Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums
 



Go Back   Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums > Other Eras > Modern

Modern A place to discuss Vietnam through present.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-20-2007, 10:28 PM   #16
Senior Member
 
machine shop tom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 265
Quote:
Originally Posted by mkloby View Post
You mean Iran makes their own TOW targets!

It's interesting to note - we train with Saudi Arabian helo bubbas, although I have not seen any Saudi flight students lately.
I wonder if the main gun autoloader is the same as the Soviet one that occasionally thinks the gunner's arm is a round.

tom
__________________
The First Amendment is indefensible without the Second Amendment.
machine shop tom is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2007, 10:41 PM   #17
Senior Member
 
mkloby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Jacksonville, NC
Posts: 3,562
Quote:
Originally Posted by comiso90 View Post
>>It's interesting to note - we train with Saudi Arabian helo bubbas, although I have not seen any Saudi flight students lately.<<

Any info on troop movements is generally not discussed in open forums...
But what do I know I havent worn a uniform in 15 years!

.
This is not troop movement. Many foreign nationals train with the USN. They live out in town and mingle with the folks. It's a well known and publicized training program. In no way was that any breach of security, let me assure you.
__________________
If the Army and the Navy ever look on heaven's scenes, they will find the streets are guarded by United States Marines


mkloby is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2007, 10:47 PM   #18
Senior Member
 
comiso90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: FL
Posts: 3,294
Quote:
Originally Posted by mkloby View Post
This is not troop movement. Many foreign nationals train with the USN. They live out in town and mingle with the folks. It's a well known and publicized training program. In no way was that any breach of security, let me assure you.
It was the part about them "not being around lately".. that is a troop movement.
It's a small piece that could motivate an interested party to research where they have shifted... perhaps there is a buildup we don't know about... unless you start looking for people that have moved on..

Any information is TOO MUCH information

Just a thought... I'm trying to watch out for ya!

.
__________________


http://www.BOOKSonWAR.com/
.
comiso90 is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2007, 11:10 PM   #19
aka Dickcheese
 
Matt308's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Washington State
Posts: 13,386
Is it just me or does the Iranian tank look like an Isreali Merkava?!?!? Now that is friggin hilarious. These jokers have to duplicate a tank of their most hated enemy of all the tank designs in the world. That must cost Iranian engineers a few virgins upon judgement day.
__________________

"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if
they made a difference in the world. But, the [U.S.]
Marines don't have that problem."
-- Ronald Reagan

Master of Duplicate Posts
Matt308 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2007, 11:23 PM   #20
Senior Member
 
mkloby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Jacksonville, NC
Posts: 3,562
Quote:
Originally Posted by comiso90 View Post
It was the part about them "not being around lately".. that is a troop movement.
It's a small piece that could motivate an interested party to research where they have shifted... perhaps there is a buildup we don't know about... unless you start looking for people that have moved on..

Any information is TOO MUCH information

Just a thought... I'm trying to watch out for ya!

.
I see what you're getting at now, interrpetting it in that way. I understand your thought and intentions. Good imagination! I was not speaking of physical movement - just of not getting a chance to see and talk to any studs lately - as in days because of different schedules - regarding previous comments.
__________________
If the Army and the Navy ever look on heaven's scenes, they will find the streets are guarded by United States Marines


mkloby is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2007, 11:27 PM   #21
Senior Member
 
mkloby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Jacksonville, NC
Posts: 3,562
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt308 View Post
Is it just me or does the Iranian tank look like an Isreali Merkava?!?!? Now that is friggin hilarious. These jokers have to duplicate a tank of their most hated enemy of all the tank designs in the world. That must cost Iranian engineers a few virgins upon judgement day.
You think? The face is very vertical compared to the merkava. However, I believe such an infraction would probably cause them to suffer a 10% reduction in virgin count.
__________________
If the Army and the Navy ever look on heaven's scenes, they will find the streets are guarded by United States Marines


mkloby is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2007, 12:12 AM   #22
aka Dickcheese
 
Matt308's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Washington State
Posts: 13,386
10%? C'mon fudging your enemies engineering is worth a greater reduction than that. We're talking 12yo virgins here. Sheesh.
__________________

"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if
they made a difference in the world. But, the [U.S.]
Marines don't have that problem."
-- Ronald Reagan

Master of Duplicate Posts
Matt308 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2007, 02:59 AM   #23
Senior Member
 
Aggie08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,013
Send a message via AIM to Aggie08
I've always wondered if there's an Israeli or American unit/tank/aircraft nicknamed "Muslim Dating Service." I figure it has to be out there somewhere.

__________________
"I had ten rockets on board, and as I wasn't particularly fond of head-on attacks, I salvoed the whole lot at him. The rockets didn't hit him but but they must have scared the bejesus out of him, for he did a steep turn to starboard... I let him have the full blast, all eight fifty-calibers. I had never seen an aircraft completely disintegrate in the air the way this Me-110 did..."
Bill Dunn, 406th Fighter Group



Matt
Aggie08 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2007, 12:24 AM   #24
aka Dickcheese
 
Matt308's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Washington State
Posts: 13,386
Yeah "C'mon f#ck with me"...
__________________

"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if
they made a difference in the world. But, the [U.S.]
Marines don't have that problem."
-- Ronald Reagan

Master of Duplicate Posts
Matt308 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2007, 08:31 AM   #25
Der Crewchief
 
DerAdlerIstGelandet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 33,152
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt308 View Post
Is it just me or does the Iranian tank look like an Isreali Merkava?!?!? Now that is friggin hilarious. These jokers have to duplicate a tank of their most hated enemy of all the tank designs in the world. That must cost Iranian engineers a few virgins upon judgement day.
Yeah it looks like a cross between a Merkava and a M-1 Abrams. Probably a knock off just like there F-5 knock off this thread is about.

I would not be too worried about this tank or the there stupid as low budget, cant find any spare parts jet.
__________________


fly boy:"isnt that the first jet bomber becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"[/I]
DerAdlerIstGelandet is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2007, 09:07 AM   #26
Senior Member
 
The Basket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 584
Do ya think in any possible war with Iran...that the USAF will get the Raptors in? Or just use what they got?

Underestimating your enemy is the quickest way to lose.
The Basket is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2007, 09:43 AM   #27
Der Crewchief
 
DerAdlerIstGelandet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 33,152
I dont think the US would need the Raptors. Sorry but the Iranians do not have a very up to date airforce or military.

I am not underestimating them but it is the truth. They have a large military but not very well supplied. They are short on spare parts.

The aircraft up there has been analyzed over and over and it is nothing more than a F-5 which they have plenty of but lack spare parts. They basically redesigned the F-5 and modified existing ones. Nothing more. Performance wise it is no different than an F-5. Take a look at it...

Lets take a look at the Iraninan Airforce (based off of Janes and Global Security analasys):

Fighters

Azarakhsh (Lightning): Aprox 36 (30 are being bult over th next 3 years, thats 10 a year. Not a whole lot)

Evidently a modified F-5, this Iranian design evolved from an examination of the wide variety of fighter aircraft in Iran's inventory [which include both the F-4 and F-5], along with training and experimentation.

A scaled-up version of the US Northrop Grumman F-5f Tiger, Azarakhsh features shoulder mounted air intakes. It is said to be a 10- to 15- percent larger than the F-5. It incorporates an Iranian-designed radar, but with some of the avionics modules actually of Russian design.


Shafaq (Before the Dawn): None in Service but one was ready for test flight as of 2004.

Chengdu J-7: Aprox 25 in service.

F-14 Tomcat 77 of which Aprox 3 to 10 are flyable due to lack of spare parts.

Dassault Mirage F1: 24 of which only a few are in service due to lack of parts.

F-4 Phantom: 47

Mig-29: 60 of which only about 10 are believed to be flyable due to lack of spare parts and the fact that several were sold to China for missile and nuclear technology in 1993.

Norhtrop F-5: 166 of which only 45 are flyable due to lack of spare parts.

Shenyang J-6: 6

Attack

Su-24: 32 of which 24 were origianaly Iraqi Airforce and not operable due to lack of spare parts. They have recieved 8 new ones in 2003 that are flyable and in service.

Mig-27: 24

Su-25: 7 former Iraqi Airforce Aircraft. Number flyable is unknown.

Trainer

Beechcraft Bonanza: 20 of which unknown are in service.

FT-7: 5

Embraer EMB 312 Tucano: 20

Lockheed T-33 Shooting Star: 5 of which none are believed to be flyable.

Pilatus PC-7: 20

Saab Safari: 23 built by Pakistan

Transports include numerous C-130s of which many are not believed to be flyable, Boeing 707s, An-24, An-74, Boing 747 and there are also several hundred helicopters.

Sorry but I think the western Airforces can handle themselves just fine against the Iranians without the F-22 using Typhoons, F-15s, F-16s and Grippens combined with AWACS technology (which the Iranians do not have).
__________________


fly boy:"isnt that the first jet bomber becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"[/I]
DerAdlerIstGelandet is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2007, 10:03 AM   #28
Senior Member
 
mkloby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Jacksonville, NC
Posts: 3,562
Absolutely Adler. In a conventional engagement - Iran doesn't stand a chance. With AWACS and E-2s prowling the sky, they won't be able to mount much of an air campaign.

Ground forces - they will be completely vulnerable to AH-1/AH-64... not to mention the soldiers and Marines on the ground - Iranian ground forces do not have nearly the level of training or are they as well equipped as US forces.

Basket - don't you remember what happened to Iraq in the conventional engagements???
__________________
If the Army and the Navy ever look on heaven's scenes, they will find the streets are guarded by United States Marines


mkloby is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2007, 10:15 AM   #29
Senior Member
 
ToughOmbre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Jersey Shore
Posts: 3,233
Quote:
Originally Posted by mkloby View Post
Ground forces - they will be completely vulnerable to AH-1/AH-64... not to mention the soldiers and Marines on the ground
mkloby, don't think we'll be putting men on the ground anytime soon in another ME country. I could be wrong, but right now we just don't have the manpower. And Iran is three times the size of Iraq. But you're right about the air campaign; it would decimate the Iranians.

TO
__________________


“Let's get Enterprise and Hornet turned into the wind."
ToughOmbre is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2007, 12:41 PM   #30
Senior Member
 
Aggie08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,013
Send a message via AIM to Aggie08
I thought for a second there that analysis placed the Beechcraft Bonanza under the "attack" category because I missed the "trainer" title. That might actually be an upgrade for them.

The argument clearly will not be who gets to shoot them down first, it's who gets to destroy them on the runway first.

And as much as we mock their first "domestic" aircraft, it is still quite an achievement that very few countries have ever surpassed. Who knows, maybe in 30 years with some friendly Russians or Chinese they may be making world-class fighters.
__________________
"I had ten rockets on board, and as I wasn't particularly fond of head-on attacks, I salvoed the whole lot at him. The rockets didn't hit him but but they must have scared the bejesus out of him, for he did a steep turn to starboard... I let him have the full blast, all eight fifty-calibers. I had never seen an aircraft completely disintegrate in the air the way this Me-110 did..."
Bill Dunn, 406th Fighter Group



Matt
Aggie08 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:19 PM.
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Ad Management plugin by RedTyger
Design by HTWoRKS


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118