![]() |
| |||||||
| Modern A place to discuss Vietnam through present. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #16 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 265
| Quote:
tom
__________________ The First Amendment is indefensible without the Second Amendment. | |
| | |
| | #17 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Jacksonville, NC
Posts: 3,562
| This is not troop movement. Many foreign nationals train with the USN. They live out in town and mingle with the folks. It's a well known and publicized training program. In no way was that any breach of security, let me assure you.
__________________ If the Army and the Navy ever look on heaven's scenes, they will find the streets are guarded by United States Marines |
| | |
| | #18 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: FL
Posts: 3,294
| Quote:
It's a small piece that could motivate an interested party to research where they have shifted... perhaps there is a buildup we don't know about... unless you start looking for people that have moved on.. Any information is TOO MUCH information Just a thought... I'm trying to watch out for ya! . | |
| | |
| | #19 |
| aka Dickcheese ![]() Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Washington State
Posts: 13,386
| Is it just me or does the Iranian tank look like an Isreali Merkava?!?!?
__________________ "Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if they made a difference in the world. But, the [U.S.] Marines don't have that problem." -- Ronald Reagan Master of Duplicate Posts |
| | |
| | #20 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Jacksonville, NC
Posts: 3,562
| Quote:
__________________ If the Army and the Navy ever look on heaven's scenes, they will find the streets are guarded by United States Marines | |
| | |
| | #21 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Jacksonville, NC
Posts: 3,562
| Quote:
__________________ If the Army and the Navy ever look on heaven's scenes, they will find the streets are guarded by United States Marines | |
| | |
| | #22 |
| aka Dickcheese ![]() Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Washington State
Posts: 13,386
| 10%? C'mon fudging your enemies engineering is worth a greater reduction than that. We're talking 12yo virgins here. Sheesh.
__________________ "Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if they made a difference in the world. But, the [U.S.] Marines don't have that problem." -- Ronald Reagan Master of Duplicate Posts |
| | |
| | #23 |
| Senior Member | I've always wondered if there's an Israeli or American unit/tank/aircraft nicknamed "Muslim Dating Service." I figure it has to be out there somewhere.
__________________ "I had ten rockets on board, and as I wasn't particularly fond of head-on attacks, I salvoed the whole lot at him. The rockets didn't hit him but but they must have scared the bejesus out of him, for he did a steep turn to starboard... I let him have the full blast, all eight fifty-calibers. I had never seen an aircraft completely disintegrate in the air the way this Me-110 did..." Bill Dunn, 406th Fighter Group ![]() Matt |
| | |
| | #24 |
| aka Dickcheese ![]() Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Washington State
Posts: 13,386
| Yeah "C'mon f#ck with me"...
__________________ "Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if they made a difference in the world. But, the [U.S.] Marines don't have that problem." -- Ronald Reagan Master of Duplicate Posts |
| | |
| | #25 | |
| Der Crewchief ![]() Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 33,152
| Quote:
I would not be too worried about this tank or the there stupid as low budget, cant find any spare parts jet.
__________________ ![]() fly boy:"isnt that the first jet bomber becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"[/I] | |
| | |
| | #26 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 584
| Do ya think in any possible war with Iran...that the USAF will get the Raptors in? Or just use what they got? Underestimating your enemy is the quickest way to lose. |
| | |
| | #27 |
| Der Crewchief ![]() Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 33,152
| I dont think the US would need the Raptors. Sorry but the Iranians do not have a very up to date airforce or military. I am not underestimating them but it is the truth. They have a large military but not very well supplied. They are short on spare parts. The aircraft up there has been analyzed over and over and it is nothing more than a F-5 which they have plenty of but lack spare parts. They basically redesigned the F-5 and modified existing ones. Nothing more. Performance wise it is no different than an F-5. Take a look at it... Lets take a look at the Iraninan Airforce (based off of Janes and Global Security analasys): Fighters Azarakhsh (Lightning): Aprox 36 (30 are being bult over th next 3 years, thats 10 a year. Not a whole lot) Evidently a modified F-5, this Iranian design evolved from an examination of the wide variety of fighter aircraft in Iran's inventory [which include both the F-4 and F-5], along with training and experimentation. A scaled-up version of the US Northrop Grumman F-5f Tiger, Azarakhsh features shoulder mounted air intakes. It is said to be a 10- to 15- percent larger than the F-5. It incorporates an Iranian-designed radar, but with some of the avionics modules actually of Russian design. Shafaq (Before the Dawn): None in Service but one was ready for test flight as of 2004. Chengdu J-7: Aprox 25 in service. F-14 Tomcat 77 of which Aprox 3 to 10 are flyable due to lack of spare parts. Dassault Mirage F1: 24 of which only a few are in service due to lack of parts. F-4 Phantom: 47 Mig-29: 60 of which only about 10 are believed to be flyable due to lack of spare parts and the fact that several were sold to China for missile and nuclear technology in 1993. Norhtrop F-5: 166 of which only 45 are flyable due to lack of spare parts. Shenyang J-6: 6 Attack Su-24: 32 of which 24 were origianaly Iraqi Airforce and not operable due to lack of spare parts. They have recieved 8 new ones in 2003 that are flyable and in service. Mig-27: 24 Su-25: 7 former Iraqi Airforce Aircraft. Number flyable is unknown. Trainer Beechcraft Bonanza: 20 of which unknown are in service. FT-7: 5 Embraer EMB 312 Tucano: 20 Lockheed T-33 Shooting Star: 5 of which none are believed to be flyable. Pilatus PC-7: 20 Saab Safari: 23 built by Pakistan Transports include numerous C-130s of which many are not believed to be flyable, Boeing 707s, An-24, An-74, Boing 747 and there are also several hundred helicopters. Sorry but I think the western Airforces can handle themselves just fine against the Iranians without the F-22 using Typhoons, F-15s, F-16s and Grippens combined with AWACS technology (which the Iranians do not have).
__________________ ![]() fly boy:"isnt that the first jet bomber becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"[/I] |
| | |
| | #28 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Jacksonville, NC
Posts: 3,562
| Absolutely Adler. In a conventional engagement - Iran doesn't stand a chance. With AWACS and E-2s prowling the sky, they won't be able to mount much of an air campaign. Ground forces - they will be completely vulnerable to AH-1/AH-64... not to mention the soldiers and Marines on the ground - Iranian ground forces do not have nearly the level of training or are they as well equipped as US forces. Basket - don't you remember what happened to Iraq in the conventional engagements???
__________________ If the Army and the Navy ever look on heaven's scenes, they will find the streets are guarded by United States Marines |
| | |
| | #29 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Jersey Shore
Posts: 3,233
| Quote:
TO
__________________ ![]() “Let's get Enterprise and Hornet turned into the wind." | |
| | |
| | #30 |
| Senior Member | I thought for a second there that analysis placed the Beechcraft Bonanza under the "attack" category because I missed the "trainer" title. That might actually be an upgrade for them. The argument clearly will not be who gets to shoot them down first, it's who gets to destroy them on the runway first. And as much as we mock their first "domestic" aircraft, it is still quite an achievement that very few countries have ever surpassed. Who knows, maybe in 30 years with some friendly Russians or Chinese they may be making world-class fighters.
__________________ "I had ten rockets on board, and as I wasn't particularly fond of head-on attacks, I salvoed the whole lot at him. The rockets didn't hit him but but they must have scared the bejesus out of him, for he did a steep turn to starboard... I let him have the full blast, all eight fifty-calibers. I had never seen an aircraft completely disintegrate in the air the way this Me-110 did..." Bill Dunn, 406th Fighter Group ![]() Matt |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |