and the vectored thrust should make it the most manuverable.
Its probably the most versatile, too, althogh I'm sure there's a ton of F-4 jockey's out there that would beg to differ.

So for no other reason than, "that's my choice", The F-22.






Elvis

Last edited by Elvis : 04-06-2008 at 01:12 PM.
Elvis is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2008, 12:19 PM   #590
Senior Member
 
Elvis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 359
Country:
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by 102first_hussars View Post
I belive the Avro Arrow simply because Im Canadian,
It has no combat record , but it definately would have changed the world we live in today if it wasnt cancelled.
You know, there's talk out there that the Arrow was the basis for the F-111.
Of course, I think it was developed as a bomber.
I wonder how successful the F-111 would've been as a fighter.

...its kinda big for one, isn't it?




Elvis
Elvis is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2008, 03:16 PM   #591
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Lethbridge, AB Canada
Posts: 56
Country:
A total miss use of military equipment...ps, can i book this for the next BBQ with the in-laws...

YouTube - i won't flinch

cheers bf109 Emil
bf109 Emil is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2008, 03:28 PM   #592
IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO
 
FLYBOYJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 12,511
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elvis View Post
You know, there's talk out there that the Arrow was the basis for the F-111.
Talk? From who? Not even close!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elvis View Post
Of course, I think it was developed as a bomber.
I wonder how successful the F-111 would've been as a fighter.
The F-111 did have a very capable air-to-air capability and many F-111 squadrons also trained for air-to-air. I work with an O-6 who once told me he locked on several MiGs who been trailing him on a NATO exercise over the Norwegian Sea in the 1980s.
__________________
"IF ITS RED OR DUSTY, DON'T TOUCH IT"
FLYBOYJ is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2008, 06:20 AM   #593
Senior Member
 
Elvis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 359
Country:
Smile

Really. I've always heard of the 111 in terms of being a bomber (maybe bomber-type would be more accurate), like in the same class as an F-101 (although newer).
The "F" classification would give creedence to having some kind of air-to-air capability, but whenever I've asked servicemen in the past all I get is a smarmy "hmph!" accompanied by a $h!t eatin' grin and "right".

I forget where I heard that about the Arrow and the F-111. I must've read it or maybe saw it on TV, because I remember a picture showing the general outline of the two planes and how similar they were.


I don't know. If you say no, then fine, its not.



Elvis

Last edited by Elvis : 04-15-2008 at 06:23 AM.
Elvis is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2008, 10:37 AM   #594
Senior Member
 
pbfoot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NIAGARA
Posts: 4,058
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elvis View Post
Really. I've always heard of the 111 in terms of being a bomber (maybe bomber-type would be more accurate), like in the same class as an F-101 (although newer).
The "F" classification would give creedence to having some kind of air-to-air capability, but whenever I've asked servicemen in the past all I get is a smarmy "hmph!" accompanied by a $h!t eatin' grin and "right".

I forget where I heard that about the Arrow and the F-111. I must've read it or maybe saw it on TV, because I remember a picture showing the general outline of the two planes and how similar they were.


I don't know. If you say no, then fine, its not.



Elvis
I saw the same thing but it wasn't the 111 it was the 14 I believe the they showed both aircraft from the from the front and the resemblence was uncanny
__________________
pbfoot is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2008, 11:55 AM   #595
Senior Member
 
drgondog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: oregon
Posts: 1,899
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elvis View Post
Really. I've always heard of the 111 in terms of being a bomber (maybe bomber-type would be more accurate), like in the same class as an F-101 (although newer).
The "F" classification would give creedence to having some kind of air-to-air capability, but whenever I've asked servicemen in the past all I get is a smarmy "hmph!" accompanied by a $h!t eatin' grin and "right".

I forget where I heard that about the Arrow and the F-111. I must've read it or maybe saw it on TV, because I remember a picture showing the general outline of the two planes and how similar they were.


I don't know. If you say no, then fine, its not.



Elvis
The F-111 was Mcnamara's Edsel for the USAF and USN - the first joint service 'must buy'. It was first operational swing wing 'tactical' aircraft designed for TAC in AF and to replace A6 and other tactical strike a/c for Navy. The USN played the game for awhile bbut carrier requirements took the weight way up and Navy bailed out.

In it's way it was a useful weapon, fast, terrain following, all weather fighter bomber - but the use of 'fighter' in same breath is not useful. Although its first deployment to SE asia was not a success, its ability to perform all weather strikes under radar was continuously improved and it was effective in both that role as well as Electronic Counter Measure a/c and replaced the F-105 and EB-66 and B-57 altogether.
drgondog is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2008, 12:13 PM   #596
Senior Member
 
Matt308's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Washington State
Posts: 8,941
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by pbfoot View Post
I saw the same thing but it wasn't the 111 it was the 14 I believe the they showed both aircraft from the from the front and the resemblence was uncanny

Another reason to never trust television...
Attached Images
File Type: jpg arrow6.jpg (63.5 KB, 25 views)
File Type: jpg f-14-plane9-s.jpg (6.4 KB, 24 views)
__________________

"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if
they made a difference in the world. But, the [U.S.]
Marines don't have that problem."
-- Ronald Reagan

Master of Duplicate Posts
Matt308 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2008, 12:19 PM   #597
IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO
 
FLYBOYJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 12,511
Country:
My father in law flew the F-111, said it was one of the fastest aircraft he ever flown once it started building up speed....
__________________
"IF ITS RED OR DUSTY, DON'T TOUCH IT"
FLYBOYJ is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2008, 12:21 PM   #598
smg
Member
 
smg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 67
Country:
Send a message via MSN to smg
dident the f 14 replaisd the f 111 as an intersepter
__________________
smg is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2008, 12:24 PM   #599
IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO
 
FLYBOYJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 12,511
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by smg View Post
dident the f 14 replaisd the f 111 as an intersepter
NO
__________________
"IF ITS RED OR DUSTY, DON'T TOUCH IT"
FLYBOYJ is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2008, 12:33 PM   #600
Der Crewchief
 
DerAdlerIstGelandet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 28,577
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by pbfoot View Post
I saw the same thing but it wasn't the 111 it was the 14 I believe the they showed both aircraft from the from the front and the resemblence was uncanny
They dont look anything alike from the front, or from any angle as a matter of fact.
__________________

US Army Blackhawk Crewchief 2000-2006

Classic ww2aircraft.net quotes:

fly boy said: "isn't that the first jet bomber? becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"

"wait what ok who made the b-2 crash come on people that messed up its a b-2"

"ah yes the mistel those things are so annoying is games and in real life"
DerAdlerIstGelandet is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote